Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Consider changing license to MIT #187

Copy link
Copy link

Description

@eriwen
Issue body actions

The reason I originally selected the Unlicense when this project began was to maximize use of the library. However, since then I've come to learn that such a license actually prevents use and contribution by some organizations because Unlicense is not an OSI approved license and is a little risky legally.

I would like to consider changing the licensing to MIT as the best, most open alternative recognized by the broader OSS community. The goal, as always, is to maximize the applicability of the software.

I want to know what you think. Any such license change will affect all stacktrace.js projects, and will be effective as of the next major version, 2.0.

Please use the 👍 and 👎 reactions or discuss below.

Reactions are currently unavailable

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.