Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

teamchong/pxpipe

Open more actions menu

Repository files navigation

pxpipe

Cut Claude Code's input tokens by rendering bulky context as images — the same system prompt, tool docs, and history, in a fraction of the tokens.

An image's token cost is fixed by its pixel dimensions, not by how much text is inside it. Dense content (code, JSON, tool output) packs ~3.1 chars per image-token vs ~1 char per text-token on real Claude Code traffic. The reader is the same vision channel that Anthropic's computer use already relies on for screenshots. pxpipe is a local proxy that uses that channel for context: it rewrites the bulky parts of each request into compact PNGs before it leaves your machine. At current Fable list prices that lands as a ~59–70% lower end-to-end bill — but prices move and workloads differ, so the durable number is the token cut itself, measured per-request against a free count_tokens counterfactual in ~/.pxpipe/events.jsonl.

This is what the model sees instead of text:

example: a real transformRequest output: system prompt + tool docs reflowed into one dense page, instruction banner on top, ↵ marking original newlines

~48k chars of system prompt + tool docs: ≈25k tokens as text, ≈2.7k image tokens as this page. Real pipeline output; the model reads renders like this at 100/100 (see benchmarks).

chart: characters a frontier context window holds, 2018–2026 — vendor text series including Grok 4.5; orange measured overlays are Fable 5 [1m] + pxpipe ~19.0M (4.8×) and Gemini 3.6 Flash + pxpipe ~21.3M (5.3×)

Eight years of context growth, in characters. Every text line tops out near ~4M chars (a 1M-token window at ~4 chars/token); Grok 4.5 is shown as a text-window point only (500K). The orange overlays are the same 1M windows read through pxpipe images — ~19.0M chars for Fable 5 (4.8×) and ~21.3M chars for Gemini 3.6 Flash (5.3× text capacity). Density is measured from a live render at generation time, not hand-typed: regenerate with npx tsx scripts/gen-context-chart.ts (source).

Demo

Fable 5 (the default, 100/100 reader) — plain left, pxpipe right:

Fable-AB-Demo.mp4

pxpipe counts an exact token 10/10 across 39 imaged filler files (matches grep line-for-line), gets the multi-step ledger arithmetic right, and ends the session at $6.06 with context to spare (73.5k/1M) vs $42.21 at 96% full. One caveat visible in the clip: the pxpipe arm needed a nudge to match the requested one-line output format.

Opus 4.8 (disabled by default) — same layout:

Opus-AB-Demo.mp4

Text needles read fine on both arms; the imaged phrase-count doesn't read on Opus — and pxpipe says so instead of fabricating a number. That misread rate is why Opus is opt-in.

Try it (30 seconds)

npx pxpipe-proxy                                  # proxy on 127.0.0.1:47821
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=http://127.0.0.1:47821 claude  # point Claude Code at it

Dashboard at http://127.0.0.1:47821/: tokens saved, every text→image conversion side by side, kill switch, live model chips. Responses stream normally — pxpipe compresses the request only, never the model's output. Recent turns stay text; the system prompt, tool docs, and older bulk history are imaged.

Offline export (no proxy)

You can render text, files, or diffs to PNG pages without running the proxy or connecting Claude Code:

npx pxpipe-proxy export src/
cat prompt.txt | npx pxpipe-proxy export --stdin
npx pxpipe-proxy export --git

If the package is installed, use pxpipe export instead of npx pxpipe-proxy export.

Each run writes a fresh pxpipe-export-XXXXXX/ output folder (the exact path is printed when the command finishes) containing page-*.png, factsheet.txt, manifest.json, and prompt.txt. Upload the PNG pages and paste the prompt into image-upload clients such as Cursor when you want dense visual context without running the proxy.

