Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

[TEST] Low coverage on utility_functions.py #830

Copy link
Copy link

Description

@genedan
Issue body actions

Description

I'm working on this. Most likely this will require 2 or 3 PRs since the missing lines cover a variety of different functions (I/O, patsy, model diagnostics).

Image

Is your feature request aligned with the scope of the package?

  • Yes, absolutely!
  • No, but it's still worth discussing.
  • N/A (this request is not a codebase enhancement).

Describe the solution you'd like, or your current workaround.

No response

Do you have any additional supporting notes?

No response

Reactions are currently unavailable

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Fields

Priority

Low

Scope

None yet

Effort

Medium

Projects

Status
In progress
Show more project fields

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.