Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Allow an argument to match a type formatter by its interface/base class/generic definition #644

Copy link
Copy link

Description

@delatrie
Issue body actions

The type formatters API allows users to provide their own serialization algorithms to format arguments of certain types. To do so, two things are required:

  1. Define a class that derives from Allure.Net.Commons.TypeFormatter<T>.
  2. Call Allure.Net.Commons.AllureLifecycle.AddTypeFormatter<T>(Allure.Net.Commons.TypeFormatter<T> formatter) early enough for the formatter to be picked up by Allure.

If everything is done right, Allure will use the formatter to convert arguments of the matched type to strings in two contexts:

  • when converting test method arguments to strings (usually, at test end)
  • when convertins arguments of attribute-based steps at step end

Limitations

If we'd like to format a value of type T, then:

  1. T must be known at compile time
  2. T must be accessible
  3. T must be the exact type of the value (i.e., value.GetType() == typeof(T) must be true)

This is cumbersome in the following situations:

  1. T is a private or internal type of a 3rd party library
  2. There are a lot of types we'd like to format similarly but have to call AddTypeFormater for each of them anyway.

Solution

A solution is to make the matching algorithm less restrictive. We can try to find a match in the following order:

  1. TypeFormatter<T>.
  2. TypeFormatter<G>, where G is a generic type definition of a (bound) generic type T.
  3. TypeFormatter<I>, where I is a type of an interface implemented by T.
  4. TypeFormatter<IG>, where IG is a generic type definition of an interface implemented by T.
  5. TypeFormatter<B>, where B is a base class of T.
  6. TypeFormatter<GB>, where GB is a generic type definition of the base class of T.

Options 2, 4, and 6 require a new AddTypeFormatter overload since these formatters can't be added with the existing one.

Options 5 and 6 apply repeatedly until we reach System.Object.

If the match result is found, we can cache it by adding the [value.GetType(), formatter] entry to the dictionary of formatters.

Reactions are currently unavailable

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.