The honest part

  • It is lossy. Exact 12-char hex strings in dense imaged content: 13/15 on Fable 5, 0/15 on Opus, and 0/15 on Sol — misses are silent confabulations, not errors. Byte-exact values (IDs, hashes, secrets) must stay text; recent turns do. The factsheet selectively preserves up to 96 recognized precision-critical tokens, not every identifier. A dedicated verbatim-risk guard is not built yet.
  • Escape hatch: subagents on non-allowlisted models pass through as text — route byte-exact work there (CLAUDE_CODE_SUBAGENT_MODEL=claude-sonnet-4-6, or model: sonnet in agent frontmatter).
  • Real work: SWE-bench Lite pilot 10/10 both arms at −65% request size; SWE-bench Pro 14/19 ON vs 15/19 OFF at −60%, verdicts agree 18/19, and the single split re-resolved 3/3 on replication — run-to-run variance, not compression. Small n; receipts in eval/.
  • Workload-dependent. Wins on token-dense content (~1 char/token), loses money on sparse prose (~3.5 chars/token); a profitability gate (calibrated on N=391 production rows) images only where the math wins.
  • Client-dependent. Savings track uncached bulk the client still re-sends as text. Claude Code re-sends system + tools + history on /anthropic/messages and typically lands ~60–70%. Details and measured splits: docs/CACHING_AND_SAVINGS.md.
Model support and rendering details
  • Model scope: default PXPIPE_MODELS=claude-fable-5,gemini-3.6-flash. Sol, Opus 4.7/4.8, GPT 5.5, and Grok are opt-in only (dashboard chips or PXPIPE_MODELS). The exact Sol id still matters. Sibling variants such as gpt-5.6-terra do not inherit Sol's allowlist or render profile. PXPIPE_MODELS=off disables imaging. Everything else passes through byte-identical. On the GPT path, tool definitions stay native JSON and no Anthropic cache_control markers are used. Responses history compression recognizes completed function_call/function_call_output pairs, including OpenCode's parallel calls-then-outputs rounds: only old closed rounds are imaged atomically; every open call and malformed/orphan state remains native. The base profile keeps the newest six completed pairs and allows 32 images; Sol keeps one pair and allows 64 images, while Grok allows 24 images. Opt-in long-session coverage can be changed (defensive cap 100) with PXPIPE_GPT_HISTORY_MAX_IMAGES=48 after validating the provider's request cap.
  • Per-model rendering: opt-in gpt-5.6-sol uses a 152-column, 768px-wide 5×8 Spleen profile; Claude keeps its 312-column, 1568×728 5×8 Spleen profile. These are selected by exact model id, including history pages and profitability math. Recognized IDs can ride in the bounded factsheet, and recent/open tool state stays native. Sol receipts and profile evidence.
  • Grok 4.5 (opt-in): same production recipe as Sol (5×8 Spleen, IDS, text factsheet; Grok strip maxH 512). Off by default (not Fable-level pure-image). Enable with PXPIPE_MODELS=claude-fable-5,grok-4.5 or the dashboard chip. eval/grok-density/QUALITY_RESULTS.md.

Benchmark results and receipts

Model quality

This matrix shows coverage as well as scores. means the model was not run on that test; it does not mean zero. Arithmetic uses novel random-number problems. Gist, state, and never-stated probes share one corpus. Never-stated is confabulations, so lower is better.

model arithmetic (N=100) gist (N=98) state (N=18) never-stated (N=16) dense hex (N=15) profile provenance and receipts
claude-fable-5 100/100 98/98 18/18 0/16 13/15 June 2026 production profiles: arithmetic + hex, gist/state/guards
google/gemini-3.6-flash 100/100 98/98 18/18 0/16 14/15 current shipped profile: quality results
gpt-5.6-sol 98/100 83/98 17/18 4/16 0/15 current shipped profile: quality results
claude-opus-4-8 93/100 0/15 historical profile: arithmetic, dense hex
grok-4.5 82/100 83/98 13/18 0/16 0/15 current shipped profile: quality results
moonshotai/kimi-k3 79/100 84/98 15/18 1/16 0/15 generic GPT profile: quality results

The runs use different transports and profile generations, not one identical image geometry. Fable and Opus use Claude; Gemini uses Google AI Studio; Sol and Grok use Codex Responses; Kimi K3 uses Cloudflare's OpenAI-compatible transport. Current production profiles include the adjacent bounded factsheet; historical or pure-image exceptions are identified in the linked evaluation.

