Abstract
Bats appear in the fossil record on multiple continents during the early Eocene. More than seventy Eocene bat species have been named to date, including stem bats, probable members of crown families, and others of uncertain affinity. Most phylogenetic analyses of Eocene bat relationships have focused on the handful of taxa known from nearly complete skeletal material, whereas the taxonomic relationships of more incomplete fossils have been based largely on phenetic similarities. Here we evaluate the evolutionary relationships of over 60 species of Eocene bats—including many taxa known only from fragmentary craniodental remains—in an explicitly phylogenetic context. Our analysis is based on nearly 700 morphological characters scored in 82 taxa, including 20 extant species representing all living bat families other than Pteropodidae. We found that phylogenetic relationships of Eocene bats are more complex than previously thought. Numerous families (e.g., †Archaeonycteridae, †Mixopterygidae, †Palaeochiropterygidae) and genera (e.g., †Archaeonycteris, †Icaronycteris, †Carcinipteryx) were found to be non-monophyletic as previously recognized, requiring adjustments to chiropteran taxonomy. Four major clades of stem bats were recovered in our analyses. †Microchiropteryx folieae (~ 54 Ma, India) was recovered as the earliest crown bat, occurring as the most basal lineage of Vespertilionoidea, whereas many putative crown bats were recovered among stem Chiroptera. †Tachypteron franzeni was found to be a crown bat in our analyses, as in previous studies, but it was recovered unexpectedly as a stem miniopterid. The phylogenetic relationships presented here represent the most comprehensive analysis of Eocene bat relationships completed to date, substantially improving our understanding of the position of many fossil taxa within Chiroptera and providing a foundation for future analyses of bat evolution.





Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed in this study are available on the MorphoBank repository, Project 4619: http://morphobank.org/permalink/?P4619.
References
Amador LI, Arévalo RLM, Almeida FC, Catalano SA, Giannini NP (2018) Bat systematics in the light of unconstrained analyses of a comprehensive molecular supermatrix. J Mammal Evol 25(1):37–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-016-9363-8
Asher RJ, Bennett N, Lehmann T (2009) The new framework for understanding placental mammal evolution. BioEssays 31:853–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.200900053
Beard KC, Sigé B, Krishtalka L (1992) A primitive vespertilionoid bat from the early Eocene of central Wyoming. CR Acad Sci, Ser II 314(7):735–741.
Brown EE, Cashmore DD, Simmons NB, Butler RJ (2019) Quantifying the completeness of the bat fossil record. Palaeontology 62(5):757–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12426
Carlisle E, Janis CM, Pisani D, Donoghue PCJ, Silvestro D (2023) A timescale for placental mammal diversification based on Bayesian modeling of the fossil record. Curr Biol 33:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.016
Clementz M, Bajpai S, Ravikant V, Thewissen JGM, Saravanan N, Singh IB, Prasad V (2010) Early Eocene warming events and the timing of terrestrial faunal exchange between India and Asia. Geology 39(1):15–18. https://doi.org/10.1130/G31585.1
Czaplewski NJ, Baker CG (2022) Carnassiform notches improve the functional efficiency of bat molar shearing crests. Acta Palaeontol Pol 67(1):257–282. https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00889.2021
Czaplewski NJ, Morgan GS, Emry RJ, Gignac PM, O’Brien HD (2022) Three new early middle Eocene bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Elderberry Canyon, Nevada, USA. Smithson Contrib Paleobiol 106:1–26.
Czaplewski NJ, Morgan GS, McLeod SA (2007) Chiroptera. In: Janis CM, Gunnell GF, Uhen MD (eds) Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 174–197.
