Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Appearance settings

Generalise FunOrder #2048

Copy link
Copy link
Open
Open
Generalise FunOrder#2048
Copy link

Description

@agontard
agontard
opened on Jul 22, 2026
Issue body actions

In the following:

analysis/classical/boolp.v

Lines 950 to 951 in 8d9538a

HB.instance Definition _ := @Order.isPOrder.Build
fun_display (aT -> T) lef ltf ltf_def lef_refl lef_anti lef_trans.

A->B is declared as a porderType when B is one. Wouldn't it be better to first declare A -> B as a preorderType when B is a preorderType?

Reactions are currently unavailable

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions
    Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.