You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
https://github.com/foundry-rs/forge-std/blob/37a37ab73364d6644bfe11edf88a07880f99bd56/src/StdStorage.sol#L50C27-L50C32
I ran into a problem lately regarding to stdStorage.finds, where I used a TransparentUpgradeableProxy contract in a project, and then run finds on the implementation contract which is the standard procedure, and I found the slot I wanted in my unit test, but what puzzled me was that the forge coverage failed because the slot couldn't be found. Then I dug deeper into the source code of StdStorage, and I found that during test phase, the lengths of the reads (bytes32[] memory reads,) = vm.accesses(address(who)); was 1 while the length was 4 during the coverage phase. and all 4 elements in reads array during coverage phase are exactly the same. So I'm wondering if the reads array should be deduped and if this is a potential bug?
https://github.com/foundry-rs/forge-std/blob/37a37ab73364d6644bfe11edf88a07880f99bd56/src/StdStorage.sol#L50C27-L50C32
I ran into a problem lately regarding to
stdStorage.finds, where I used a TransparentUpgradeableProxy contract in a project, and then runfindson the implementation contract which is the standard procedure, and I found the slot I wanted in my unit test, but what puzzled me was that theforge coveragefailed because the slot couldn't be found. Then I dug deeper into the source code ofStdStorage, and I found that during test phase, the lengths of the reads(bytes32[] memory reads,) = vm.accesses(address(who));was 1 while the length was 4 during the coverage phase. and all 4 elements inreadsarray during coverage phase are exactly the same. So I'm wondering if thereadsarray should be deduped and if this is a potential bug?