Czaplewski NJ, Person J, Boyd C, Emry RJ (2019) A new species of bat (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from the early Oligocene global cooling period, Brule Formation, North Dakota, USA. Palaeovertebrata 42(2):e2. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.42.2.e2
Dávalos LM, Velazco PM, Warsi OM, Smits PD, Simmons NB (2014) Integrating incomplete fossils by isolating conflicting signal in saturated and non-independent morphological characters. Syst Biol 63(4):582–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu022
Eick GN, Jacobs DS, Matthee CA (2005) A nuclear DNA phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of echolocation and historical biogeography of extant bats (Chiroptera). Mol Biol Evol 22(9):1869–1886. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi180
Eiting TP, Gunnell GF (2009) Global completeness of the bat fossil record. J Mammal Evol 16(3):151–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-009-9118-x
Esselstyn JA, Oliveros CH, Swanson MT, Faircloth BC (2017) Investigating difficult nodes in the placental mammal tree with expanded taxon sampling and thousands of ultraconserved elements. Genome Biol Evol 9:2308–2321. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evx168
Foley NM, Mason VC, Harris AJ, Bredemeyer KR, Damas J, Lewin HA, Eizirik E, Gatesy J, Karlsson EK, Lindblad-Toh K, Zoonomia_Consortium, Springer MS, Murphy WJ (2023) A genomic timescale for placental mammal evolution. Science 380:eabl8189. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl8189
Godthelp H, Archer M, Cifelli R, Hand SJ, Gilkeson CF (1992) Earliest known Australian Tertiary mammal fauna. Nature 356:514–516.
Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon KC (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24:774–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x
Gunnell GF, Jacobs BF, Herendeen PS, Head JJ, Kowalski E, Msuya CP, Mizambwa FA, Harrison T, Habersetzer J, Storch G (2003) Oldest placental mammal from sub-Saharan Africa: Eocene microbat from Tanzania – evidence for early evolution of sophisticated echolocation. Palaeontol Electron 5:1–10.
Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (2005) Fossil evidence and the origin of bats. J Mammal Evol 12(1–2):209–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-005-6945-2
Gunnell GF, Simmons NB, Seiffert ER (2014) New Myzopodidae (Chiroptera) from the Late Paleogene of Egypt: emended family diagnosis and biogeographic origins of Noctilionoidea. PLoS One 9(2):e86712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086712
Gunnell GF, Simons EL, Seiffert ER (2008) New bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from the late Eocene and early Oligocene, Fayum Depression, Egypt. J Vertebr Paleontol 28(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[1:nbmcft]2.0.co;2
Habersetzer J, Storch G (1987) Klassifikation und funktionelle Flügelmorphologie paläogener Fledermäuse (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Cour Forsch-Inst Senckenberg 91:117–150.
Hand SJ (1985) New Miocene megadermatids (Chiroptera: Megadermatidae) from Australia with comments on megadermatid phylogenetics. Aust Mammal 8(1–2):5–43.
Hand SJ, Beck RM, Archer M, Simmons NB, Gunnell GF, Scofield RP, Tennyson AJ, De Pietri VL, Salisbury SW, Worthy TH (2018) A new, large-bodied omnivorous bat (Noctilionoidea: Mystacinidae) reveals lost morphological and ecological diversity since the Miocene in New Zealand. Sci Rep 8(1):235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18403-w
Hand SJ, Maugoust J, Beck RMD, Orliac MJ (2023) A 50-million-year-old, three-dimensionally preserved bat skull supports an early origin for modern echolocation. Curr Biol 33:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.09.043
Hand S, Novacek M, Godthelp H, Archer M (1994) First Eocene bat from Australia. J Vertebr Paleontol 14(3):375–381.
Hand SJ, Sigé B (2018) A new archaic bat (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae) from an Early Eocene forest in the Paris Basin. Hist Biol 30(1–2):227–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2017.1297435
Hand SJ, Sigé B, Archer M, Black KH (2016) An evening bat (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from the late early Eocene of France, with comments on the antiquity of modern bats. Palaeovertebrata 40(2):e2. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.40.2.e2
Hand SJ, Sigé B, Archer M, Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (2015) A new early Eocene (Ypresian) bat from Pourcy, Paris Basin, France, with comments on patterns of diversity in the earliest chiropterans. J Mammal Evol 22(3):343–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-015-9286-9
Hand S, Sigé B, Maitre E (2012) Necromantis Weithofer, 1887, large carnivorous Middle and Late Eocene bats from the French Quercy Phosphorites: new data and unresolved relationships. In: Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (eds) Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils, Molecules, and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 210–251.
Hao X, Lu Q, Zhao H (2023) A molecular phylogeny for all 21 families within Chiroptera (bats). Integr Zool 0:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12772
Harrison DL, Hooker JJ (2010) Late middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae). Acta Chiropt 12(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3161/150811010x504554
Hermsen EJ, Hendricks JR (2008) W(h)ither fossils? Studying morphological character evolution in the age of molecular sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 95(1):72–100. https://doi.org/10.3417/2006206
Horáček I, Špoutil F (2012) Why tribosphenic? On variation and constraint in developmental dynamics of chiropteran molars. In: Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (eds) Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils, Molecules and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 410–455.
