mgmt: add back serviceip in ManagementServerResponse#10891
mgmt: add back serviceip in ManagementServerResponse#10891Pearl1594 merged 3 commits intoapache:4.20apache/cloudstack:4.20from weizhouapache:4.20-add-back-serviceipweizhouapache/cloudstack:4.20-add-back-serviceipCopy head branch name to clipboard
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #10891 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 16.13% 16.14%
- Complexity 13239 13241 +2
=========================================
Files 5656 5656
Lines 497579 497586 +7
Branches 60333 60333
=========================================
+ Hits 80297 80312 +15
+ Misses 408333 408324 -9
- Partials 8949 8950 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
yadvr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM - since this fixes API regression, we should consider this as critical for 4.20.1
|
@weizhouapache can you also look at failing github action smoketests? |
|
@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13454 |
thanks @rohityadavcloud the remaining test failures are addressed by #10875 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
@weizhouapache , can we somehow mark it as deprecated? (ltgm, btw) |
@DaanHoogland |
I think it would be good to add it to the description that using ipaddress instead is advised. |
that's already added. @DaanHoogland I added |
sorry, reviewed from the wild (not at desk)
great, I don’t think we can do better. |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-13359)
|
* mgmt: add back serviceip in ManagementServerResponse * api: add Deprecated annotation to serviceip
Description
The PR #9773 changed the
serviceiptoipaddressin the API response, which broke backward compatibility.Although a test failure has been fixed in #10501 , I think it would be better to add it back.
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?