Model-specific evaluations

These are not cross-model comparisons. Every unlisted model is not run.

test model result evaluation and receipts
SWE-bench Lite claude-fable-5 pxpipe 10/10; text 10/10; −65% request size paired pilot
SWE-bench Pro claude-fable-5 pxpipe 14/19; text 15/19; −60% request size paired pilot
production-history row localization google/gemini-3.6-flash text 17/30; pxpipe 18/30 positional retrieval
production-history exact row google/gemini-3.6-flash text 3/30; pxpipe 3/30 positional retrieval

The SWE-bench runner is Claude Code/Fable-specific; no other model has an ON/OFF run. Gemini's positional-retrieval sweep is directional evidence, not a general Lost-in-the-Middle result.

Capacity / density (how many chars per vision-token?)

Measured by rendering this repo’s dense fixture through the real pipeline and pricing pixels at each family’s vision rate. Multiplier = measured chars/vision-token ÷ 4 (prose text baseline). Not a model-quality score.

family window as text (@4 c/tok) as pxpipe images density multiplier
claude-fable-5[1m] (default) 1M ~4.0M ~19.0M ~19.0 c/vt (exact 28px patches) ~4.8×
google/gemini-3.6-flash 1M ~4.0M ~21.3M ~21.3 c/vt (1,078 tok/page) ~5.3×

Regenerate: npx tsx scripts/gen-context-chart.ts · chart PNG docs/assets/context-window-chars.png.

The older GSM8K result is omitted because its training-data contamination can hide image misreads; the linked arithmetic evaluations use novel numbers.

How it works

model id ──► render profile ──► wrap/reflow bulk context ──► PNG[] + bounded factsheet

The proxy handles Anthropic Messages, OpenAI Responses and Chat Completions, and Google generateContent requests. It rewrites eligible bulk into image blocks and forwards the provider-native request, or bridges Anthropic Messages to a configured OpenAI-compatible provider. On Anthropic, the static prefix and prompt-cache boundary are preserved. Model-specific profiles control geometry, factsheets, history retention, and profitability, so sparse prose stays text. Events log to ~/.pxpipe/events.jsonl.

Library use (no proxy)

import { renderTextToImages, transformAnthropicMessages } from "pxpipe-proxy";

const { pages } = await renderTextToImages(toolResultText);     // pages[i].png: Uint8Array
const { body, applied, info } = await transformAnthropicMessages({
  body: requestBytes,
  model: "claude-fable-5",
});

options.keepSharp(block) pins blocks as text; options.emitRecoverable returns the originals of imaged blocks. Pure-JS runtime (Node and edge/Workers); @napi-rs/canvas is build-time only. Full API: src/core/index.ts.

Development

pnpm install && pnpm test
pnpm run build                # regenerates dist/

Windows is community-supported: primary development targets macOS/Linux, and Windows-specific fixes rely on contributor PRs (thanks @makoribrian).

FAQ

Is the headline end-to-end, or only on the requests you touched?

End-to-end, the whole bill. Most compression tools report savings only on the input slice they touched, which flatters the number. The end-to-end denominator is every production request: the small ones pxpipe correctly left untouched, all cache writes and reads, and all output tokens (which the proxy never compresses). On a 13,709-request snapshot that was 59% ($100 → ~$41); a later 8,904-compressed-request trace measured ~70%. Compressed-only runs higher (~72–74%) and is quoted separately, never as the headline. The exact figure is workload-dependent — reproduce it on your own log.

How is the math measured?

