Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

SegNet training data - Bounding boxes instead of segmentation masks? #26

Copy link
Copy link

Description

@JLC827
Issue body actions

Hi,

I'm interested in using the SIPEC pipeline to perform identification, counting, and behaviour identification for primates and other animals.

Would it be reasonable to use bounding boxes as pseudo segmentation masks for training the SegNet stage? I.e. treat the entire area enclosed by the bounding box as a mask.

The data I am working with will be in the bounding box format because it's quicker and easier to label up. And if I'm understanding the paper correctly the segmentation masks are used to just generate a bounding box for the later stages, so the precise segmentation is unimportant.

Please let me know if you can think of any issues that might arise with this approach. It would make things much simpler if this approach works, as otherwise I will have to consider an alternative object detector and have to slot that into the pipeline.

Thanks!

Reactions are currently unavailable

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.