Found 1 record.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 7684, "OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Advertisement", November 2015

Errata ID: 8104
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Kris Michielsen
Date Reported: 2024-09-16
Verifier Name: Gunter Van de Velde
Date Verified: 2024-09-16

Section 2.1 says:

   Route Type
      The type of the OSPFv2 route.  If the route type is 0
      (Unspecified), the information inside the OSPFv2 External Prefix
      TLV applies to the prefix regardless of prefix's route type.  This
      is useful when prefix-specific attributes are advertised by an
      external entity that is not aware of the route type associated
      with the prefix.  Supported types are:

It should say:

   Route Type
      The type of the OSPFv2 route.  If the route type is 0
      (Unspecified), the information inside the OSPFv2 Extended Prefix
      TLV applies to the prefix regardless of prefix's route type.  This
      is useful when prefix-specific attributes are advertised by an
      external entity that is not aware of the route type associated
      with the prefix.  Supported types are:

Notes:

s/External Prefix/Extended Prefix/

Report New Errata