Suggestion

Okay so random idea I had but basically:

Skript has a chunk of events that are built on top of normal bukkit events but with conditions (e.g. EvtPressurePlate or EvtFirstJoin)

which can cause some annoying but (I guess so far) resolvable issues

so my idea is allow us to have a check for event-values e.g.

eventValueRegistry.register(EventValue.builder(PlayerGameModeChangeEvent.class, GameMode.class)
			.getter(PlayerGameModeChangeEvent::getNewGameMode)
			.patterns("gamemode")
                        .check(PlayerGameModeChangeEvent::isCancelled)
			.build());

or a more advanced one

eventValueRegistry.register(EventValue.builder(PlayerGameModeChangeEvent.class, GameMode.class)
			.getter(PlayerGameModeChangeEvent::getNewGameMode)
			.patterns("gamemode")
                        .check(event -> {
                             if (conditions blah blah)
                                 return true;
                             return false;
                        })
			.build());

Basically it'd act like a check similiar to how events have check
e.g. lets say 2 events have same bukkit event (PlayerMoveEvent) but one wants event-item stack but one does not

currently that could work with a check in get/in a changer if x conditions meet then return nothing but that can be confusing for users so

instead if false is returned inside check then the event-value act like it does not exist on the event else if they do the event-value will work perfectly fine

Why?

Seems useful

Other

this possibly might already exist but I don't believe it does in the way I described only excludes

Agreement

• I have read the guidelines above and affirm I am following them with this suggestion.