Jebb D, Huang Z, Pippel M, Hughes GM, Lavrichenko K, Devanna P, Winkler S, Jermiin LS, Skirmuntt EC, Katzourakis A, Burkitt-Gray L, Ray DA, Sullivan KAM, Roscito JG, Kirilenko BM, Dávalos LM, Corthals AP, Power ML, Jones G, Ransome RD, Dechmann DKN, Locatelli AG, Puechmaille SJ, Fedrigo O, Jarvis ED, Hiller M, Vernes SC, Myers EW, Teeling EC (2020) Six reference-quality genomes reveal evolution of bat adaptations. Nature 583:578–584. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2486-3
Jepsen GL (1966) Early Eocene bat from Wyoming. Science 154:1333–1339.
Jones MF, Coster PM, Licht A, Métais G, Ocakoğlu F, Taylor MH, Beard KC (2019) A stem bat (Chiroptera: Palaeochiropterygidae) from the late middle Eocene of northern Anatolia: implications for the dispersal and palaeobiology of early bats. Palaeobiodivers Palaeoenviron 99:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12549-018-0338-z
Jones MF, Li Q, Ni X, Beard KC (2021) The earliest Asian bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) address major gaps in bat evolution. Biol Lett 17:20210185. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2021.0185
Legendre S, Sigé B (1982) La place du “Vespertilion de Montmartre” dans l’histoire des chiroptères molossidés. Actes Symp Paléontol Georges Cuvier:347–361.
Lenz OK, Wilde V, Mertz DF, Riegel W (2015) New palynology-based astronomical and revised 40AR/39AR ages for the Eocene maar lake of Messel (Germany). Int J Earth Sci 104:873–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-014-1126-2
Maitre E (2014) Western European middle Eocene to early Oligocene Chiroptera: systematics, phylogeny and palaeoecology based on new material from the Quercy (France). Swiss J Palaeontol 133(2):141–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-014-0069-3
Maitre E, Sigé B, Escarguel G (2008) A new family of bats in the Paleogene of Europe: Systematics and implications for the origin of emballonurids and rhinolophoids. Neues Jahrb Geol Paläontol Abh 250(2):199–216. https://doi.org/10.1127/0077-7749/2008/0250-0199
Marandat B, Crochet J-Y, Godinot M, Hartenberger J-L, Legendre S, Remy JA, Sigé B, Sudre J, Vianey-Liaud M (1993) Une nouvelle faune a mammiferes d’age eocene moyen (Lutetien Superieur) dans les phosphorites du Quercy. Geobios 26(5):617–623.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6995(93)80042-P
McKenna MC, Bell SK (1997) Classification of mammals: above the species level. Columbia University Press, New York.
Meredith RW, Janečka JE, Gatesy J, Ryder OA, Fisher CA, Teeling EC, Goodbla A, Eizirik E, Simão TLL, Stadler T, Rabosky DL, Honeycutt RL, Flynn JJ, Ingram CM, Steiner C, Williams TL, Robinson TJ, Burk-Herrick A, Westerman M, Ayoub NA, Springer MS, Murphy WJ (2011) Impacts of the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334:521–524. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211028
Miller-Butterworth CM, Murphy WJ, O’Brien SJ, Jacobs DS, Springer MS, Teeling EC (2007) A family matter: conclusive resolution of the taxonomic position of the long-fingered bats, Miniopterus. Mol Biol Evol 24(7):1553–1561. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm076
Morgan GS, Czaplewski NJ (2003) A new bat (Chiroptera: Natalidae) from the Early Miocene of Florida, with comments on Natalid phylogeny. J Mammal 84(2):729–752.
Novacek MJ (1985) Evidence for echolocation in the oldest known bats. Nature 315:140–141.
O’Leary MA, Bloch JI, Flynn JJ, Gaudin TJ, Giallombardo A, Giannini NP, Goldberg SL, Kraatz BP, Luo Z-X, Meng J, Ni X, Novacek MJ, Perini FA, Randall ZS, Rougier GW, Sargis EJ, Silcox MT, Simmons NB, Spaulding M, Velazco PM, Weksler M, Wible JR, Cirranello AL (2013) The placental mammal ancestor and the post K-Pg radiation of placentals. Science 339:662–667. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1229237
Ostrander GE (1983) New early Oligocene (Chadronian) mammals from the Raben Ranch Local Fauna, northwest Nebraska. J Paleontol 57(1):128–139.
