You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
i can think of few use cases where i would use named graphs, possibly it could work similar to level-sublevel ?
i would like it mostly for provenance, so when i aggregate data from various sources i can keep it in named graphs!
for example if one publishes list of one's friends using foaf:knows predicate, one could also add triple stating that https://twitter.com/pontifex knows her/him. I might like to check such claims for example against http://vatican.va and would prefer not to put everything into the same graph...
i can think of few use cases where i would use named graphs, possibly it could work similar to level-sublevel ?
i would like it mostly for provenance, so when i aggregate data from various sources i can keep it in named graphs!
for example if one publishes list of one's friends using foaf:knows predicate, one could also add triple stating that https://twitter.com/pontifex knows her/him. I might like to check such claims for example against http://vatican.va and would prefer not to put everything into the same graph...