bpo-29981: Update Index for set, dict, and generator 'comprehensions'#20272
bpo-29981: Update Index for set, dict, and generator 'comprehensions'#20272akuchling merged 7 commits intopython:masterpython/cpython:masterfrom DahlitzFlorian:fix-issue-29981DahlitzFlorian/cpython:fix-issue-29981Copy head branch name to clipboard
Conversation
remilapeyre
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for improving the documentation @DahlitzFlorian !
Co-authored-by: Rémi Lapeyre <remi.lapeyre@henki.fr>
|
Thanks @remilapeyre for the review! I applied some of your suggestions. However, I would not change Use to Using as Use is the imperative form and highly preferred. See also: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/995/files#r120774265 |
akuchling
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The text reads well. I only noticed two minor grammar corrections. Thanks!
|
Thanks for the review @akuchling, I applied the requested changes. |
|
Thanks for accepting the PR @akuchling! Is there anything left to do or can it be merged? |
|
@DahlitzFlorian: on re-reviewing this, can you please move the 'Sets/Dicts can be created...' paragraphs in |
|
@akuchling changed it accordingly, thanks for the hint! |
|
Without looking at the resulting html, the additions look good to me. I think this should have a news entry such as: |
|
I think most documentation changes don't need a news entry, unless they're doing something large like adding a section or a whole new document. "Improved docs on topic X" doesn't tell you very much, and users don't need to modify code to accommodate doc changes. |
|
Thanks @DahlitzFlorian for the PR, and @akuchling for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8, 3.9. |
|
GH-22836 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
… comprehensions'(pythonGH-20272) Co-authored-by: Rémi Lapeyre <remi.lapeyre@henki.fr> (cherry picked from commit 2d55aa9) Co-authored-by: Florian Dahlitz <f2dahlitz@freenet.de>
|
GH-22837 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
… comprehensions'(pythonGH-20272) Co-authored-by: Rémi Lapeyre <remi.lapeyre@henki.fr> (cherry picked from commit 2d55aa9) Co-authored-by: Florian Dahlitz <f2dahlitz@freenet.de>
|
I have a lower threshhold -- is something added that users might want to read. But whoever does the work to push a PR over the finish line gets to decide. |
|
Thanks for the guidance @remilapeyre and @akuchling 🎉 |
… comprehensions'(pythonGH-20272) Co-authored-by: Rémi Lapeyre <remi.lapeyre@henki.fr>
A similar PR (#995) was made back in 2017, but was closed due to inactivity. With this PR I propose nearly the same changes.
@terryjreedy mentioned that he does not like the "all or part of" phrase. As the already existing list comprehension's glossary entry has a similar phrasing, I suggest to keep it.
I build the changes locally and the index was updated accordingly.
https://bugs.python.org/issue29981