Ostrander GE (1985) Correlation of the early Oligocene (Chadronian) in northwestern Nebraska. Dakoterra 2(2):205–231.
Ostrander GE (1987) The early Oligocene (Chadronian) Raben Ranch local fauna, northwest Nebraska: Marsupialia, Insectivora, Dermoptera, Chiroptera, and Primates. Dakoterra 3:92–104.
Ravel A, Adaci M, Bensalah M, Charruault A-L, Essid EM, Ammar HK, Marzougui W, Mahboubi M, Mebrouk F, Merzeraud G (2016) Origin and radiation of modern bats: new discoveries in the Eocene of North Africa. Geodiversitas 38(3):355–434. https://doi.org/10.5252/g2016n3a3
Ravel A, Adaci M, Bensalah M, Mahboubi M, Mebrouk F, Essid EM, Marzougui W, Ammar HK, Charruault A-L, Lebrun R, Tabuce R, Vianey-Liaud M, Marivaux L (2015) New philisids (Mammalia, Chiroptera) from the Early–Middle Eocene of Algeria and Tunisia: new insight into the phylogeny, palaeobiogeography and palaeoecology of the Philisidae. J Syst Palaeontol 13(8):691–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2014.941422
Ravel A, Marivaux L, Qi T, Wang Y-Q, Beard KC (2014) New chiropterans from the middle Eocene of Shanghuang (Jiangsu Province, Coastal China): new insight into the dawn horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae) in Asia. Zool Scr 43(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12027
Ravel A, Marivaux L, Tabuce R, Adaci M, Mahboubi M, Mebrouk F, Bensalah M (2011) The oldest African bat from the early Eocene of El Kohol (Algeria). Naturwissenschaften 98(5):397–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0785-0
Ravel A, Marivaux L, Tabuce R, Ben Haj Ali M, Essid EM, Vianey-Liaud M (2012) A new large philisid (Mammalia, Chiroptera, Vespertilionoidea) from the late Early Eocene of Chambi, Tunisia. Palaeontology 55(5):1035–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01160.x
Revilliod P (1920) Contribution à l’étude des chiroptères des terrains tertiaires. Deuxième partie. Mém Soc Paléontol Suisse 44:63–129.
Rietbergen TB, van den Hoek Ostende LW, Aase A, Jones MF, Medeiros ED, Simmons NB (2023) The oldest known bat skeletons and their implications for Eocene chiropteran diversification. PLoS One 18(4):e0283505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283505
Russell DE, Louis P, Savage DE (1973) Chiroptera and Dermoptera of the French early Eocene. Univ Calif Publ Geol Sci 95:1–55.
Seiffert ER (2006) Revised age estimates for the later Paleogene mammal faunas of Egypt and Oman. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(13):5000–5005. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600689103
Sigé B (1974) Données nouvelles sur le genre Stehlinia (Vespertilionoidea, Chiroptera) du Paléogène d’Europe. Palaeovertebrata 6:253–272.
Sigé B (1985) Les chiroptères oligocènes du Fayum, Egypte. Geol Palaeontol 19:161–189.
Sigé B (1991) Rhinolophoidea et Vespertilionoidea (Chiroptera) du Chambi (Eocene inferieur de Tunisie) Aspects biostratigraphique, biogeographique et paleoecologique de l’origine des chiropteres modernes. Neues Jahrb Geol Paläontol Abh 182(3):355–376.
Sigé B (1997) Les remplissages karstiques polyphasés (Eocène, Oligocène, Pliocène) de St-Maximin (Phospohorites du Gard) et leur apport à la connaissance des faunes européenes, notamment pour l’Eocène moyen (MP 13). 3 – Systématique: Euthériens entomophage. In: Aguilar J-P, Legendre S, Michaux J (eds) Actes du Congrès Biochrom ‘97, Montpellier 14–17 avril: biochronologie mammalienne du cénozoïque en Europe et domaines reliés. Institut Montpellier, Montpellier, pp 737–750.
Sigé B (2011) Cryptobune nov. gen., chiroptère carnivore des phosphorites du Quercy, SW France. Bull Soc Hist Nat Toulouse 147:47–54.