Both sides of the same request, at the same moment. For every /v1/messages POST the proxy fires a free count_tokens probe on the original uncompressed body (the counterfactual) in parallel with the real forward, and reads Anthropic's actually-billed usage block off the response. Both land in the same row of ~/.pxpipe/events.jsonl, so there is no turn-count or run-to-run confound. Dollar conversion uses Fable 5 list ratios: input ×1.0, cache write ×1.25, cache read ×0.1, output ×5. Cache pricing is applied identically to both sides, so the caching discount cancels and cannot be double-counted as "savings". Re-derive it yourself from the events log: the formula and field names are documented in src/core/baseline.ts.

What does it actually compress?

Three kinds of input blocks, each behind a profitability gate:

  1. large tool_result bodies (file reads, command output, logs) above ~6k chars of token-dense content
  2. older collapsed history: turns behind the live tail get re-rendered as image pages, recent turns always stay text
  3. the static cacheable system prompt + tool docs slab; appended non-cacheable system blocks stay live text so host custom instructions keep system-level salience

Everything else passes through byte-identical: your messages, recent turns, the model's output (it is the response, the proxy never touches it), sparse prose, and anything too small to win. Model defaults and detailed results are listed under model support and benchmarks.

Has it ever failed for real, outside the benchmarks?

Yes, once in weeks of daily use: the model recalled a person's name from imaged chat history and got it confidently wrong. No error, just a plausible wrong name. That is the documented failure mode: exact strings in imaged content are not byte-safe. Coding sessions tolerate this because the agent re-reads files before editing; pure chat recall has no such check. This failure mode is measured, not anecdotal: the legibility audit quantifies exact-string recall off rendered pages (blind reads top out at 63% on dense identifiers, with every miss predicted by a glyph-confusability matrix) and documents the shipped mitigations — page geometry clamped to the API's resample cap so billed pixels actually reach the vision encoder, and selected identifiers (SHAs, numbers) riding alongside as text.

Why are misses silent confabulations instead of read errors?

Because model vision is not OCR: the image becomes patch embeddings, never discrete characters, so there is no per-glyph confidence to fail loudly on. When pixels underdetermine a glyph, the language prior fills the gap with something plausible. Mechanism and receipts: docs/NOT-OCR.md.

Didn't DeepSeek-OCR show this doesn't hold up in practice?

No: it proved the channel works, using an encoder/decoder pair trained for the job. The skepticism dates from October 2025, when no stock production model could read dense renders; that changed with Fable 5 (0/15 verbatim hex on Opus 4.8 vs 13/15 on Fable 5, same pages). Timeline and per-model numbers: docs/NOT-OCR.md.

Why does the README read like an AI wrote it?

Because one did. Most of this repo's commits — the code and the docs — were authored by Opus/Fable agent sessions running behind pxpipe itself, reading their own collapsed history as image pages while they worked.

Additional limitations

  • PNG encoding adds latency to large requests before they leave.
  • ASCII/Latin-1 well tested; CJK works but conservatively.

Research status

Current as of 2026-07-22. The broad conclusion from the 2026-07-05 pass still holds: exact recall is limited by pixels per glyph, so rendering changes do not eliminate errors at profitable density. A later glyph-style A/B did find a useful local improvement: repainting K reduced Fable's H/K error from 47.2% to 18.7% without changing geometry or token cost. It shipped, but exact control IDs did not improve. See FINDINGS.md, 2026-07-19 entry.

Runtime canary + text re-fetch and surrogate-reader pre-flight remain untested. The release tripwire remains a resolution sweep for each new model; a model that reads production cells near 100% would permit higher density.

Effective-context benefits remain unproven. The production-history results above are directional evidence, not a general context-window or long-task accuracy claim.

Community projects

Third-party projects listed here are not maintained or supported by pxpipe.

  • pxpipe-windows — Windows support for pxpipe mitm (node-forge CA in place of openssl, Task Scheduler autostart).
  • OmniGlyph — A community-maintained project derived from pxpipe and used by OmniRoute.

License

MIT.

About

cut Fable 5 token usage by rendering text context as images

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

Sponsor this project

Packages

Used by

Contributors

Languages

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.