jsx
Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.
Here are 2,521 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Oct 31, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 22, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Sep 30, 2020 - JavaScript
Babel Macro
It would be nice to have a babel macro that automatically runs the babel plugin to remove the runtime. That way, this project would work out of the box with "zero" config tools like create-react-app.
I'm thinking it could be something like:
import {html} from 'htm/preact/macro'This is similar conceptually to CSS-IN-JS libraries providing a macro for their tools. See https://e
I'm sorry to post an issue that is missing crucial evidence, but some debugging of a recent config loading bug makes me suspect that the react-rails railtie.rb may be modifying the load order of initializers, and preventing the values in Rails.application.config being as expected.
Whether this happens or not appears to be partly dependent on where in the Gemfile the react-rails gem is l
To reproduce:
$ npm pack styled-jsx@3.2.4
npm notice
npm notice 📦 styled-jsx@3.2.4
npm notice === Tarball Contents ===
npm notice 6.1kB dist/.DS_Store
npm notice 599B dist/_constants.js
npm notice 22.3kB dist/_utils.js
npm notice 8.2kB dist/babel-external.js
npm notice 46B babel-test.js
npm notice 753B dist/babel-test.js
npm notice 41B babel.js
npm notice 10.4k-
Updated
Aug 22, 2020 - JavaScript
I really would appreciate feedback here. It is so hard for me to see it since I've been so close to this for so long and I've developed apps in this manner for 10 years. I'm going to be the worst person to write the documentation since it is all so second nature for me. Yet, I am most likely going to be the person writing the documentation since I understand how everything works so well.
So can
-
Updated
Aug 9, 2019 - JavaScript
Rendering something like <div>{[]}</div> will fail to clear the div of user-created DOM nodes (my current use-case is a content-editable). This was done so that the user could manually insert children into crank-created DOM nodes without having Crank interfere. Currently, we check the length of the normalized array of child nodes passed into the arrange() method, but I sorta want the DOM nodes
-
Updated
Jul 30, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Nov 6, 2019 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Sep 30, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 25, 2020 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Oct 29, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 19, 2020 - Emacs Lisp
-
Updated
Aug 6, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Aug 7, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Sep 8, 2020 - JavaScript
Blocked By: wix/vscode-glean#97
Example:
class Foo extends Component {
render() {
return (<div>
{this.props.foo.map((bar) => <div>{bar.x}</div>)}
</div>)
}
}
Current:
const Foo = props => {
const foo = useRef();
const x = useRef();
return <div>
{foo.current.map(bar => <div>{x.current}</div>)}
-
Updated
Aug 18, 2020 - TypeScript


The documentation contains a few references to issues from the now archived yewstack/docs repository.
Since the docs repository is read-only, the same issues should be re-created here and the links in the docs should be updated to point to the new issue.
"Contribute to our docs" links