Sigé B, Maitre E, Hand S (2012) Necromantodonty, the primitive condition of lower molars among bats. In: Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (eds) Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils, Molecules and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 456–469.
Sigé B, Thomas H, Sen S, Gheerbrant E, Roger J, Al-Sulaimani Z (1994) Les chiroptères de Taqah (Oligocène inférieur, Sultanat d’Oman). Premier inventaire systématique. Münchner Geowiss Abh 26:35–48.
Simmons NB, Cirranello AL (2023) Bat Species of the World: A taxonomic and geographic database https://batnames.org.Accessed3/17/23
Simmons NB, Geisler JH (1998) Phylogenetic relationships of Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx to extant bat lineages. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 235(1):1-182.
Simmons NB, Seiffert ER, Gunnell GF (2016) A new family of large omnivorous bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera) from the late Eocene of the Fayum Depression, Egypt, with comments on use of the name “Eochiroptera”. Am Mus Novit 3857:1–43. https://doi.org/10.1206/3857.1
Simmons NB, Seymour KL, Habersetzer J, Gunnell GF (2008) Primitive Early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation. Nature 451(7180):818–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06549
Slaughter BH (1970) Evolutionary trends of chiropteran dentitions. In: Slaughter BH, Walton DW (eds) About Bats: A Chiropteran Biology Symposium. Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas, pp 51–83.
Smith T, Habersetzer J, Simmons NB, Gunnell GF (2012) Systematics and paleobiogeography of early bats. In: Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (eds) Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils Molecules and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 23–66.
Smith T, Rana RS, Missiaen P, Rose KD, Sahni A, Singh H, Singh L (2007) High bat (Chiroptera) diversity in the Early Eocene of India. Naturwissenschaften 94(12):1003–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0280-9
Smith R, Russell DE (1992) Mammifères (Marsupialia, Chiroptera) de l’Yprésien de la Belgique. Bull Inst R Sci Natl Belg, Sciences de la Terre 62:223–227.
Speijer RP, Pälike H, Hollis CJ, Hooker JJ, Ogg JG (2020) The Paleogene Period. In: Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Schmitz MD, Ogg GM (eds) Geologic Time Scale 2020. 2. Elsevier, 1087–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-1-02369-3
Springer MS, Stanhope MJ, Madsen O, de Jong WW (2004) Molecules consolidate the placental mammal tree. Trends Ecol Evol 19(8):430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.05.006
Storch G, Sige B, Habersetzer J (2002) Tachypteron franzeni n. gen., n. sp., earliest emballonurid bat from the Middle Eocene of Messel (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Palaontol Z 76(2):189–199.
Tabuce R, Antunes MT, Sigé B (2009) A new primitive bat from the earliest Eocene of Europe. J Vertebr Paleontol 29(2):627–630. https://doi.org/10.1671/039.029.0204
Teeling EC, Dool S, Springer MS (2012) Phylogenies, fossils and functional genes: the evolution of echolocation in bats. In: Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (eds) Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils, Molecules and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–22.
Teeling EC, Madsen O, Van den Bussche RA, de Jong WW, Stanhope MJ, Springer MS (2002) Microbat paraphyly and the convergent evolution of a key innovation in Old World rhinolophoid microbats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(3):1431–1436. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.022477199
Teeling EC, Springer MS, Madsen O, Bates P, O’Brien S J, Murphy WJ (2005) A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307(5709):580–584. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1105113
Tejedor MF, Czaplewski NJ, Goin FJ, Aragon E (2005) The oldest record of South American bats. J Vertebr Paleontol 25(4):990–993. https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634%282005%29025%5B0990%3ATOROSA
Tong Y (1997) Middle Eocene small mammals from Liguanqiao Basin of Henan province and Yuanqu Basin of Shanxi province, central China. Palaeontol Sin 18:1–256.
Van Valen LM (1979) The evolution of bats. Evol Theory 4:103–121.
