[3.6] bpo-31641: Allow arbitrary iterables in concurrent.futures.as_completed() (GH-3830)#3831
Merged
ambv merged 1 commit intoSep 29, 2017
python:3.6python/cpython:3.6from
miss-islington:backport-574562c-3.6miss-islington/cpython:backport-574562c-3.6Copy head branch name to clipboard
Merged
[3.6] bpo-31641: Allow arbitrary iterables in concurrent.futures.as_completed() (GH-3830)#3831ambv merged 1 commit intopython:3.6python/cpython:3.6from miss-islington:backport-574562c-3.6miss-islington/cpython:backport-574562c-3.6Copy head branch name to clipboard
concurrent.futures.as_completed() (GH-3830)#3831ambv merged 1 commit into
python:3.6python/cpython:3.6from
miss-islington:backport-574562c-3.6miss-islington/cpython:backport-574562c-3.6Copy head branch name to clipboard
Conversation
…completed()` (pythonGH-3830) This was possible before. pythonGH-1560 introduced a regression after 3.6.2 got released where only sequences were accepted now. This commit addresses this problem. (cherry picked from commit 574562c)
|
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). Unfortunately we couldn't find an account corresponding to your GitHub username on bugs.python.org (b.p.o) to verify you have signed the CLA (this might be simply due to a missing "GitHub Name" entry in your b.p.o account settings). This is necessary for legal reasons before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it! |
Contributor
Author
|
@ambv: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks, @ambv! |
ned-deily
pushed a commit
to ned-deily/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 3, 2017
…completed()` (pythonGH-3830) (python#3831) This was possible before. pythonGH-1560 introduced a regression after 3.6.2 got released where only sequences were accepted now. This commit addresses this problem. (cherry picked from commit 574562c)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was possible before. GH-1560 introduced a regression after 3.6.2 got
released where only sequences were accepted now. This commit addresses this
problem.
(cherry picked from commit 574562c)
https://bugs.python.org/issue31641