That crappy micro-ATX build posted, with the Rosewill case and IED PSU. It sucks hard. Also, huge by comparison. Which is why the DIY build should be as close as possible in footprint for a worthwhile comparison.
I was just thinking along those lines. PC builders are pointing out they can do better bang/buck building themselves, using the
cheapest support part in every list.
But what experienced PC builder just uses the cheapest everything? Even on a budget build?
The first thing I do is get a nice PSU that will handle any upgrade I might consider in the future. My i5-12400/RTX 4070 is running on an overkill Corsair RM850x PSU. I don't think I can even make it spin it's cooling fan. Cash was/is tight for me, but I'm never going to buy a sketchy PSU to save a buck. I'll delay a build before I do that.
For motherboards, I have a minimum I/O feature set in mind, and I want to see it reviewed to make sure VRMs can easily handle more power hungry CPU upgrade. Never in my life did I just buy the cheapest MB available. Every MB I used was researched.
If I wanted to actually build a
nice SFF PC of equivalent performance, it would probably cost me $900 USD+. Naturally I would spend even more to upgrade to a 16GB 9060 at that point, so I really wouldn't build the equivalent. But the point remains, I'm not going to use the bottom of every list, and few builders would.
I think even around $700 they will have plenty of takers because its a VERY nice MiniPC.
Just like Valve, we can't predict what will be happening to RAM/Storage pricing and tariffs closer to shipping, but every product will face those pressures.
So lets just pretend it were dropping today for $700. Many will grumble it's too expensive because they could bargain bin dive and build cheaper, but many others will buy it because it's VERY nice product.
Valve is not really trying to kill consoles, there are under ZERO pressure to sell 50 million Steam Machines. Valve has a near monopoly on PC gaming.
Valve is NOT a public company, they don't have to worry about short term anything. Valve is playing the
Long Game. They just want to keep growing SteamOS as an alternative to whatever nonsense MS is doing with Windows.
What were a few million Steam Decks against the Billion Steam users? Statistical noise.
But they were enough to encourage others into the space. That's all they really need from Steam Machine a little nudge to get more competing Steam Machines built, and arguably it's even easier because it can be 100% off the shelf components, so another little nudge for SteamOS.