"Do not expand the theory. Sharpen the blade."
This repository presents a calibrated model for the breakdown of quantum unitarity at macroscopic scales. We derive a fundamental mass threshold where quantum coherence spontaneously decays due to interaction with the cosmological acceleration horizon.
| Parameter | Value | Physical Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| M_c | 5.29 × 10⁻¹⁶ kg |
Universal critical mass |
| τ_c | 2.18 seconds |
Intrinsic coherence time at M_c |
| α | 2.0 |
Power law exponent |
| R_c | 386 nm |
Silica sphere radius at M_c |
| M_c | 3.19 × 10¹¹ Da |
In atomic mass units |
The critical mass derives from 8-dimensional phase space geometry:
Where:
m_P ≈ 2.17 × 10⁻⁸ kg— Planck massa_0 ≈ 6.8 × 10⁻¹⁰ m/s²— Cosmological acceleration (c · H₀)a_P ≈ 5.56 × 10⁵¹ m/s²— Planck acceleration
The relativistic phase space of a particle is 8-dimensional:
Projection from 8D volume to 1D mass parameter yields the eighth root.
Derived from gravitational self-energy (Penrose-like):
For masses above threshold:
Four-panel visualization: (a) Coherence time vs mass, (b) Decoherence rate, (c) Visibility decay, (d) Parameter space regions
Comparison with experimental scenarios and competing collapse models (CSL, Diósi-Penrose)
Decoherence rate predictions: M_c vs CSL, GRW, and Diósi-Penrose across mass range
| Experiment | M/M_c | τ(M) | Testable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large Molecule Interferometry | ≪ 1 | ∞ | Below threshold |
| Levitated Nanoparticle (small) | ≪ 1 | ∞ | Below threshold |
| Nanoparticle @ M_c | 1.0 | ~2.2s | Threshold |
| MAQRO Target Mass | 1.9 | 0.61s | Yes |
| Large Nanosphere | 18.9 | 6.1ms | Yes |
| Micromechanical Oscillator | 1889 | 0.6μs | Yes |
- Mass: 10⁻¹⁵ kg (≈ 2× M_c)
- Predicted coherence time: 0.61 seconds
- Time to 50% visibility: ~63 milliseconds
- Verdict: Stable interference for t > 1s falsifies the theory
The theory is falsified if:
| Criterion | Condition |
|---|---|
| Coherence limit | V > 50% observed for M ≥ 10⁻¹⁴ kg at t > 1 second |
| No threshold | Coherence observed for M ≫ M_c at t ≫ τ(M) |
| Wrong scaling | Observed α ≠ 2 |
| Environmental dependence | τ increases with isolation for M > 5×10⁻¹⁵ kg |
limits/
├── README.md # This file
├── index.html # Web article (full paper)
├── ESTRATEGIA_MC_RESEARCH.md # Strategic research roadmap
│
├── massa_critica/ # Original hypothesis
│ ├── README.md # Full derivation (English)
│ └── hipotese_colapso_quantico/ # Portuguese version
│
├── simulations/ # Python framework
│ ├── constants.py # Physical constants & M_c
│ ├── calibration.py # Model calibration
│ ├── collapse_dynamics.py # Temporal models
│ ├── decoherence_models.py # CSL, GRW, DP, M_c
│ └── experimental_predictions.py # Concrete predictions
│
└── ajustefino/ # Background materials
# Print calibrated constants
python -c "from simulations.constants import print_constants; print_constants()"
# Run full calibration analysis
cd simulations && python calibration.py
# Generate experimental predictions
cd simulations && python experimental_predictions.py============================================================
PHYSICAL CONSTANTS FOR M_c RESEARCH
============================================================
--- CRITICAL MASS (CENTRAL PREDICTION) ---
M_c = m_P × Xi^(1/8) = 5.2926e-16 kg
M_c in Daltons = 3.1873e+11 Da
--- CALIBRATED MODEL PARAMETERS ---
τ_c (coherence @ M_c) = 2.1763e+00 s (2.18 seconds)
α (power law exponent) = 2.0
--- EXPERIMENTAL SCALES ---
Silica sphere radius @ M_c = 385.8 nm
============================================================
Collapse Time vs Mass (Multiple Exponents)
Coherence time τ(M) for different power law exponents α = 1, 2, 4, 8
- Verlinde, E. (2011). On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton. JHEP 1104:029.
- Verlinde, E. (2017). Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe. SciPost Phys. 2, 016.
- Penrose, R. (1996). On Gravity's role in Quantum State Reduction. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 28, 581.
- Diósi, L. (1987). A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of quantum mechanics. Phys. Lett. A 120, 377.
- Bassi, A. et al. (2013). Models of wave-function collapse. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 471.
- Romero-Isart, O. (2011). Quantum Superposition of Massive Objects. Phys. Rev. A 84, 052121.
- Kaltenbaek, R. et al. (2016). MAQRO: 2015 Update. EPJ Quantum Technology 3, 5.
Douglas H. M. Fulber
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
January 2026
| Component | Status |
|---|---|
| Theoretical derivation | |
| Model calibration | |
| Numerical simulations | |
| Experimental predictions | |
| Paper 0 (derivation) | |
| Experimental collaboration |
The number M_c ~ 10⁻¹⁶ kg bites reality.
Explore where this number makes predictions.





