We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
code_richcompare
This is a sub-issue for #146102 and more details can be found here.
In code_richcompare on line 2608, PyObject_RichCompareBool can return an error (-1), but that is treated incorrectly since !(-1) == 0 . Reproducer:
PyObject_RichCompareBool
!(-1) == 0
class BadStr(str): _armed = False def __eq__(self, other): if BadStr._armed and isinstance(other, str) and str.__eq__(self, other): raise RuntimeError("Poison!") return str.__eq__(self, other) def __hash__(self): return str.__hash__(self) c1 = compile("pass", "test", "exec") c2 = c1.replace(co_name=BadStr("poison")) c3 = compile("pass", "poison", "exec") BadStr._armed = True c2 == c3 # assertion: !_PyErr_Occurred(tstate)
CPython main branch
Linux
Bug report
Bug description:
This is a sub-issue for #146102 and more details can be found here.
In
code_richcompareon line 2608,PyObject_RichCompareBoolcan return an error (-1), but that is treated incorrectly since!(-1) == 0. Reproducer:CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
code_richcomparewhenPyObject_RichCompareBoolfails #146200