Velazco PM, Buczek AJ, Hoffman E, Hoffman DK, O’Leary MA, Novacek MJ (2022) Combined data analysis of fossil and living mammals: a Paleogene sister taxon of Placentalia and the antiquity of Marsupialia. Cladistics 38(3):359–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12499
Acknowledgements
We thank Megan Sims (KU Vertebrate Paleontology), Maria Eifler (KU Mammalogy), Amy Henrici (Carnegie Museum of Natural History), Marisa Surovy, Eleanor Hoeger, Sara Ketelsen, Neil Duncan, Judy Galkin, and Alana Gishlick (American Museum of Natural History) for access to specimens and casts used in this study. We thank Justin Baez, Nate Upham, Tim Rietbergen, Edward Medieros, Paúl Velazco, Nick Czaplewski, Suzanne Hand, Thierry Smith, Paulyn Cartwright, Xijun Ni, Rafe Brown, and Paul Selden for helpful discussions and advice regarding this project and bat morphology. We thank Robin Beck and two anonymous reviewers for comments that have greatly improved the manuscript. This work was funded in part by a Society of Systematic Biologists Mini-ARTS Grant to MFJ, University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute Panorama Grant to MFJ, and by the David B. Jones Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.F.J., K.C.B., and N.B.S. conceptualized the project. M.F.J. and N.B.S. designed the methodology. M.F.J. conducted analyses with input from K.C.B. and N.B.S. M.F.J. prepared the original draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript, and approved the final version for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Synapomorphies of major clades (see Online Resource 1: Table S3 for list of synapomorphies for all clades). See Fig. 6 for numbering of nodes. Additionally, note that MorphoBank characters begin with Character 1, whereas TNT characters begin with Character 0. The characters listed below are numbered following MorphoBank formatting and therefore begin with Character 1. If comparing the characters below to the TNT script (Online Resource 2P), subtract 1 from the character number.
Nodes referenced in Appendix 1
Node 1 – Clade A
- 24:
-
upper canine with raised anteromedial cingulum, but no cusp
- 39:
-
more recurved upper canine
- 47:
-
P3 absent
- 220:
-
Lower molars with lingual cusps < 75% height of labial cusps
Node 7 – Necromantidae
- 24:
-
upper canine with low anteromedial accessory cusp
- 25:
-
upper canine with anteromedial groove
- 29:
-
lingual cingulum of upper canine not steeply sloped
- 32:
-
upper canine with large distal cingulum
- 136:
-
M3 with long parastyle
- 245:
-
m1 entoconid weakly developed and low
- 263:
-
m2 entoconid weakly developed and low
Node 9 – Khonsunycteris and Witwatia (?Philisidae)
- 166:
-
lower canine without posterobasal cusp
- 216:
-
myotodont lower molars
- 234:
-
m1-2 with large hypoconulid
Node 14 – Clade B
- 103:
-
M1 preparacrista shorter than postparacrista
- 119:
-
M2 with single ectoflexus between parastyle and mesostyle region
- 168:
-
lower canine without labial cingulum
- 263:
-
m2 entoconid weak and low
Node 20 – Clade C
- 72:
-
upper molar ectocingula present but weak
- 174:
-
p2 shorter than p3
- 181:
-
p3 with anterolingual cuspule
- 206:
-
p4 with short postmetacristid
- 396:
-
one to two vertebrae articulate with ilium
- 398:
-
at least some sacral or caudal vertebrae in contact ischium by suture or fusion
- 450:
-
scapula with thick lip on axillary border
- 460:
-
scapula with crest near caudal border
- 468:
-
coracoclavicular joint absent
- 470:
-
humerofemoral index greater than 150
- 479:
-
small deltoid tubercle on humerus
- 563:
-
metacarpal II shorter than metacarpal IV
- 584:
-
digit II of wing proximal and intermediate phalanges length subequal
Node 21 – Archaeonycteridae s.l.
- 195:
-
p4 without lingual cingulid
- 210:
-
p4 tribosphenic, with distinct trigonid and talonid
- 253:
-
m1 with deep hypoflexid
- 255:
-
m2-3 paraconid slightly shorter than metaconid
- 275:
-
m3 with deep hypoflexid
Node 26 – Philisidae s.s.
- 82:
-
M1-2 angle between postparacrista and premetacrista 20 degrees or less
- 83:
-
M1-2 postparacrista does not contact premetacrista, trigon open
- 106:
-
M1 postprotocrista oriented toward a point between metacone and hypocone regions
- 119:
-
M2 with single ectoflexus between parastyle and mesostyle regions
- 253:
-
m1 with deep hypoflexid
Node 27 – Clade D
- 72:
-
upper molars with strong ectocingula
Node 29 – Hassianycteridae s.s.
