Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

GEODE-10237: Remove no-ack from testThinClientTransactionsWithSticky - #959

#959
Open
mmartell wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:developapache/geode-native:developfrom
mmartell:GEODE-10237-fix-transactions-testmmartell/geode-native:GEODE-10237-fix-transactions-testCopy head branch name to clipboard
Open

GEODE-10237: Remove no-ack from testThinClientTransactionsWithSticky#959
mmartell wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:developapache/geode-native:developfrom
mmartell:GEODE-10237-fix-transactions-testmmartell/geode-native:GEODE-10237-fix-transactions-testCopy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@mmartell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This removes the no-ack functionality from this test, which fails regularly in the CI.

@mmartell
mmartell force-pushed the GEODE-10237-fix-transactions-test branch from ba07d13 to fa70213 Compare April 17, 2022 15:31

@pdxcodemonkey pdxcodemonkey left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is, IMO, too much code to duplicate, and adding the new file rather than editing the existing one really obscures the nature of this change. Please try just editing ThinClientTrasactions.hpp and resubmit.

- no need for an additional header file
- just refactor the original include file
@mmartell

mmartell commented May 2, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This is, IMO, too much code to duplicate, and adding the new file rather than editing the existing one really obscures the nature of this change. Please try just editing ThinClientTrasactions.hpp and resubmit.

Good catch Blake! Not sure why I thought I needed to use a new header file. As you point out, just needed to refactor the original header.

@mmartell
mmartell requested a review from pdxcodemonkey May 2, 2022 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.