Skip to main content
Log in

The category of finite sets and Cartesian closed categories

  • Published:
Journal of Soviet Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Applying methods of the proof theory, it is shown that two canonical morphisms are equal in all Cartesian closed categories if and only if some of their realizations in the category of finite sets are equal. All realizations of formal combinations of objects using the functors x and hom are isomorphic in all Cartesian closed categories if and only if some of their realizations in the category of finite sets are isomorphic. On the base of these results, a purely syntactic decision algorithm for (extensional) isomorphism of formal combinations of objects and a new decision algorithm for equality of canonical morphisms are obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. J. Lambek, “Deductive systems and categories. I,” Math. Syst. Theory, No. 2, 287–318 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Lambek, “Deductive systems and categories. II,” in: Lecture Notes Math., Vol. 86 (1969), pp. 76–122.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Lambek, “Deductive systems and categories. III,” in: Lecture Notes Math., Vol. 274 (1972), pp. 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Lambek, “Fromλ-calculus to Cartesian closed categories,” Preprint, McGill University, Montreal (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Mann, “The connection between equivalence of proofs and Cartesian closed categories,” Proc. London Math. Soc.,31, No. 3, 289–310 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. E. Mints, “Category theory and proof theorey. I,” in: Actual Questions of Logic and Science Methodology [in Russian], Kiev (1980), pp. 252–278.

  7. G. E. Mints, “Closed categories and proof theory,” Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningr. Otd. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR,68, 197–208 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Szabo, “A categorical equivalence of proofs,” Notre Dame J. Form. Log.,15, No. 2, 171–191 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yu. L. Ershov, Theory of Numerations [in Russian], Moscow (1977).

  10. D. Prawitz, Natural Deduction. A Proof Theoretical Study, Stockholm (1965).

  11. S. MacLane, “Topology and logic as a source of algebra,” Bull. Am. Math. Soc.,82, No. 1, 1–40 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov Leningradskogo Otdeleniya Matematicheskogo Instituta im. V. A. Steklova AN SSSR, Vol. 105, pp. 174–194, 1981.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solov'ev, S.V. The category of finite sets and Cartesian closed categories. J Math Sci 22, 1387–1400 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01084396

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01084396

Keywords

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.