- 187:
-
p3 height slightly shorter than p4 height
- 203:
-
p4 without metaconid
- 270:
-
m3 labial cingulid weakly developed
Node 30 – Clade E
- 188:
-
p3-4 subequal in length
- 261:
-
m2 labial cingulid weakly developed
- 270:
-
m3 labial cingulid weakly developed
Node 33 – Onychonycteridae s.l.
- 224:
-
lower molar cristids obliqua oriented toward protoconid
- 276:
-
m3 entocristid parallel to long axis of the tooth
Node 40 – Icaronycteridae s.l.
- 111:
-
M1 hypocone shelf small
- 113:
-
M1 hypocone incipient or poorly developed
- 181:
-
p3 anterolingual cuspule present
- 193:
-
p4 paraconid large and high
- 246:
-
m1 labial cingulid strongly developed
Node 42 – Icaronycteridae s.s.
- 138:
-
M3 paraconule present
- 139:
-
M3 postmetacrista present
- 140:
-
M3 premetacrista and postparacrista lengths subequal
Node 43 – crown bats
- 12:
-
I1 separated from i1 by large gap when cheek teeth are in occlusion
- 22:
-
upper canine anteroposteriorly elongated
- 85:
-
M1-2 mesostyle formed at contact between postparacrista and premetacrista
- 117:
-
M2 parastyle short
- 118:
-
M2 parastyle straight
- 136:
-
M3 parastyle short
- 194:
-
p4 paracristid absent
- 220:
-
lower molar lingual cusps less than 75% height of labial cusps
- 379:
-
posterior spinous process of thoracic vertebrae absent
- 386:
-
transverse processes of lumbar vertebrae caudotransversely oriented
- 434:
-
xiphoid process longer than longest sternebra
- 459:
-
scapula with convex cranial margin
- 477:
-
humerus with convex posterior edge
- 505:
-
distal styloid process of humerus well developed
- 518:
-
anconeal process of ulna further cranial than coronoid process
- 539:
-
scaphoid facet for trapezium grooved
- 600:
-
total craniocaudal length of pubis between 1.0-1.5x length of acetabulum
- 604:
-
lunate surface of acetabulum inverted U-shaped
- 606:
-
ischiatic spine absent
- 616:
-
greater trochanter of femur markedly shorter than femoral head
- 640:
-
incomplete fibula
- 695:
-
proximal phalanx of digit I of pes longer than that of digit III
Node 44 – Rhinolophoidea
- 24:
-
upper canine with low anteromedial accessory cusp
- 35:
-
upper canine with tall, conspicuous posterolateral accessory cusp that is less than ½ height of main cusp
- 47:
-
P3 absent
- 84:
-
M1-2 with narrow and deep trigon
- 112:
-
M1 hypocone shelf wider than trigon basin
- 159:
-
lower incisors not procumbent
- 175:
-
p3 absent
- 242:
-
m1 metacristid present
- 253:
-
m1 hypoflexid deep
- 265:
-
m2 hypoflexid deep
- 362:
-
cervical vertebrae C4-6 with concave posterior edge of lamina
- 367:
-
cervical vertebra C7 spinous process projects dorsally
- 387:
-
anterior transverse processes of lumbar vertebrae vertically directed
- 547:
-
trapezium smaller than trapezoid
- 686:
-
foot length 33-50% tibia length
Node 49 – Megadermatidae (Megaderma + Saharaderma)
- 193:
-
p4 paraconid absent
- 195:
-
p4 with complete lingual cingulid
- 208:
-
p4 protoconid more robust, shorter, more blunt
- 236:
-
m1 shorter than m2
- 245:
-
m1 entoconid weakly developed and low
- 252:
-
m1 talonid and trigonid subequal
- 263:
-
m2 entoconid weakly developed and low
Node 50 – Yangochiroptera
- 140:
-
M3 premetacrista subequal in length or longer than postparacrista
- 260:
-
m2 protoconid slightly higher than hypoconid
- 304:
-
medial edge of premaxilla nasal process medially twisted
- 366:
-
cervical vertebra C7 spinous process absent
- 395:
-
sacroiliac articulation fused
- 445:
-
wide infraspinous fossa of scapula
- 534:
-
sesamoid element present dorsal to trapezium–metacarpal I articulation
- 540:
-
joint for scaphoid on trapezium vertical wedge-shaped
- 577:
-
second phalanx of manus digit II unossified or absent
- 599:
-
anterior edge of pubic symphysis broad U-shaped in ventral view
- 617:
-
anteroposterior depth of greater trochanter of femur greater than transverse width
- 621:
-
third trochanter of femur less than 10% maximum length of the femur
- 681:
-
calcar present
Node 51 – Vespertilionoidea s.l.
