• Implemented a deep learning model (a BILSTM tagger) to detect code switching (language mixture) and return both a list of tokens and a list with one language label per token.
• To simplify our work was focussed on English and Spanish, so we were only needed to return for each token either 'en', 'es' or 'other'.

• For code switching we will focus on Spanish and English, and the data provided is derived from http://www.care4lang.seas.gwu.edu/cs2/call.html.

• This data is a collection of tweets, in particular we have three files for the training set and three for the validation set:

• offsets_mod.tsv

• tweets.tsv

• data.tsv

• The first file has the id information about the tweets, together with the tokens positions and the gold labels.

• The second has the ids and the actual tweet text.

• The third has the combination of the previous files, with the tokens of each sentence and the gold labels associated. More specifically, the columns are: offsets_mod.tsv: {tweet_id, user_id, start, end, gold label} tweets.tsv: {tweet_id, user_id, tweet text} data.tsv: {tweet_id, user_id, start, end, token, gold label}

The gold labels can be one of three:

• en
• es
• other

For this task, we were required to implement a BILSTM tagger.

• We tried to implement a BiLSTM model with character embeddings and see how our model performs for this task.
• To encode the character-level information, we will use character embeddings and a LSTM to encode every word to a vector.

• There were lines in the *_data.tsv files which had " as a token and was inhibittng the entire reading of file in pandas read_csv function.
• Hence we removed all the lines from both train as well as dev data files which had " in them.
• Keeping a tweet together as this will later adds to context if our model can learn that too.
• We created a list of list of tuples, in which each word/token was as a tuple with it's tag and inside a list which contains all the tuples of words from a single tweet.

• Our system achieved an accuracy of 96.2% when trained and tested on the train_data.tsv file only.

• The confusion matrix for the result is as below:

  	0	1	2
  0	1816	45	26
  1	96	4651	70
  2	65	51	2545

• The Classification report is as below:

  	precision	recall	f1-score	support
  Other	0.92	0.96	0.94	1887
  En	0.98	0.97	0.97	4817
  Es	0.96	0.96	0.96	2661

  ---

• Our system achieved an accuracy of 96.5% when trained on the train_data.tsv file and tested on dev_data.tsv file.

• The confusion matrix for the result is as below:

  	0	1	2
  0	17929	156	230
  1	876	45412	618
  2	796	469	24715

• The Classification report is as below:

  	precision	recall	f1-score	support
  Other	0.91	0.98	0.95	18315
  En	0.99	0.97	0.98	46906
  Es	0.97	0.95	0.96	25980

  ---

• Keep the train and test dataset similar to the format of train_data.tsv in the same directory as the script_task3.py.
• run the command python3 script_task3.py train_data.tsv test_data.tsv
• It'll show two images, 1. The variation of loss and validation loss during training. 2. The confusion matrix image.
• At last will print the confusion matrix as well as classification report along with the accuracy of the madel.