Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

[3.10] bpo-44490: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048)#27220

Closed
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.10python/cpython:3.10from
miss-islington:backport-bf89ff9-3.10miss-islington/cpython:backport-bf89ff9-3.10Copy head branch name to clipboard
Closed

[3.10] bpo-44490: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048)#27220
miss-islington wants to merge 1 commit into
python:3.10python/cpython:3.10from
miss-islington:backport-bf89ff9-3.10miss-islington/cpython:backport-bf89ff9-3.10Copy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@miss-islington

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jul 18, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(cherry picked from commit bf89ff9)

Co-authored-by: Yurii Karabas 1998uriyyo@gmail.com

https://bugs.python.org/issue44490

…onGH-27048)

(cherry picked from commit bf89ff9)

Co-authored-by: Yurii Karabas <1998uriyyo@gmail.com>
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 3 of 5 required status checks are expected..

@gvanrossum gvanrossum changed the title [3.10] bpo-44490: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) bpo-44490: [3.10] Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) Jul 18, 2021
@gvanrossum gvanrossum changed the title bpo-44490: [3.10] Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) bpo-44490 [3.10]: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) Jul 18, 2021
@gvanrossum gvanrossum changed the title bpo-44490 [3.10]: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) [3.10] bpo-44490: Improve typing module compatibility with types.Union (GH-27048) Jul 18, 2021
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@uriyyo and @gvanrossum: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@uriyyo and @gvanrossum: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: Required status check "bedevere/news" is expected..

1 similar comment
@miss-islington

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: Required status check "bedevere/news" is expected..

@gvanrossum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sorry for the spurious title changes. But I fear the news check is stuck?

@Fidget-Spinner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sorry for the spurious title changes. But I fear the news check is stuck?

Yeah I gave up on this PR and opened another one at GH-27222 to rerun that check.

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-bf89ff9-3.10 branch July 18, 2021 07:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.