bpo-37860: Add netlify deploy preview for docs #15288
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
| # Requirements for docs build on netlify | ||
| # Pin sphinx to version specified in .travis.yml | ||
| sphinx==2.0.1 | ||
| blurb | ||
| python-docs-theme |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| 3.7 | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Could this be specified in netlify.toml too instead of a special-purpose file?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
| [build] | ||
| base = "Doc/" | ||
| command = "make html" | ||
| publish = "Doc/build/html" |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Mariatta Do you think that this should be pinned or float upward?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I pinned it because that's how it was in .travis.yml.
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/.travis.yml#L58
Actually, do you think it might be better to make .travis.yml to read from Doc/requirements.txt instead of specifying its own versions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's do this. Keep it pinned for now but add a comment:
# Pin sphinx to version specified in .travis.ymlon the line above Sphinx in requirements.txtUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done. I think it might be better to just include
python -m pip install -r Docs/requirements.txtin.travis.ymlthough, so that we don't have to keep two files in sync, unless there's a reason not to do so?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@epicfaace For now, the least disruptive change was to make the modification here. Ideally, there wouldn't be duplication. Would you like to open an issue suggesting the above.