From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Shortcut: WP:DELT

This page transcludes (or when this is not feasible, links to) all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.

1 Speedy deletion candidates
2 Articles
3 Files
- 3.1 Possibly unfree files
  - 3.1.1 March 4
- 3.2 Files for deletion
  - 3.2.1 March 4
4 Categories
- 4.1 March 4
5 Redirects
- 5.1 March 4
6 Templates
- 6.1 March 4
  - 6.1.1 Template:Filet-O-Fish
  - 6.1.2 Template:2011 Southeastern Conference football navbox
7 Stub types
8 Miscellany (WikiProjects, user pages, etc.)
9 Deletion review
- 9.1 4 March 2012
  - 9.1.1 Laura Massey

[edit] Speedy deletion candidates

The category is at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.

[edit] Articles

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

< 3 March	5 March >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

[edit] Stained glass windows of St Pauls, Clifton

(Find sources: "Stained glass windows of St Pauls, Clifton" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

No notability established, and little hope for finding sources. I took a look and saw nothing in reliable sources about this set of windows. Binksternet (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] All-time Albanian Superliga table

(Find sources: "All-time Albanian Superliga table" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

I PRODed this a few months ago and it was deleted, but now that it's been recreated I'm hoping we can get a final decision at AfD. As some may remember, a lot of these "all-time tables" were deleted six months ago and I stand by the rationale I used then: It is arguably a violation of WP:NOTSTATS, but more importantly, I can't see any evidence that it is notable. In addition, this article is unreferenced. Jenks24 (talk) 08:27, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Also, it has a duplicate article, Albanian Superliga Ranking. If the result is delete, they should both be deleted; if kept, one should be redirected to the other. Jenks24 (talk) 08:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Jenks24 (talk) 08:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Jenks24 (talk) 08:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Jenks24 (talk) 08:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete as original research. The list is lacking the slightest source. – Kosm1 fent 09:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Smiley (2012 film)

(Find sources: "Smiley (2012 film)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

There's a complete lack of reliable sources about this on the internet and the article itself only has two sources, both of which are brief blurbs about the trailer. I've tried to find sources but other than a small flurry of activity centering around the movie's trailer, there's no concrete release date and no other information about the movie. Article was DE-PRODed with the claim that once the movie comes out, it'll be big, which is WP:CRYSTALBALL. Nominating for deletion because while I do think the movie will be big once it comes out, there's no release date and the film does not pass WP:NFF in the here and now. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Inspector General Gerald Walpin firing controversy

(Find sources: "Inspector General Gerald Walpin firing controversy" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Wikipedia is not the place for partisan advocacy; there isn't even a Wikipedia article about Gerald Walpin (not that there should be); Walpin's wrongful-termination lawsuit was dismissed; this dismissal is uncontroversial except among a few notably partisan sources. —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:50, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep The subject is not "partisan." On the contrary, the article cites multiple examples of Democrats criticizing Obama on this issue.

Furthermore, the Associated Press, The Washington Post, Politico, and thehill.com are all cited in the article, and none of them are "partisan."

The reliable sources report the facts. The article is not POV. Instead, the article cites reliably sourced facts. All of the information in the article is true and reliably sourced. The article meets all of wikipedia's policies.

In order to debunk the nominator's claim that the article is "partisan," I would like to quote these two paragraphs from the article:

On June 16, 2009, U.S. Senator Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri), said the president failed to follow a law that she had sponsored, which requires that the President give Congress 30 days advance notice of an inspector general's firing, along with the cause for the firing. McCaskill stated, "Loss of confidence is not a sufficient reason." She also stated, "I'm hopeful the White House will provide a more substantive rationale, in writing, as quickly as possible." That same day, a White House lawyer said that Walpin was fired because he was "unduly disruptive" and engaged in "trouble and inappropriate conduct."[3]

On June 23, 2009, a bipartisan group of 145 current and former public officials, attorneys, and legal scholars signed a letter that was sent to the White House, which defended Walpin, said the criticisms of him were not true, and said that his firing was politically motivated. Signers of the letter included Michael Mukasey (former Attorney General), Bernard Nussbaum (President Clinton’s former counsel), former U.S. Attorneys Otto Obermaier, John Martin, Zachary Carter, and Andrew Maloney, and six former and current presidents of the Federal Bar Council.[5] The letter can be read here.

Therefore, the article is not "partisan" at all.

