Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

[3.8] bpo-42536: GC track recycled tuples (GH-23623)#23652

Merged
pablogsal merged 1 commit into
python:3.8python/cpython:3.8from
brandtbucher:backport-226a012-3.8brandtbucher/cpython:backport-226a012-3.8Copy head branch name to clipboard
Dec 7, 2020
Merged

[3.8] bpo-42536: GC track recycled tuples (GH-23623)#23652
pablogsal merged 1 commit into
python:3.8python/cpython:3.8from
brandtbucher:backport-226a012-3.8brandtbucher/cpython:backport-226a012-3.8Copy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@brandtbucher

@brandtbucher brandtbucher commented Dec 5, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

CC @pablogsal, just to make sure I'm doing the manual backport with cherry_picker correctly (automatic backporting failed).

Several built-in and standard library types now ensure that their internal result tuples are always tracked by the garbage collector:

  • collections.OrderedDict.items
  • dict.items
  • enumerate
  • functools.reduce
  • itertools.combinations
  • itertools.combinations_with_replacement
  • itertools.permutations
  • itertools.product
  • itertools.zip_longest
  • zip

Previously, they could have become untracked by a prior garbage collection.
(cherry picked from commit 226a012)

https://bugs.python.org/issue42536

Several built-in and standard library types now ensure that their internal result tuples are always tracked by the garbage collector:

- collections.OrderedDict.items
- dict.items
- enumerate
- functools.reduce
- itertools.combinations
- itertools.combinations_with_replacement
- itertools.permutations
- itertools.product
- itertools.zip_longest
- zip

Previously, they could have become untracked by a prior garbage collection.
(cherry picked from commit 226a012)
@brandtbucher

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Not sure what's up with Travis. It looks like it's using an old (perhaps 3.5 system python?) python3 executable when running make -j4 regen-all:

python3 ./Tools/scripts/update_file.py ./Include/graminit.h ./Include/graminit.h.new
  File "./Tools/clinic/clinic.py", line 1772
    filename_new = f"{filename}.new"
                                   ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax

@brandtbucher

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I know Travis has been problematic in the past. I see this same failure on several other recent 3.8 backports as well, so I think it can safely be ignored here.

(I'll go ahead and open an issue for it, though.)

@brandtbucher

brandtbucher commented Dec 5, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

(I'll go ahead and open an issue for it, though.)

bpo-42574

@pablogsal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

so I think it can safely be ignored here.

Yeah, let's track that issue separately

@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit 7c79798 into python:3.8 Dec 7, 2020
@brandtbucher brandtbucher deleted the backport-226a012-3.8 branch July 21, 2022 19:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.