TST: Skip segfault test case instead of xfail#8160
TST: Skip segfault test case instead of xfail#8160
Conversation
|
Hi there @pllim 👋 - thanks for the pull request! I'm just a friendly 🤖 that checks for issues related to the changelog and making sure that this pull request is milestoned and labeled correctly. This is mainly intended for the maintainers, so if you are not a maintainer you can ignore this, and a maintainer will let you know if any action is required on your part 😃. Everything looks good from my point of view! 👍 If there are any issues with this message, please report them here. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8160 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.92% 86.92%
=======================================
Files 383 383
Lines 57860 57860
Branches 1056 1056
=======================================
Hits 50296 50296
Misses 6950 6950
Partials 614 614
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
TST: Skip segfault test case instead of xfail
Fix #8148
I am very perplexed on why this only happens to me. But given that this particular test has a known recursion problem, it really does not matter whether we skip or xfail, but unfortunately the latter gives me seg fault.