Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

bpo-22005: Fixed unpickling instances of datetime classes pickled by Python 2.#794

Closed
serhiy-storchaka wants to merge 12 commits into
python:masterpython/cpython:masterfrom
serhiy-storchaka:datetime-compat-unpickleserhiy-storchaka/cpython:datetime-compat-unpickleCopy head branch name to clipboard
Closed

bpo-22005: Fixed unpickling instances of datetime classes pickled by Python 2.#794
serhiy-storchaka wants to merge 12 commits into
python:masterpython/cpython:masterfrom
serhiy-storchaka:datetime-compat-unpickleserhiy-storchaka/cpython:datetime-compat-unpickleCopy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@serhiy-storchaka

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka commented Mar 23, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

errors='surrogateescape' should be used for successful decoding.

encoding='latin1' should be used for successful decoding.

https://bugs.python.org/issue22005

…Python 2.

errors='surrogateescape' should be used for successful decoding.
@mention-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@serhiy-storchaka, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @abalkin, @tim-one and @birkenfeld to be potential reviewers.

Comment thread Lib/datetime.py Outdated
1 <= year[2] <= 12:
if (month is None and
isinstance(year, (bytes, str)) and len(year) == 4 and
1 <= ord(year[2:3])&0xFF <= 12):

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand how the last condition works. Is it supposed to allow str year with year[2] outside of 8-bit range?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the third byte is in the range 0x00-0x7f, it is decoded to the character in the range U+0000-U+007f. If it is in the range 0x80-0xff, it is decoded to the character in the range U+dc80-U+dcff.

Hmm, but in the latter case ord(year[2:3])&0xFF >= 0x80, and that condition is false. &0xFF is not needed in this case. But '&0x7F' in other two cases are needed.

@serhiy-storchaka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Tests on Travis CI are failed for unrelated cause.

@serhiy-storchaka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The Travis CI build is failed due to some glitches. For a copy of this PR #11017 all tests are passed.

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka deleted the datetime-compat-unpickle branch December 7, 2018 11:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting review type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.