Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Conversation

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis commented Dec 7, 2017

Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized after
the v8::HandleScope is created, not before.

Apparently test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: #17496
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/11962/

Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: nodejs#17496
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. labels Dec 7, 2017
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

re: testing … maybe just add a SealHandleScope to maxAsyncCallStackDepthChanged() (and other methods that should have one)?

Sorry, I see that’s kind of what already was triggering the assertion in the first place. Not sure how to test it either then.

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis closed this Dec 9, 2017
bnoordhuis added a commit to bnoordhuis/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2017
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: nodejs#17496
PR-URL: nodejs#17539
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: #17496
PR-URL: #17539
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: #17496
PR-URL: #17539
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2017
@gibfahn
Copy link
Member

gibfahn commented Dec 20, 2017

Missing landed in

Landed in df79b7d821

gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: #17496
PR-URL: #17539
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Fix a regression that was introduced in commit 5886e20 ("inspector:
track async stacks when necessary") and that I overlooked during review:
the persistent handle with the callback must be rematerialized *after*
the `v8::HandleScope` is created, not before.

Apparently `test/sequential/test-inspector-async-call-stack.js` has
no test coverage for this scenario and I'm out of good ideas on how
to create a concise and reliable test case.

Fixes: #17496
PR-URL: #17539
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.