-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.9k
Add URL to reference of Minka paper used in PCA #19207
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Unfortunately, I know find myself wit ha linting error, that I don't understand. Any advice? Do you see the problem? |
Fixed error and squashed commit. |
linter failed with
I rebased on current main, but that did not change the situation. Probably related to |
Yes it should be fixed by #19237 |
This PR adds a link to the reference of the Minka paper implemented in the PCA for `method='mle'`. That paper is cited twice: In the method `_asses_dimension` I add a direct link to the exact paper, in the general docstring of the PCA I add a reference to Minka's page with the algorithm, because on that page there is an extended and updated write-up on this method in addition to a copy of the original paper. That write-up is more useful as an introduction to the method, but obviously has different equation numbers etc. thus it is not a good link for the `_asses_dimension` method, which explicitly refers to "equation (31) from the paper".
applied comments from review, homogenized layout for all references in the main PCA docstring
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks @hamogu |
This PR adds a link to the reference of the Minka paper implemented in the PCA for
method='mle'
. That paper is cited twice: In the method_asses_dimension
I add a direct link to the exact paper, in the general docstring of the PCA I add a reference to Minka's page with the algorithm, because on that page there is an extended and updated write-up on this method in addition to a copy of the original paper. That write-up is more useful as an introduction to the method, but obviously has different equation numbers etc. thus it is not a good link for the_asses_dimension
method, which explicitly refers to "equation (31) from the paper".Reference Issues/PRs
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Any other comments?