Since this debunks the entire reason for the nomination, I propose a speedy keep, and that this debate discussion be ended.

Friendly Freeper (talk) 08:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Li Huang (mathematician)

(Find sources: "Li Huang (mathematician)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

The article is hard to believe, including many fabricated information, such as "Nobel Prize for Mathematics". Makecat _Talk 07:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy delete as a hoax. There is no Nobel Prize for math, and nobody has won three of any variety. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Chinese mathematicians rankings

(Find sources: "Chinese mathematicians rankings" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Completely original research. Makecat _Talk 07:50, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Delete per nom, possibly speedily as a hoax. Einstein and Hawking are Chinese? The first five are redlinks and the eighth blatantly nonsensical and also up for Afd. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Southside Royal Crips

(Find sources: "Southside Royal Crips" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Copied from Crips Makecat _Talk 07:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

~~I have nominated for speedy - CSD A10.~~ nancy 07:52, 4 March 2012 (UTC) Speedy withdrawn. Not a clearcut A10 any more. nancy 08:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Alkovi

(Find sources: "Alkovi" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

An article Chisu already exists and its only source is "www.itunes.com." Lacking more reputable sources, I think this article must be redirected to Chisu or simply deleted. dci | TALK 06:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Delete - itunes.com is a retail site, if that is only RS available, it doesn't make sense -- Tawker (talk) 06:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Payday monsanto

(Find sources: "Payday monsanto" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

The article's subject may well be notable, but its content is unacceptable, including unsourced and highly-controversial statements and allusions. dci | TALK 06:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Delete, in agreement with the nomination. This article would need a complete rewrite. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Shrisudharshannathji

(Find sources: "Shrisudharshannathji" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

I can't source this looking at a variety of spellings. It isn't mentioned in our article on Bhopal where it is supposed to be. I raised this on the related Wikiproject and got no response. Dougweller (talk) 05:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] List of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon Episodes

(Find sources: "List of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon Episodes" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

There is no need of such article, because it's incomplete and it's almost impossible to list and summarize 192-odd episodes (still counting). Titles are fan made, very unlikely that summaries have any sort of correctness. Main article is victimized by a troop of fans. Non-maintainable. — Bill william compton^Talk 05:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Delete. Fan-made, unreferenced plot-only summaries edited mostly by a handful of editors who only ever edit this article and the article about the show itself. Wikipedia is not a fansite or the TV listings. JIP | Talk 07:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Wallace C. Piotrowski

(Find sources: "Wallace C. Piotrowski" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable person, fails WP:GNG Sudo Ghost 05:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETE. JIP | Talk 07:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Nodepx

(Find sources: "Nodepx" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Though this may be a genuine product, this is unsourced and appears to be some sort of advertising, more obvious when one reads the part beginning, "Step 1: Go to www.nodepx.com". dci | TALK 05:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy delete CSD G11 as advertising. CSD A7 is also applicable. --B music ian 05:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] Erin Weir

(Find sources: "Erin Weir" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Not notable Eiad77 (talk) 05:09, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] The political mind of Afghanistan

(Find sources: "The political mind of Afghanistan" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

The article has two references, one of which is a Wikipedia article, and duplicates information present on Wikipedia under far more appopriate article names. dci | TALK 04:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy withdraw. I nominated this for deletion at the same time someone placed a CSD tag on it. dci | TALK 04:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] John Tarrant

(Find sources: "John Tarrant" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Subject appears to fail general notability guidelines - total lack of the independent, reliable references. No evidence that the criteria of WP:AUTHOR met, either. (Declined PROD). ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 04:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 04:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 04:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

question Which has the greater notability: Tarrant, or the Pacific Zen Institute--it seems there might be a possible merge. DGG ( talk ) 06:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Billiards and snooker at the 2011 Southeast Asian Games

(Find sources: "Billiards and snooker at the 2011 Southeast Asian Games" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Pretty much blank. Any information that the reader needs can be found on the main page (2011 Southeast Asian Games) Intoronto1125TalkContributions 04:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the above reasons:

Link to previous AFD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archery at the 2011 Southeast Asian Games. GB fan 04:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Blockparty

(Find sources: "Blockparty" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

No coverage in reliable third-party sources to establish notability. Kelly ^hi! 17:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 03:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Franco Caracciolo

(Find sources: "Franco Caracciolo" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Delete per WP:CREATIVE. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 03:52, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] First planet

(Find sources: "First planet" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

