This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 1, 2026. It is now read-only.
feat: read_modify_write and check_and_mutate_row#780
Merged
daniel-sanche merged 62 commits intoJun 16, 2023
googleapis:v3googleapis/python-bigtable:v3from
daniel-sanche:mutate_rows_other_rpcsdaniel-sanche/python-bigtable:mutate_rows_other_rpcsCopy head branch name to clipboard
Merged
feat: read_modify_write and check_and_mutate_row#780daniel-sanche merged 62 commits intogoogleapis:v3googleapis/python-bigtable:v3from daniel-sanche:mutate_rows_other_rpcsdaniel-sanche/python-bigtable:mutate_rows_other_rpcsCopy head branch name to clipboard
daniel-sanche merged 62 commits into
googleapis:v3googleapis/python-bigtable:v3from
daniel-sanche:mutate_rows_other_rpcsdaniel-sanche/python-bigtable:mutate_rows_other_rpcsCopy head branch name to clipboard
Conversation
mutianf
reviewed
Jun 14, 2023
| true_case_mutations: Mutation | list[Mutation] | None = None, | ||
| false_case_mutations: Mutation | list[Mutation] | None = None, | ||
| operation_timeout: int | float | None = 60, | ||
| operation_timeout: int | float | None = 600, |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
10 minutes seems too long.. the java default is only 20 seconds. https://cloud.google.com/java/docs/reference/google-cloud-bigtable/latest/com.google.cloud.bigtable.data.v2.stub.EnhancedBigtableStubSettings#com_google_cloud_bigtable_data_v2_stub_EnhancedBigtableStubSettings_checkAndMutateRowSettings__
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changed, but FYI I will likely be changing the timeout structure after all the rpc PRs are merged: #782
| rules: ReadModifyWriteRule | list[ReadModifyWriteRule], | ||
| *, | ||
| operation_timeout: int | float | None = 60, | ||
| operation_timeout: int | float | None = 600, |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same here, I think we can update it to be 20 seconds to be consistent with java
| (10, 4, 14), | ||
| (MAX_INCREMENT_VALUE, -MAX_INCREMENT_VALUE, 0), | ||
| (MAX_INCREMENT_VALUE, 2, -MAX_INCREMENT_VALUE), | ||
| (-MAX_INCREMENT_VALUE, -2, MAX_INCREMENT_VALUE), |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this the expected behavior? 🤔 @igorbernstein2
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For what it's worth, I believe this is just documenting the overflow behavior from the backend. The client is just sending a large number and then another small increment, and retrieving the result
Contributor
|
Is it possible to extend the read_modify_write and check_and_mutate row to enable retry on certain error codes in the future? |
daniel-sanche
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
* feat: add new v3.0.0 API skeleton (#745) * feat: improve rows filters (#751) * feat: read rows query model class (#752) * feat: implement row and cell model classes (#753) * feat: add pooled grpc transport (#748) * feat: implement read_rows (#762) * feat: implement mutate rows (#769) * feat: literal value filter (#767) * feat: row_exists and read_row (#778) * feat: read_modify_write and check_and_mutate_row (#780) * feat: sharded read rows (#766) * feat: ping and warm with metadata (#810) * feat: mutate rows batching (#770) * chore: restructure module paths (#816) * feat: improve timeout structure (#819) * fix: api errors apply to all bulk mutations * chore: reduce public api surface (#820) * feat: improve error group tracebacks on < py11 (#825) * feat: optimize read_rows (#852) * chore: add user agent suffix (#842) * feat: optimize retries (#854) * feat: add test proxy (#836) * chore(tests): add conformance tests to CI for v3 (#870) * chore(tests): turn off fast fail for conformance tets (#882) * feat: add TABLE_DEFAULTS enum for table method arguments (#880) * fix: pass None for retry in gapic calls (#881) * feat: replace internal dictionaries with protos in gapic calls (#875) * chore: optimize gapic calls (#863) * feat: expose retryable error codes to users (#879) * chore: update api_core submodule (#897) * chore: merge main into experimental_v3 (#900) * chore: pin conformance tests to v0.0.2 (#903) * fix: bulk mutation eventual success (#909) --------- Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements
read_modify_writeandcheck_and_mutate_rowrpcs, along with related classes