Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

[release/9.0-staging] Disable GS cookie checks for LightUnwind - #109530

#109530
Merged
jkotas merged 2 commits into
release/9.0-stagingdotnet/runtime:release/9.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-109524-to-release/9.0-stagingdotnet/runtime:backport/pr-109524-to-release/9.0-stagingCopy head branch name to clipboard
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

[release/9.0-staging] Disable GS cookie checks for LightUnwind#109530
jkotas merged 2 commits into
release/9.0-stagingdotnet/runtime:release/9.0-stagingfrom
backport/pr-109524-to-release/9.0-stagingdotnet/runtime:backport/pr-109524-to-release/9.0-stagingCopy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #109524 to release/9.0-staging

/cc @jkotas

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

Runtime crash when Assembly.Load or other APIs that requires stackwalk to find the calling method gets called from a method that uses stackalloc.

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

.NET 8 -> .NET 9 regression introduced by #99137 (runtime simplification)

Testing

Regression test added

Risk

Low. The fix is suppressing superfluous sanity checks.

LightUnwind does not track sufficient context to compute GS cookie address

Fixes #109242
@ghost ghost added the area-VM-coreclr label Nov 5, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @mangod9
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@jkotas
jkotas requested a review from janvorli November 5, 2024 01:20

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. we will take for consideration in 9.0.x

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Nov 5, 2024
@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added this to the 9.0.x milestone Nov 5, 2024

@janvorli janvorli left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you

@rbhanda rbhanda modified the milestones: 9.0.x, 9.0.1 Nov 5, 2024
@rbhanda rbhanda added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Nov 5, 2024
@carlossanlop carlossanlop modified the milestones: 9.0.1, 9.0.2 Nov 21, 2024
@jeffschwMSFT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@janvorli can you take a look at the PR failures and merge when ready?

@jkotas

jkotas commented Jan 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ba-g all known infrastructure and test errors

@jkotas
jkotas merged commit f09d2e8 into release/9.0-staging Jan 9, 2025
@jkotas
jkotas deleted the backport/pr-109524-to-release/9.0-staging branch January 9, 2025 22:55
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 9, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-VM-coreclr Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.