Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Update release pipeline to use Approvals and automate some manual tasks#17837

Merged
adityapatwardhan merged 16 commits into
PowerShell:masterPowerShell/PowerShell:masterfrom
adityapatwardhan:ManualTasksadityapatwardhan/PowerShell:ManualTasksCopy head branch name to clipboard
Aug 8, 2022
Merged

Update release pipeline to use Approvals and automate some manual tasks#17837
adityapatwardhan merged 16 commits into
PowerShell:masterPowerShell/PowerShell:masterfrom
adityapatwardhan:ManualTasksadityapatwardhan/PowerShell:ManualTasksCopy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@adityapatwardhan

@adityapatwardhan adityapatwardhan commented Aug 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

PR Summary

  1. Update the task based on environment approval to use Manual tasks
  2. Automate kicking off builds for release automation, vpack and snap
  3. Automate adding change log to the GitHub release draft.

PR Context

PR Checklist

Comment thread tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/releasePipeline.yml Outdated

@JamesWTruher JamesWTruher left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mostly looks fine, but the wait cmdlet will emit progress

Comment thread tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/releasePipeline.yml
Set-AzDoProjectInfo -ProjectOwner PowerShell-Rel -ProjectName Release-Automation
$metadata = Get-Content -Raw -Path '$(Pipeline.Workspace)/releasePipeline/metadata/release.json' | ConvertFrom-Json
$azDOBuild = Get-AzDOBuild -buildDefinitionId 10 -MaximumResult 100 | Where-Object { $_.tags -contains $metadata.ReleaseVersion }
$azDoBuild | Remove-AzDOBuildTag -tag 'InProgress' -Pass | Add-AzDOBuildTag -Id $azDOBuild.Id -tag 'SignedOff'

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should there be a check for the job being complete?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waiting for completion in above task

Comment thread tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/releasePipeline.yml Outdated
@ghost ghost added the Waiting on Author The PR was reviewed and requires changes or comments from the author before being accept label Aug 8, 2022
@ghost ghost removed the Waiting on Author The PR was reviewed and requires changes or comments from the author before being accept label Aug 8, 2022
@adityapatwardhan adityapatwardhan marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2022 18:04
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 291 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Large
Size       : +240 -51
Percentile : 69.1%

Total files changed: 3

Change summary by file extension:
.yml : +240 -51

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@adityapatwardhan adityapatwardhan merged commit 2eed0f5 into PowerShell:master Aug 8, 2022
@adityapatwardhan adityapatwardhan deleted the ManualTasks branch August 8, 2022 18:56
@adityapatwardhan adityapatwardhan added the CL-BuildPackaging Indicates that a PR should be marked as a build or packaging change in the Change Log label Aug 8, 2022
@ghost

ghost commented Aug 11, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉v7.3.0-preview.7 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

@TravisEz13

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Shouldn't be a full backport, but only of the manual approval changes

@ghost

ghost commented Apr 13, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉v7.2.11 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Backport-7.2.x-Done CL-BuildPackaging Indicates that a PR should be marked as a build or packaging change in the Change Log Large

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.