You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a user, when I'm implementing my own StorageAdapter, I find the parameters defined by the interface to be a bit limiting. Specifically, the uploadFile, downloadFile and deleteFile methods. In order to interface with my own backend, I need more information than just the filename or uri, I specifically need some of the information from the attachment record, including the additional columns I've defined.
For my own use case, I've resorted to stuffing any information I need to process the file to the filename of the record, which works - however this seems a bit hacky.
Is there any possibility of having this interface expanded to provide pass alone the attachment record?
As a user, when I'm implementing my own
StorageAdapter, I find the parameters defined by the interface to be a bit limiting. Specifically, theuploadFile,downloadFileanddeleteFilemethods. In order to interface with my own backend, I need more information than just the filename or uri, I specifically need some of the information from the attachment record, including the additional columns I've defined.For my own use case, I've resorted to stuffing any information I need to process the file to the filename of the record, which works - however this seems a bit hacky.
Is there any possibility of having this interface expanded to provide pass alone the attachment record?