Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Secure Source of Randomness#6

Open
pixeebot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterOptimuhs/pythonping:masterfrom
pixeebot/drip-2025-08-02-pixee-python/secure-randomOptimuhs/pythonping:pixeebot/drip-2025-08-02-pixee-python/secure-randomCopy head branch name to clipboard
Open

Secure Source of Randomness#6
pixeebot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterOptimuhs/pythonping:masterfrom
pixeebot/drip-2025-08-02-pixee-python/secure-randomOptimuhs/pythonping:pixeebot/drip-2025-08-02-pixee-python/secure-randomCopy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@pixeebot

@pixeebot pixeebot Bot commented Aug 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This codemod replaces all instances of functions in the random module (e.g. random.random() with their, much more secure, equivalents from the secrets module (e.g. secrets.SystemRandom().random()).

There is significant algorithmic complexity in getting computers to generate genuinely unguessable random bits. The random.random() function uses a method of pseudo-random number generation that unfortunately emits fairly predictable numbers.

If the numbers it emits are predictable, then it's obviously not safe to use in cryptographic operations, file name creation, token construction, password generation, and anything else that's related to security. In fact, it may affect security even if it's not directly obvious.

Switching to a more secure version is simple and the changes look something like this:

- import random
+ import secrets
  ...
- random.random()
+ secrets.SystemRandom().random()
More reading

🧚🤖 Powered by Pixeebot

Feedback | Community | Docs | Codemod ID: pixee:python/secure-random

@pixeebot

pixeebot Bot commented Aug 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I'm confident in this change, but I'm not a maintainer of this project. Do you see any reason not to merge it?

If this change was not helpful, or you have suggestions for improvements, please let me know!

@pixeebot

pixeebot Bot commented Aug 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Just a friendly ping to remind you about this change. If there are concerns about it, we'd love to hear about them!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.