You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, paimon-python leverages Py4J to reuse Java's read/write capabilities, with data serialization between Java and Python processes handled through ArrowUtils.serializeToIpc. This implementation has several performance bottlenecks:
Process Communication Overhead: The Py4J bridge requires inter-process communication (IPC) between Java and Python processes, introducing significant latency.
Serialization/Deserialization Cost: Each data transfer requires serialization to Arrow IPC format and subsequent deserialization, which is computationally expensive.
Memory Management Complexity: The current implementation requires careful management of memory allocators and resources across process boundaries.
Proposed Solution
We propose to refactor paimon-python to use native PyArrow implementations for read/write operations. This would:
Eliminate Process Communication: Remove the need for Py4J bridge and IPC, allowing direct memory access.
Reduce Serialization Overhead: Enable zero-copy data transfer between Python and native code.
Current Implementation and Issues
Currently, paimon-python leverages Py4J to reuse Java's read/write capabilities, with data serialization between Java and Python processes handled through
ArrowUtils.serializeToIpc. This implementation has several performance bottlenecks:Proposed Solution
We propose to refactor paimon-python to use native PyArrow implementations for read/write operations. This would: