You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Per CSS Multicol 1, if column-rule-style is none or hidden, then the computed value of column-rule-width will be 0.
Gaps 1 extends the definitions of the column-rule-* properties to allow for lists of values. It also seeks to preserve the existing behavior noted above for backwards compatibility. But in what cases should the backward compatibility behavior apply? I can see a couple of reasonable possibilities:
If column-rule-style contains exactly one value and that value is none or hidden, then the computed value of column-rule-width is 0.
If column-rule-style contains nothing other than none, hidden, or repeaters containing nothing other than none or hidden, then the computed value of column-rule-width is 0.
My inclination is towards 1. Does the WG agree? Any options I might have missed?
Per CSS Multicol 1, if
column-rule-styleisnoneorhidden, then the computed value ofcolumn-rule-widthwill be 0.Gaps 1 extends the definitions of the column-rule-* properties to allow for lists of values. It also seeks to preserve the existing behavior noted above for backwards compatibility. But in what cases should the backward compatibility behavior apply? I can see a couple of reasonable possibilities:
column-rule-stylecontains exactly one value and that value isnoneorhidden, then the computed value ofcolumn-rule-widthis0.column-rule-stylecontains nothing other thannone,hidden, or repeaters containing nothing other thannoneorhidden, then the computed value ofcolumn-rule-widthis0.My inclination is towards 1. Does the WG agree? Any options I might have missed?