Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upGitHub is where the world builds software
Millions of developers and companies build, ship, and maintain their software on GitHub — the largest and most advanced development platform in the world.
Switch to MIT license #46
Comments
|
Fine with me. Thanks for your work on this. |
|
No problem from me, thanks for the heads up!
…On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Leonard ***@***.***> wrote:
Fine with me. Thanks for your work on this.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#46 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQuh0qqomQDbxM0-HBkL_RbK1mML1dAks5r-Nx3gaJpZM4NohK6>
.
|
|
Sounds perfect to me ;-) |
|
Fine by me, thanks. |
|
Sounds good to me. |
|
A agree with a switch to the MIT license. |
|
No problem |
|
Great so far. Only 3 signatures left. @tek @huwenchao @robled, do you agree to license your contributions to libtmux under the MIT license? If you do, reply that you agree! |
|
sure! |
|
Approved.
…On 06/21/2017 12:57 AM, Tony Narlock wrote:
Great so far. Only 3 signatures left.
@tek <https://github.com/tek> @huwenchao <https://github.com/huwenchao>
@robled <https://github.com/robled>, do you agree to license your
contributions to libtmux under the MIT license
<https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>? If you do, reply that you agree!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#46 (comment)>, or
mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADEBKOtp7IkSXaznhIbbrGRUp4y2SFq3ks5sGKKjgaJpZM4NohK6>.
|
|
@huwenchao, do you approve the license change? |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had This bot is used to handle issues where the issue hasn't been discussed or |
|
@huwenchao has contributed one single line to this project: https://github.com/tony/libtmux/blame/master/README.rst#L101 Perhaps there is something we can do to push the MIT licensing forward without that contribution. |
|
@dankrause Correct. We can. BSD licenses aren't viral. The codebase can be MIT except for that one commit. And technically we could rebase it out. @huwenchao One more try, are you OK relicensing your commit MIT? We only need one person left for this! |
|
It's been several months of asking. 86e1089 by @huwenchao is a typo. This is getting out of hand. We obviously want spelling corrections, but we can't hold up a LICENSE change forever. I'm going to revert @huwenchao's typo fix. Then redo the typo myself (by inference licensing it MIT), thanking @huwenchao, linking to the original ref (licensed BSD). |
This reverts commit 86e1089. See also: #46 (comment) I will be recorrecting the typo myself immediately after this ref, and licensing it MIT, to complete our licensing conversion.
Credits to @huwenchao at 86e1089 for spotting this typo. This was reverted in 350248c to complete the BSD-to-MIT relicensing in this thread: #46
|
See the revert at 350248c. See the typo fixed by me, licensed MIT, thanking @huwenchao at 928ecc1. |
(See also tmux-python/tmuxp#264)
This project is currently licensed BSD 3-Clause. Apologies if this causes any interruption.
I would like to relicense the project under MIT. If you agree to licensing your contribution(s) to libtmux under the MIT license, please reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: