Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogeny and systematics of early Paleogene bats

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Mammalian Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bats appear in the fossil record on multiple continents during the early Eocene. More than seventy Eocene bat species have been named to date, including stem bats, probable members of crown families, and others of uncertain affinity. Most phylogenetic analyses of Eocene bat relationships have focused on the handful of taxa known from nearly complete skeletal material, whereas the taxonomic relationships of more incomplete fossils have been based largely on phenetic similarities. Here we evaluate the evolutionary relationships of over 60 species of Eocene bats—including many taxa known only from fragmentary craniodental remains—in an explicitly phylogenetic context. Our analysis is based on nearly 700 morphological characters scored in 82 taxa, including 20 extant species representing all living bat families other than Pteropodidae. We found that phylogenetic relationships of Eocene bats are more complex than previously thought. Numerous families (e.g., †Archaeonycteridae, †Mixopterygidae, †Palaeochiropterygidae) and genera (e.g., †Archaeonycteris, †Icaronycteris, †Carcinipteryx) were found to be non-monophyletic as previously recognized, requiring adjustments to chiropteran taxonomy. Four major clades of stem bats were recovered in our analyses. †Microchiropteryx folieae (~ 54 Ma, India) was recovered as the earliest crown bat, occurring as the most basal lineage of Vespertilionoidea, whereas many putative crown bats were recovered among stem Chiroptera. †Tachypteron franzeni was found to be a crown bat in our analyses, as in previous studies, but it was recovered unexpectedly as a stem miniopterid. The phylogenetic relationships presented here represent the most comprehensive analysis of Eocene bat relationships completed to date, substantially improving our understanding of the position of many fossil taxa within Chiroptera and providing a foundation for future analyses of bat evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed in this study are available on the MorphoBank repository, Project 4619: http://morphobank.org/permalink/?P4619.

References

  • Amador LI, Arévalo RLM, Almeida FC, Catalano SA, Giannini NP (2018) Bat systematics in the light of unconstrained analyses of a comprehensive molecular supermatrix. J Mammal Evol 25(1):37–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-016-9363-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher RJ, Bennett N, Lehmann T (2009) The new framework for understanding placental mammal evolution. BioEssays 31:853–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.200900053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beard KC, Sigé B, Krishtalka L (1992) A primitive vespertilionoid bat from the early Eocene of central Wyoming. CR Acad Sci, Ser II 314(7):735–741.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown EE, Cashmore DD, Simmons NB, Butler RJ (2019) Quantifying the completeness of the bat fossil record. Palaeontology 62(5):757–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle E, Janis CM, Pisani D, Donoghue PCJ, Silvestro D (2023) A timescale for placental mammal diversification based on Bayesian modeling of the fossil record. Curr Biol 33:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clementz M, Bajpai S, Ravikant V, Thewissen JGM, Saravanan N, Singh IB, Prasad V (2010) Early Eocene warming events and the timing of terrestrial faunal exchange between India and Asia. Geology 39(1):15–18. https://doi.org/10.1130/G31585.1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czaplewski NJ, Baker CG (2022) Carnassiform notches improve the functional efficiency of bat molar shearing crests. Acta Palaeontol Pol 67(1):257–282. https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00889.2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaplewski NJ, Morgan GS, Emry RJ, Gignac PM, O’Brien HD (2022) Three new early middle Eocene bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Elderberry Canyon, Nevada, USA. Smithson Contrib Paleobiol 106:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaplewski NJ, Morgan GS, McLeod SA (2007) Chiroptera. In: Janis CM, Gunnell GF, Uhen MD (eds) Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 174–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaplewski NJ, Person J, Boyd C, Emry RJ (2019) A new species of bat (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from the early Oligocene global cooling period, Brule Formation, North Dakota, USA. Palaeovertebrata 42(2):e2. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.42.2.e2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dávalos LM, Velazco PM, Warsi OM, Smits PD, Simmons NB (2014) Integrating incomplete fossils by isolating conflicting signal in saturated and non-independent morphological characters. Syst Biol 63(4):582–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eick GN, Jacobs DS, Matthee CA (2005) A nuclear DNA phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of echolocation and historical biogeography of extant bats (Chiroptera). Mol Biol Evol 22(9):1869–1886. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eiting TP, Gunnell GF (2009) Global completeness of the bat fossil record. J Mammal Evol 16(3):151–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-009-9118-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esselstyn JA, Oliveros CH, Swanson MT, Faircloth BC (2017) Investigating difficult nodes in the placental mammal tree with expanded taxon sampling and thousands of ultraconserved elements. Genome Biol Evol 9:2308–2321. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evx168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Foley NM, Mason VC, Harris AJ, Bredemeyer KR, Damas J, Lewin HA, Eizirik E, Gatesy J, Karlsson EK, Lindblad-Toh K, Zoonomia_Consortium, Springer MS, Murphy WJ (2023) A genomic timescale for placental mammal evolution. Science 380:eabl8189. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl8189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Godthelp H, Archer M, Cifelli R, Hand SJ, Gilkeson CF (1992) Earliest known Australian Tertiary mammal fauna. Nature 356:514–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon KC (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24:774–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnell GF, Jacobs BF, Herendeen PS, Head JJ, Kowalski E, Msuya CP, Mizambwa FA, Harrison T, Habersetzer J, Storch G (2003) Oldest placental mammal from sub-Saharan Africa: Eocene microbat from Tanzania – evidence for early evolution of sophisticated echolocation. Palaeontol Electron 5:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (2005) Fossil evidence and the origin of bats. J Mammal Evol 12(1–2):209–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-005-6945-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnell GF, Simmons NB, Seiffert ER (2014) New Myzopodidae (Chiroptera) from the Late Paleogene of Egypt: emended family diagnosis and biogeographic origins of Noctilionoidea. PLoS One 9(2):e86712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnell GF, Simons EL, Seiffert ER (2008) New bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from the late Eocene and early Oligocene, Fayum Depression, Egypt. J Vertebr Paleontol 28(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[1:nbmcft]2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habersetzer J, Storch G (1987) Klassifikation und funktionelle Flügelmorphologie paläogener Fledermäuse (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Cour Forsch-Inst Senckenberg 91:117–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand SJ (1985) New Miocene megadermatids (Chiroptera: Megadermatidae) from Australia with comments on megadermatid phylogenetics. Aust Mammal 8(1–2):5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand SJ, Beck RM, Archer M, Simmons NB, Gunnell GF, Scofield RP, Tennyson AJ, De Pietri VL, Salisbury SW, Worthy TH (2018) A new, large-bodied omnivorous bat (Noctilionoidea: Mystacinidae) reveals lost morphological and ecological diversity since the Miocene in New Zealand. Sci Rep 8(1):235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18403-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hand SJ, Maugoust J, Beck RMD, Orliac MJ (2023) A 50-million-year-old, three-dimensionally preserved bat skull supports an early origin for modern echolocation. Curr Biol 33:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.09.043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hand S, Novacek M, Godthelp H, Archer M (1994) First Eocene bat from Australia. J Vertebr Paleontol 14(3):375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand SJ, Sigé B (2018) A new archaic bat (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae) from an Early Eocene forest in the Paris Basin. Hist Biol 30(1–2):227–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2017.1297435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand SJ, Sigé B, Archer M, Black KH (2016) An evening bat (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from the late early Eocene of France, with comments on the antiquity of modern bats. Palaeovertebrata 40(2):e2. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.40.2.e2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand SJ, Sigé B, Archer M, Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (2015) A new early Eocene (Ypresian) bat from Pourcy, Paris Basin, France, with comments on patterns of diversity in the earliest chiropterans. J Mammal Evol 22(3):343–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-015-9286-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand S, Sigé B, Maitre E (2012) Necromantis Weithofer, 1887, large carnivorous Middle and Late Eocene bats from the French Quercy Phosphorites: new data and unresolved relationships. In: Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (eds) Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils, Molecules, and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 210–251.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hao X, Lu Q, Zhao H (2023) A molecular phylogeny for all 21 families within Chiroptera (bats). Integr Zool 0:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison DL, Hooker JJ (2010) Late middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae). Acta Chiropt 12(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3161/150811010x504554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermsen EJ, Hendricks JR (2008) W(h)ither fossils? Studying morphological character evolution in the age of molecular sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 95(1):72–100. https://doi.org/10.3417/2006206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horáček I, Špoutil F (2012) Why tribosphenic? On variation and constraint in developmental dynamics of chiropteran molars. In: Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (eds) Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils, Molecules and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 410–455.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jebb D, Huang Z, Pippel M, Hughes GM, Lavrichenko K, Devanna P, Winkler S, Jermiin LS, Skirmuntt EC, Katzourakis A, Burkitt-Gray L, Ray DA, Sullivan KAM, Roscito JG, Kirilenko BM, Dávalos LM, Corthals AP, Power ML, Jones G, Ransome RD, Dechmann DKN, Locatelli AG, Puechmaille SJ, Fedrigo O, Jarvis ED, Hiller M, Vernes SC, Myers EW, Teeling EC (2020) Six reference-quality genomes reveal evolution of bat adaptations. Nature 583:578–584. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2486-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen GL (1966) Early Eocene bat from Wyoming. Science 154:1333–1339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MF, Coster PM, Licht A, Métais G, Ocakoğlu F, Taylor MH, Beard KC (2019) A stem bat (Chiroptera: Palaeochiropterygidae) from the late middle Eocene of northern Anatolia: implications for the dispersal and palaeobiology of early bats. Palaeobiodivers Palaeoenviron 99:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12549-018-0338-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MF, Li Q, Ni X, Beard KC (2021) The earliest Asian bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) address major gaps in bat evolution. Biol Lett 17:20210185. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2021.0185

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre S, Sigé B (1982) La place du “Vespertilion de Montmartre” dans l’histoire des chiroptères molossidés. Actes Symp Paléontol Georges Cuvier:347–361.

  • Lenz OK, Wilde V, Mertz DF, Riegel W (2015) New palynology-based astronomical and revised 40AR/39AR ages for the Eocene maar lake of Messel (Germany). Int J Earth Sci 104:873–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-014-1126-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maitre E (2014) Western European middle Eocene to early Oligocene Chiroptera: systematics, phylogeny and palaeoecology based on new material from the Quercy (France). Swiss J Palaeontol 133(2):141–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-014-0069-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitre E, Sigé B, Escarguel G (2008) A new family of bats in the Paleogene of Europe: Systematics and implications for the origin of emballonurids and rhinolophoids. Neues Jahrb Geol Paläontol Abh 250(2):199–216. https://doi.org/10.1127/0077-7749/2008/0250-0199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marandat B, Crochet J-Y, Godinot M, Hartenberger J-L, Legendre S, Remy JA, Sigé B, Sudre J, Vianey-Liaud M (1993) Une nouvelle faune a mammiferes d’age eocene moyen (Lutetien Superieur) dans les phosphorites du Quercy. Geobios 26(5):617–623.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6995(93)80042-P

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna MC, Bell SK (1997) Classification of mammals: above the species level. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith RW, Janečka JE, Gatesy J, Ryder OA, Fisher CA, Teeling EC, Goodbla A, Eizirik E, Simão TLL, Stadler T, Rabosky DL, Honeycutt RL, Flynn JJ, Ingram CM, Steiner C, Williams TL, Robinson TJ, Burk-Herrick A, Westerman M, Ayoub NA, Springer MS, Murphy WJ (2011) Impacts of the Cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334:521–524. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Butterworth CM, Murphy WJ, O’Brien SJ, Jacobs DS, Springer MS, Teeling EC (2007) A family matter: conclusive resolution of the taxonomic position of the long-fingered bats, Miniopterus. Mol Biol Evol 24(7):1553–1561. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan GS, Czaplewski NJ (2003) A new bat (Chiroptera: Natalidae) from the Early Miocene of Florida, with comments on Natalid phylogeny. J Mammal 84(2):729–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novacek MJ (1985) Evidence for echolocation in the oldest known bats. Nature 315:140–141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary MA, Bloch JI, Flynn JJ, Gaudin TJ, Giallombardo A, Giannini NP, Goldberg SL, Kraatz BP, Luo Z-X, Meng J, Ni X, Novacek MJ, Perini FA, Randall ZS, Rougier GW, Sargis EJ, Silcox MT, Simmons NB, Spaulding M, Velazco PM, Weksler M, Wible JR, Cirranello AL (2013) The placental mammal ancestor and the post K-Pg radiation of placentals. Science 339:662–667. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1229237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrander GE (1983) New early Oligocene (Chadronian) mammals from the Raben Ranch Local Fauna, northwest Nebraska. J Paleontol 57(1):128–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrander GE (1985) Correlation of the early Oligocene (Chadronian) in northwestern Nebraska. Dakoterra 2(2):205–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrander GE (1987) The early Oligocene (Chadronian) Raben Ranch local fauna, northwest Nebraska: Marsupialia, Insectivora, Dermoptera, Chiroptera, and Primates. Dakoterra 3:92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravel A, Adaci M, Bensalah M, Charruault A-L, Essid EM, Ammar HK, Marzougui W, Mahboubi M, Mebrouk F, Merzeraud G (2016) Origin and radiation of modern bats: new discoveries in the Eocene of North Africa. Geodiversitas 38(3):355–434. https://doi.org/10.5252/g2016n3a3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravel A, Adaci M, Bensalah M, Mahboubi M, Mebrouk F, Essid EM, Marzougui W, Ammar HK, Charruault A-L, Lebrun R, Tabuce R, Vianey-Liaud M, Marivaux L (2015) New philisids (Mammalia, Chiroptera) from the Early–Middle Eocene of Algeria and Tunisia: new insight into the phylogeny, palaeobiogeography and palaeoecology of the Philisidae. J Syst Palaeontol 13(8):691–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2014.941422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravel A, Marivaux L, Qi T, Wang Y-Q, Beard KC (2014) New chiropterans from the middle Eocene of Shanghuang (Jiangsu Province, Coastal China): new insight into the dawn horseshoe bats (Rhinolophidae) in Asia. Zool Scr 43(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravel A, Marivaux L, Tabuce R, Adaci M, Mahboubi M, Mebrouk F, Bensalah M (2011) The oldest African bat from the early Eocene of El Kohol (Algeria). Naturwissenschaften 98(5):397–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0785-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ravel A, Marivaux L, Tabuce R, Ben Haj Ali M, Essid EM, Vianey-Liaud M (2012) A new large philisid (Mammalia, Chiroptera, Vespertilionoidea) from the late Early Eocene of Chambi, Tunisia. Palaeontology 55(5):1035–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01160.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revilliod P (1920) Contribution à l’étude des chiroptères des terrains tertiaires. Deuxième partie. Mém Soc Paléontol Suisse 44:63–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietbergen TB, van den Hoek Ostende LW, Aase A, Jones MF, Medeiros ED, Simmons NB (2023) The oldest known bat skeletons and their implications for Eocene chiropteran diversification. PLoS One 18(4):e0283505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Russell DE, Louis P, Savage DE (1973) Chiroptera and Dermoptera of the French early Eocene. Univ Calif Publ Geol Sci 95:1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiffert ER (2006) Revised age estimates for the later Paleogene mammal faunas of Egypt and Oman. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(13):5000–5005. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600689103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sigé B (1974) Données nouvelles sur le genre Stehlinia (Vespertilionoidea, Chiroptera) du Paléogène d’Europe. Palaeovertebrata 6:253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigé B (1985) Les chiroptères oligocènes du Fayum, Egypte. Geol Palaeontol 19:161–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigé B (1991) Rhinolophoidea et Vespertilionoidea (Chiroptera) du Chambi (Eocene inferieur de Tunisie) Aspects biostratigraphique, biogeographique et paleoecologique de l’origine des chiropteres modernes. Neues Jahrb Geol Paläontol Abh 182(3):355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigé B (1997) Les remplissages karstiques polyphasés (Eocène, Oligocène, Pliocène) de St-Maximin (Phospohorites du Gard) et leur apport à la connaissance des faunes européenes, notamment pour l’Eocène moyen (MP 13). 3 – Systématique: Euthériens entomophage. In: Aguilar J-P, Legendre S, Michaux J (eds) Actes du Congrès Biochrom ‘97, Montpellier 14–17 avril: biochronologie mammalienne du cénozoïque en Europe et domaines reliés. Institut Montpellier, Montpellier, pp 737–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigé B (2011) Cryptobune nov. gen., chiroptère carnivore des phosphorites du Quercy, SW France. Bull Soc Hist Nat Toulouse 147:47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigé B, Maitre E, Hand S (2012) Necromantodonty, the primitive condition of lower molars among bats. In: Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (eds) Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils, Molecules and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 456–469.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sigé B, Thomas H, Sen S, Gheerbrant E, Roger J, Al-Sulaimani Z (1994) Les chiroptères de Taqah (Oligocène inférieur, Sultanat d’Oman). Premier inventaire systématique. Münchner Geowiss Abh 26:35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons NB, Cirranello AL (2023) Bat Species of the World: A taxonomic and geographic database https://batnames.org.Accessed3/17/23

  • Simmons NB, Geisler JH (1998) Phylogenetic relationships of Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris, and Palaeochiropteryx to extant bat lineages. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 235(1):1-182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons NB, Seiffert ER, Gunnell GF (2016) A new family of large omnivorous bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera) from the late Eocene of the Fayum Depression, Egypt, with comments on use of the name “Eochiroptera”. Am Mus Novit 3857:1–43. https://doi.org/10.1206/3857.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons NB, Seymour KL, Habersetzer J, Gunnell GF (2008) Primitive Early Eocene bat from Wyoming and the evolution of flight and echolocation. Nature 451(7180):818–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter BH (1970) Evolutionary trends of chiropteran dentitions. In: Slaughter BH, Walton DW (eds) About Bats: A Chiropteran Biology Symposium. Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas, pp 51–83.

  • Smith T, Habersetzer J, Simmons NB, Gunnell GF (2012) Systematics and paleobiogeography of early bats. In: Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (eds) Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils Molecules and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 23–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith T, Rana RS, Missiaen P, Rose KD, Sahni A, Singh H, Singh L (2007) High bat (Chiroptera) diversity in the Early Eocene of India. Naturwissenschaften 94(12):1003–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0280-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R, Russell DE (1992) Mammifères (Marsupialia, Chiroptera) de l’Yprésien de la Belgique. Bull Inst R Sci Natl Belg, Sciences de la Terre 62:223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speijer RP, Pälike H, Hollis CJ, Hooker JJ, Ogg JG (2020) The Paleogene Period. In: Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Schmitz MD, Ogg GM (eds) Geologic Time Scale 2020. 2. Elsevier, 1087–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-1-02369-3

  • Springer MS, Stanhope MJ, Madsen O, de Jong WW (2004) Molecules consolidate the placental mammal tree. Trends Ecol Evol 19(8):430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.05.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Storch G, Sige B, Habersetzer J (2002) Tachypteron franzeni n. gen., n. sp., earliest emballonurid bat from the Middle Eocene of Messel (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Palaontol Z 76(2):189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabuce R, Antunes MT, Sigé B (2009) A new primitive bat from the earliest Eocene of Europe. J Vertebr Paleontol 29(2):627–630. https://doi.org/10.1671/039.029.0204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teeling EC, Dool S, Springer MS (2012) Phylogenies, fossils and functional genes: the evolution of echolocation in bats. In: Gunnell GF, Simmons NB (eds) Evolutionary History of Bats: Fossils, Molecules and Morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teeling EC, Madsen O, Van den Bussche RA, de Jong WW, Stanhope MJ, Springer MS (2002) Microbat paraphyly and the convergent evolution of a key innovation in Old World rhinolophoid microbats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(3):1431–1436. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.022477199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Teeling EC, Springer MS, Madsen O, Bates P, O’Brien S J, Murphy WJ (2005) A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307(5709):580–584. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1105113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tejedor MF, Czaplewski NJ, Goin FJ, Aragon E (2005) The oldest record of South American bats. J Vertebr Paleontol 25(4):990–993. https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634%282005%29025%5B0990%3ATOROSA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong Y (1997) Middle Eocene small mammals from Liguanqiao Basin of Henan province and Yuanqu Basin of Shanxi province, central China. Palaeontol Sin 18:1–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen LM (1979) The evolution of bats. Evol Theory 4:103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velazco PM, Buczek AJ, Hoffman E, Hoffman DK, O’Leary MA, Novacek MJ (2022) Combined data analysis of fossil and living mammals: a Paleogene sister taxon of Placentalia and the antiquity of Marsupialia. Cladistics 38(3):359–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Megan Sims (KU Vertebrate Paleontology), Maria Eifler (KU Mammalogy), Amy Henrici (Carnegie Museum of Natural History), Marisa Surovy, Eleanor Hoeger, Sara Ketelsen, Neil Duncan, Judy Galkin, and Alana Gishlick (American Museum of Natural History) for access to specimens and casts used in this study. We thank Justin Baez, Nate Upham, Tim Rietbergen, Edward Medieros, Paúl Velazco, Nick Czaplewski, Suzanne Hand, Thierry Smith, Paulyn Cartwright, Xijun Ni, Rafe Brown, and Paul Selden for helpful discussions and advice regarding this project and bat morphology. We thank Robin Beck and two anonymous reviewers for comments that have greatly improved the manuscript. This work was funded in part by a Society of Systematic Biologists Mini-ARTS Grant to MFJ, University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute Panorama Grant to MFJ, and by the David B. Jones Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.F.J., K.C.B., and N.B.S. conceptualized the project. M.F.J. and N.B.S. designed the methodology. M.F.J. conducted analyses with input from K.C.B. and N.B.S. M.F.J. prepared the original draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript, and approved the final version for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew F. Jones.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Resource 1 (866 KB) (download PDF )

Online Resource 2 (146 KB) (download TXT )

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Synapomorphies of major clades (see Online Resource 1: Table S3 for list of synapomorphies for all clades). See Fig. 6 for numbering of nodes. Additionally, note that MorphoBank characters begin with Character 1, whereas TNT characters begin with Character 0. The characters listed below are numbered following MorphoBank formatting and therefore begin with Character 1. If comparing the characters below to the TNT script (Online Resource 2P), subtract 1 from the character number.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Full size image

Nodes referenced in Appendix 1

Node 1 – Clade A

24:

upper canine with raised anteromedial cingulum, but no cusp

39:

more recurved upper canine

47:

P3 absent

220:

Lower molars with lingual cusps < 75% height of labial cusps

Node 7 – Necromantidae

24:

upper canine with low anteromedial accessory cusp

25:

upper canine with anteromedial groove

29:

lingual cingulum of upper canine not steeply sloped

32:

upper canine with large distal cingulum

136:

M3 with long parastyle

245:

m1 entoconid weakly developed and low

263:

m2 entoconid weakly developed and low

Node 9 – Khonsunycteris and Witwatia (?Philisidae)

166:

lower canine without posterobasal cusp

216:

myotodont lower molars

234:

m1-2 with large hypoconulid

Node 14 – Clade B

103:

M1 preparacrista shorter than postparacrista

119:

M2 with single ectoflexus between parastyle and mesostyle region

168:

lower canine without labial cingulum

263:

m2 entoconid weak and low

Node 20 – Clade C

72:

upper molar ectocingula present but weak

174:

p2 shorter than p3

181:

p3 with anterolingual cuspule

206:

p4 with short postmetacristid

396:

one to two vertebrae articulate with ilium

398:

at least some sacral or caudal vertebrae in contact ischium by suture or fusion

450:

scapula with thick lip on axillary border

460:

scapula with crest near caudal border

468:

coracoclavicular joint absent

470:

humerofemoral index greater than 150

479:

small deltoid tubercle on humerus

563:

metacarpal II shorter than metacarpal IV

584:

digit II of wing proximal and intermediate phalanges length subequal

Node 21 – Archaeonycteridae s.l.

195:

p4 without lingual cingulid

210:

p4 tribosphenic, with distinct trigonid and talonid

253:

m1 with deep hypoflexid

255:

m2-3 paraconid slightly shorter than metaconid

275:

m3 with deep hypoflexid

Node 26 – Philisidae s.s.

