You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Token-based usage is a good direction, but the current cost curve can make usage feel expensive very quickly. For many users, that becomes a barrier to continued use and slower growth.
Why this matters
Affordability: heavy usage can become too expensive too fast
Choice: users should be able to pick a model that fits their budget and workload
Retention: lower-cost options can make Copilot easier to keep using long term
Proposal
Consider supporting lower-cost or open-weight models such as DeepSeek or Kimi as additional options.
That could make Copilot:
more affordable
more flexible
less punishing for users who burn through tokens quickly
better aligned with different usage levels
This is not a request to replace the current approach — just to add more affordable model options so users can choose what fits their budget and workload.
Token-based usage is a good direction, but the current cost curve can make usage feel expensive very quickly. For many users, that becomes a barrier to continued use and slower growth.
Why this matters
Proposal
Consider supporting lower-cost or open-weight models such as DeepSeek or Kimi as additional options.
That could make Copilot:
This is not a request to replace the current approach — just to add more affordable model options so users can choose what fits their budget and workload.