The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20201031103331/https://github.com/topics/jsx
Skip to content
#

jsx

aurelia logo

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Here are 2,521 public repositories matching this topic...

yew
nick-at-hawkfish
nick-at-hawkfish commented Jan 27, 2020

It would be nice to have a babel macro that automatically runs the babel plugin to remove the runtime. That way, this project would work out of the box with "zero" config tools like create-react-app.

I'm thinking it could be something like:

import {html} from 'htm/preact/macro'

This is similar conceptually to CSS-IN-JS libraries providing a macro for their tools. See https://e

eliotsykes
eliotsykes commented Oct 3, 2019

I'm sorry to post an issue that is missing crucial evidence, but some debugging of a recent config loading bug makes me suspect that the react-rails railtie.rb may be modifying the load order of initializers, and preventing the values in Rails.application.config being as expected.

Whether this happens or not appears to be partly dependent on where in the Gemfile the react-rails gem is l

ChALkeR
ChALkeR commented Jan 7, 2020

To reproduce:

$ npm pack styled-jsx@3.2.4
npm notice
npm notice 📦  styled-jsx@3.2.4
npm notice === Tarball Contents ===
npm notice 6.1kB  dist/.DS_Store
npm notice 599B   dist/_constants.js
npm notice 22.3kB dist/_utils.js
npm notice 8.2kB  dist/babel-external.js
npm notice 46B    babel-test.js
npm notice 753B   dist/babel-test.js
npm notice 41B    babel.js
npm notice 10.4k
solid
ryansolid
ryansolid commented Jun 3, 2020

I really would appreciate feedback here. It is so hard for me to see it since I've been so close to this for so long and I've developed apps in this manner for 10 years. I'm going to be the worst person to write the documentation since it is all so second nature for me. Yet, I am most likely going to be the person writing the documentation since I understand how everything works so well.

So can

brainkim
brainkim commented Oct 29, 2020

Rendering something like <div>{[]}</div> will fail to clear the div of user-created DOM nodes (my current use-case is a content-editable). This was done so that the user could manually insert children into crank-created DOM nodes without having Crank interfere. Currently, we check the length of the normalized array of child nodes passed into the arrange() method, but I sorta want the DOM nodes

You can’t perform that action at this time.
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.