This is not a proper dab page. Perhaps it and most of its eleven brethren (several do have legitimate dab entries) could be consolidated in a single article, but individually, no. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Why isn't it a proper dab page? Serendi ^pod ous 07:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- WP:PTM gives the example of Zoo (disambiguation). It doesn't list every zoo. Planet (disambiguation) doesn't enumerate every object that somebody defines as one. IMO, Fifth planet has two good entries: Fifth planet (hypothetical) and Fifth Planet, with Planet V worthy of being in a See also section. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:36, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  - So how would you clarify this? Serendi ^pod ous 09:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
    - I'm not sure. If you're going for a narrow scope, maybe Geocentric versus heliocentric ordering of planets? For something more ambitious, possibly Ordering of solar system planets, to include mass, density and other properties? The first suggestion seems a bit on the trivial side to me, and I'm not confident that this type of ordering really meshes well with physical properties in the second case. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Delete the whole lot. These are not proper disambiguation pages. "nth planet" is not a topic in itself. We have an article automobile but we don't have articles like red automobile or blue automobile. JIP | Talk 09:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Fairly obviously, third planet should not be deleted, but simply redirected to the existing disambiguation that it does a poor job of duplicating at 3rd planet. I recommend taking that out of the nomination, and speedily redirecting, otherwise this discussion is going to be another bulk-nomination-of-differing-articles disaster. ☺ Uncle G (talk) 09:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Huuh? I didn't nominate third planet. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:35, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  - Yes you did. Uncle G (talk) 08:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
    - I see what happened. I did that before Serendipodous started adding to it, and then somebody removed my nomination without asking. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Removeed and redirected Third planet. Serendi ^pod ous 09:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- No, what you actually did was copy and paste the contents of 3rd planet to Third planet, and then redirect 3rd planet; you didn't "remove" anything (except the {{afd}} template that had been on Third planet), and you didn't redirect Third planet. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  - I don't have the authority to move over redirects, and the word was more formal than the abbreviation. Serendi ^pod ous 20:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Attempting to get off the issue of third planet — Which I said would just muddy the waters here, didn't I? — and back to the articles at hand, I report that I've tried to come up with similarly easy solutions to the remaining disambiguations, but haven't been able to. I had high hopes for Planet 9, but even that doesn't have anything yet. Uncle G (talk) 09:14, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment What is the second planet for Klingons? Jokes aside, these pages do have a potential for expansion]. Locador (talk) 04:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I propose that the primary meaning of the first nine is the heliocentric Solar System model. In other words, redirect "First planet" to Mercury (planet), and "Third planet" to Earth, while moving the existing disambiguation page materials to their "Foo (disambiguation)" titles, and keep the rest. bd2412 T 22:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep I see no harm in keeping them for historical purposes. The fifth planet from the Sun (or Earth) very much depends on how you define a planet. The definition has varied a lot over the last 500 years. -- Kheider (talk) 20:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 03:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 1000mods

(Find sources: "1000mods" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable band, also fails WP:NBAND JayJay^{Talk to me} 04:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 15:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 03:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Iain McLaughlin

(Find sources: "Iain McLaughlin" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Repeatedly proposed for speedy deletion but tag removed with no explanation. Questionable notability and seems to have been written by either the subject or a close representative. Admin response reqd. Steelwool (talk) 16:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 26. Snotbot t • c » 16:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Delete - as not notable. The only source provided is nothing beyond routine coverage (and I doubt it's reliable), and I cannot find anything else. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Comment The article as it stands definitely has problems. It is almost entirely unsourced and, while I am reasonably certain that everything in the article is substantially true, I have not (at least yet) been able to verify most of it from independent reliable sources. However, the one source in the References section of the article is definitely reliable, even though it's probably too slight to establish notability by itself - it's the subject's entry in the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, and the very fact that it exists suggests to me that the subject is likely to be notable (the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction contains far fewer Doctor Who-related articles than does Wikipedia). The subject is also verifiably one of the leading scriptwriters for The Beano.[1] Under the circumstances, I would think it advisable to give an extra week to see if anyone on Wikiproject Comics or Wikiproject Doctor Who (neither of which seem to have been informed of this discussion) can do better on identifying reliable sources than I have. PWilkinson (talk) 21:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 03:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Wairere Boulders

(Find sources: "Wairere Boulders" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