- 235:
-
entocristid of m1-2 high crest
- 276:
-
m3 entocristid parallel to long axis of tooth
Node 53 – Myzopodidae (Myzopoda + Phasmatonycteris)
- 176:
-
single rooted p3
- 187:
-
p3 height much shorter than p4 height
- 188:
-
p3 less than or equal to ½ length of p4
- 189:
-
p3 and p4 with different crown morphologies
- 210:
-
p4 without distinct cusps
- 222:
-
lower molars with strongly developed notches in paracristid and protocristid
- 228:
-
lower molar entocristids short or disrupted so talonids drain lingually
- 250:
-
m1 paraconid situated labial to a line drawn through the metaconid and entoconid
Node 55 – Vespertilionoidea s.s.
- 123:
-
M2 postmetacrista much longer than premetacrista but not 2x length
- 166:
-
lower canine without posterobuccal cusp
- 188:
-
p3-4 subequal in length
- 274:
-
m3 protoconid slightly higher than hypoconid
- 499:
-
trochlea of humerus position midline with respect to shaft axis
- 500:
-
trochlea width intermediate with respect to condyle width
Node 58 – Molossidae (Tadarida + Cuvierimops)
- 30:
-
upper canine with well-developed, complete labial cingulum
- 61:
-
P4 lingual cingular cusp well developed
- 98:
-
M1 parastyle straight
- 113:
-
M1 hypocone well developed
- 130:
-
M2 hypocone well developed
- 136:
-
M3 parastyle long
- 166:
-
lower canine posterobasal cusp weakly developed
- 203:
-
p4 with single metaconid
Node 60 – Miniopteridae s.l. (Miniopterus + Tachypteron)
- 80:
-
M1-2 protocone more sharp and more anteriorly inclined
- 84:
-
M1-2 trigon narrow and deep
- 104:
-
M1 postmetacrista length subequal to premetacrista length
- 168:
-
M1 postmetacrista length subequal to premetacrista length
- 216:
-
lower molars nyctalodont
- 252:
-
m1 talonid and trigonid subequal in width
- 385:
-
five lumbar vertebrae present
- 563:
-
metacarpal II longer than metacarpal IV
Node 62 – Cistugidae s.l. (Cistugo + Chadronycteris)
- 62:
-
P4 labial cingulum weakly developed
- 67:
-
P4 with one distal accessory cusp
- 109:
-
M1 endoloph absent
- 117:
-
M2 with long parastyle
- 141:
-
M3 metacone indistinct, incorporated into premetacrista
Node 64 – Noctilionoidea
- 12:
-
Upper and lower first incisors in contact or separated by small gap when cheek teeth in occlusion
- 104:
-
M1 postmetacrista subequal in length to premetacrista
- 124:
-
M2 postprotocrista oriented toward midpoint between metacone and hypocone regions
- 216:
-
lower molars myotodont
- 506:
-
distal styloid process of humerus medially positioned in epitrochlea
Node 69 – Emballonuroidea s.l.
- 38:
-
posterolabial surface of upper canine rounded
- 67:
-
P4 with one distal accessory cusp
- 100:
-
M1 with single, deep ectoflexus
- 125:
-
M2 endoloph present, approaches postprotocrista at angle
- 196:
-
p4 labial cingulid weakly developed
- 218:
-
lower molar talonid basins shallow
- 272:
-
m3 cristid obliqua present but does not reach trigonid
Node 73 – Emballonuroidea s.s. (Nycteris + Saccopteryx)
- 38:
-
posterolabial surface of upper canine flattened
- 109:
-
M1 endoloph present and continuous with postprotocrista
- 156:
-
i3 present
- 165:
-
lower canine with broad posterior cingulid
- 224:
-
lower molars cristid obliqua oriented toward metaconid
- 242:
-
m1 metacristid present
- 253:
-
m1 hypoflexid deep
- 265:
-
m2 hypoflexid deep
- 275:
-
m3 hypoflexid deep
- 279:
-
m3 hypoconulid absent
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, M.F., Beard, K.C. & Simmons, N.B. Phylogeny and systematics of early Paleogene bats. J Mammal Evol 31, 18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-024-09705-8
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-024-09705-8


