Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Remove ".NET" from Aspire references - #5968

#5968
Merged
thomhurst merged 3 commits into
thomhurst:mainthomhurst/TUnit:mainfrom
antmdvs:mainantmdvs/TUnit:mainCopy head branch name to clipboard
May 20, 2026
Merged

Remove ".NET" from Aspire references#5968
thomhurst merged 3 commits into
thomhurst:mainthomhurst/TUnit:mainfrom
antmdvs:mainantmdvs/TUnit:mainCopy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@antmdvs

@antmdvs antmdvs commented May 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Aspire dropped the ".NET" moniker some time ago. This PR updates the templates and docs accordingly. In some cases, this may improve discoverability, such as when filtering by template "tag" in the CLI 👇 or Project Type in Visual Studio.

dotnet new list --tag aspire

Current behavior:

No templates found matching: --tag='aspire'.

Desired behavior:

Template Name                 Short Name            Language  Tags
----------------------------  --------------------  --------  ----------------------------------------------------------
TUnit Aspire Starter Project  TUnit.Aspire.Starter  [C#]      Test/TUnit/Asp/ASP.NET/Blazor/Aspire/Cloud/Playwright
TUnit Aspire Test Project     TUnit.Aspire.Test     [C#]      Common/Test/TUnit/Aspire/Cloud

Related Issue

I didn't create an issue for this.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update
  • Performance improvement
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)

Checklist

Required

  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines
  • If this is a new feature, I started a discussion first and received agreement
  • My code follows the project's code style (modern C# syntax, proper naming conventions)
  • I have written tests that prove my fix is effective or my feature works

TUnit-Specific Requirements

  • Dual-Mode Implementation: If this change affects test discovery/execution, I have implemented it in BOTH:
    • Source Generator path (TUnit.Core.SourceGenerator)
    • Reflection path (TUnit.Engine)
  • Snapshot Tests: If I changed source generator output or public APIs:
    • I ran TUnit.Core.SourceGenerator.Tests and/or TUnit.PublicAPI tests
    • I reviewed the .received.txt files and accepted them as .verified.txt
    • I committed the updated .verified.txt files
  • Performance: If this change affects hot paths (test discovery, execution, assertions):
    • I minimized allocations and avoided LINQ in hot paths
    • I cached reflection results where appropriate
  • AOT Compatibility: If this change uses reflection:
    • I added appropriate [DynamicallyAccessedMembers] annotations
    • I verified the change works with dotnet publish -p:PublishAot=true

Testing

  • All existing tests pass (dotnet test)
  • I have added tests that cover my changes
  • I have tested both source-generated and reflection modes (if applicable)

Additional Notes

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@antmdvs
antmdvs temporarily deployed to Pull Requests May 19, 2026 22:45 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@antmdvs
antmdvs temporarily deployed to Pull Requests May 19, 2026 22:45 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@antmdvs
antmdvs temporarily deployed to Pull Requests May 19, 2026 22:45 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@thomhurst

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thanks!

@thomhurst
thomhurst merged commit 4952712 into thomhurst:main May 20, 2026
11 of 12 checks passed
@claude claude Bot mentioned this pull request May 20, 2026
1 task
This was referenced May 20, 2026
This was referenced Jul 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.