82:

M1-2 angle between postparacrista and premetacrista 20 degrees or less

83:

M1-2 postparacrista does not contact premetacrista, trigon open

106:

M1 postprotocrista oriented toward a point between metacone and hypocone regions

119:

M2 with single ectoflexus between parastyle and mesostyle regions

253:

m1 with deep hypoflexid

Node 27 – Clade D

72:

upper molars with strong ectocingula

Node 29 – Hassianycteridae s.s.

187:

p3 height slightly shorter than p4 height

203:

p4 without metaconid

270:

m3 labial cingulid weakly developed

Node 30 – Clade E

188:

p3-4 subequal in length

261:

m2 labial cingulid weakly developed

270:

m3 labial cingulid weakly developed

Node 33 – Onychonycteridae s.l.

224:

lower molar cristids obliqua oriented toward protoconid

276:

m3 entocristid parallel to long axis of the tooth

Node 40 – Icaronycteridae s.l.

111:

M1 hypocone shelf small

113:

M1 hypocone incipient or poorly developed

181:

p3 anterolingual cuspule present

193:

p4 paraconid large and high

246:

m1 labial cingulid strongly developed

Node 42 – Icaronycteridae s.s.

138:

M3 paraconule present

139:

M3 postmetacrista present

140:

M3 premetacrista and postparacrista lengths subequal

Node 43 – crown bats

12:

I1 separated from i1 by large gap when cheek teeth are in occlusion

22:

upper canine anteroposteriorly elongated

85:

M1-2 mesostyle formed at contact between postparacrista and premetacrista

117:

M2 parastyle short

118:

M2 parastyle straight

136:

M3 parastyle short

194:

p4 paracristid absent

220:

lower molar lingual cusps less than 75% height of labial cusps

379:

posterior spinous process of thoracic vertebrae absent

386:

transverse processes of lumbar vertebrae caudotransversely oriented

434:

xiphoid process longer than longest sternebra

459:

scapula with convex cranial margin

477:

humerus with convex posterior edge

505:

distal styloid process of humerus well developed

518:

anconeal process of ulna further cranial than coronoid process

539:

scaphoid facet for trapezium grooved

600:

total craniocaudal length of pubis between 1.0-1.5x length of acetabulum

604:

lunate surface of acetabulum inverted U-shaped

606:

ischiatic spine absent

616:

greater trochanter of femur markedly shorter than femoral head

640:

incomplete fibula

695:

proximal phalanx of digit I of pes longer than that of digit III

Node 44 – Rhinolophoidea

24:

upper canine with low anteromedial accessory cusp

35:

upper canine with tall, conspicuous posterolateral accessory cusp that is less than ½ height of main cusp

47:

P3 absent

84:

M1-2 with narrow and deep trigon

112:

M1 hypocone shelf wider than trigon basin

159:

lower incisors not procumbent

175:

p3 absent

242:

m1 metacristid present

253:

m1 hypoflexid deep

265:

m2 hypoflexid deep

362:

cervical vertebrae C4-6 with concave posterior edge of lamina

367:

cervical vertebra C7 spinous process projects dorsally

387:

anterior transverse processes of lumbar vertebrae vertically directed

547:

trapezium smaller than trapezoid

686:

foot length 33-50% tibia length

Node 49 – Megadermatidae (Megaderma + Saharaderma)

193:

p4 paraconid absent

195:

p4 with complete lingual cingulid

208:

p4 protoconid more robust, shorter, more blunt

236:

m1 shorter than m2

245:

m1 entoconid weakly developed and low

252:

m1 talonid and trigonid subequal

263:

m2 entoconid weakly developed and low

Node 50 – Yangochiroptera

140:

M3 premetacrista subequal in length or longer than postparacrista

260:

m2 protoconid slightly higher than hypoconid

304:

medial edge of premaxilla nasal process medially twisted

366:

cervical vertebra C7 spinous process absent

395:

sacroiliac articulation fused

445:

wide infraspinous fossa of scapula

534:

sesamoid element present dorsal to trapezium–metacarpal I articulation

540:

joint for scaphoid on trapezium vertical wedge-shaped

577:

second phalanx of manus digit II unossified or absent

599:

anterior edge of pubic symphysis broad U-shaped in ventral view

617:

anteroposterior depth of greater trochanter of femur greater than transverse width

621:

third trochanter of femur less than 10% maximum length of the femur

681:

calcar present

Node 51 – Vespertilionoidea s.l.

235:

entocristid of m1-2 high crest

276:

m3 entocristid parallel to long axis of tooth

Node 53 – Myzopodidae (Myzopoda + Phasmatonycteris)

176:

single rooted p3

187:

p3 height much shorter than p4 height

188:

p3 less than or equal to ½ length of p4

189:

p3 and p4 with different crown morphologies

210:

p4 without distinct cusps

222:

lower molars with strongly developed notches in paracristid and protocristid

228:

lower molar entocristids short or disrupted so talonids drain lingually

250:

m1 paraconid situated labial to a line drawn through the metaconid and entoconid

Node 55 – Vespertilionoidea s.s.

123:

M2 postmetacrista much longer than premetacrista but not 2x length

166:

lower canine without posterobuccal cusp

188:

p3-4 subequal in length

274:

m3 protoconid slightly higher than hypoconid

499:

trochlea of humerus position midline with respect to shaft axis

500:

trochlea width intermediate with respect to condyle width

Node 58 – Molossidae (Tadarida + Cuvierimops)

30:

upper canine with well-developed, complete labial cingulum

61:

P4 lingual cingular cusp well developed

98:

M1 parastyle straight

113:

M1 hypocone well developed

130:

M2 hypocone well developed

136:

M3 parastyle long

166:

lower canine posterobasal cusp weakly developed

203:

p4 with single metaconid

Node 60 – Miniopteridae s.l. (Miniopterus + Tachypteron)

80:

M1-2 protocone more sharp and more anteriorly inclined

84:

M1-2 trigon narrow and deep

104:

M1 postmetacrista length subequal to premetacrista length

168:

M1 postmetacrista length subequal to premetacrista length

216:

lower molars nyctalodont

252:

m1 talonid and trigonid subequal in width

385:

five lumbar vertebrae present

563:

metacarpal II longer than metacarpal IV

Node 62 – Cistugidae s.l. (Cistugo + Chadronycteris)

62:

P4 labial cingulum weakly developed

67:

P4 with one distal accessory cusp

109:

M1 endoloph absent

117:

M2 with long parastyle

141:

M3 metacone indistinct, incorporated into premetacrista

Node 64 – Noctilionoidea

12:

Upper and lower first incisors in contact or separated by small gap when cheek teeth in occlusion

104:

M1 postmetacrista subequal in length to premetacrista

124:

M2 postprotocrista oriented toward midpoint between metacone and hypocone regions

216:

lower molars myotodont

506:

distal styloid process of humerus medially positioned in epitrochlea

Node 69 – Emballonuroidea s.l.

38:

posterolabial surface of upper canine rounded

67:

P4 with one distal accessory cusp

100:

M1 with single, deep ectoflexus

125:

M2 endoloph present, approaches postprotocrista at angle

196:

p4 labial cingulid weakly developed

218:

lower molar talonid basins shallow

272:

m3 cristid obliqua present but does not reach trigonid

Node 73 – Emballonuroidea s.s. (Nycteris + Saccopteryx)

38:

posterolabial surface of upper canine flattened

109:

M1 endoloph present and continuous with postprotocrista

156:

i3 present

165:

lower canine with broad posterior cingulid

224:

lower molars cristid obliqua oriented toward metaconid

242:

m1 metacristid present

253:

m1 hypoflexid deep

265:

m2 hypoflexid deep

275:

m3 hypoflexid deep

279:

m3 hypoconulid absent

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, M.F., Beard, K.C. & Simmons, N.B. Phylogeny and systematics of early Paleogene bats. J Mammal Evol 31, 18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-024-09705-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-024-09705-8

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Matthew F. Jones
  2. K. Christopher Beard
  3. Nancy B. Simmons
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.