No apparent notability for this nature park, and a search throws up a lot of directory listings rather than significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. There is already an article for the Horeke basalts that are the basis for the park. Step hen 23:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep. My search turns up multiple examples of coverage in reliable sources, suggesting this is a legitimately notable tourist attraction. For example "Northland boulders draw tourists" in TVNZ (2007); "Kaikohe plans tourism future" in Stuff.co.nz (2008); "Rocking round the north" in New Zealand Herald (2009); "Hokianga: Hidden secrets" in New Zealand Herald (2011), and multiple coverage in significant travel guides.[2]. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep. I am actually the owner of Wairere Boulders and could give you hundreds of references. Here just a few that could convince you about the importance of our business to New Zealand. You can open 90% of tourism guides and will find a reference to us. Lonely Planet, Rough Guides.... Bus Tour by Great Sights Paihia to Wairere Boulders [3]. An article written by Elizabeth Light was published in the prestigious magazine North and South [4]. Wairere Boulders on TV NZ Country Calendar. Just google Wairere Boulders [5] Here the link to the TV NZ News 2007 "Northland boulders draw tourists" we saved the movie which was deleted from the TV NZ page TV ONE NEWS --Wairere (talk) 11:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC) — Wairere (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete. WP is not a travelogue or a tourism company directory. It is also a bit SPAMish. A mention at Horeke basalts is sufficient. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Complete mess. This article and Horeke basalts are about very closely related things and there appear to be two WP:COI editors (possibly using socks or anon edits) to further their different business goals. I actually believe that these are probably notable but I'm going to have to !vote merge to Horeke basalts, because of the COI issues. If there are genuine WP:RS, let them accumulate there. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep. Wairere Boulders is similar to a National Park, but on private property. Hence it should have a separate listing like a New_Zealand_national_park. Unfortunately they cannot be listed on the page with NZ National Parks. WP has listed many tourism businesses for instance Waimangu Volcanic Valley, Waitomo Caves, Kelly Tarlton's Underwater World, R. Tucker Thompson. Wairere Boulders is as important as these well established Tourism Operators but much younger. They should not be vindicated. The Horeke basalts have a length of about 30 km and to merge the two sites will confuse issues. I will continue editing Wairere Boulders, so please will someone clean it up to a format acceptable by WP. I am no very familiar with the WP rules. --Not-clue-less (talk) 23:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC) — Not-clue-less (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Keep, the business does appear to have significant coverage in national sources, such as NZ Herald, the Dominion, TVNZ and North & South. It also has coverage in local sources, naturally. Most of this coverage has only just been added to the article.-gadfium 03:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Delete, it appears that all the content written about this business is from the owner and is heavily biased. None of it has supporting references (other than other articles written by the owner). It seems to be a complete mess full of unreliable content. Also the original article Horeke Basalts already covers the area in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopher3895 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC) — Christopher3895 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Comment: I've withdrawn my vote, but stand by my comment that this is a complete mess. There are three apparently completely different websites, none of which list a business name, charity name or personal name on their contact pages (a, b and c). The New Zealand charities and New Zealand companies registers contain no obvious mention of these activities by obvious names (including the personal names mentioned by some of the actors here). Stuartyeates (talk) 08:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
- I understand your confusion. Wairere Adventure Park appears to be a separate business located on the same road as Wairere Boulders, offering a range of tourist services but not focussing primarily on the basalts. The .com site offers information about the basalts but doesn't seem to be selling anything; however there seems to be a rivalry with the Wairere Boulders company. The .co.nz site belongs to the company we're discussing here.-gadfium 09:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Bingo! There is an active trademark application with a date of 31 Jan 2012. Maybe what we're seeing is an attempt to astroturf to support the applicants claim against their rival(s)? Stuartyeates (talk) 09:27, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Clarification! Wairere Bouldersexists for over 10 years already and has put up many road signs and did a lot of PR. Wairere Adventure Park just started 2 years ago. They try to officially register our business name to use our business name Wairere Boulders for their own business. The wairereboulders.com site Area of Wairere Boulders sends customers to their newly established business.
All articles on the Wairere Boulders page can be verified if needed, some of them are transcripts done with the permission of the papers.
Our personal names are on the bottom of the Brochure

--Wairere (talk) 02:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: Relisting debate to generate more clear consensus. Even discounting the single purpose account "keep" !votes, I still feel there is no consensus to delete the article.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 03:45, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETE, WP:CSD#A10. postdlf (talk) 04:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Naruto shippuden episode list

(Find sources: "Naruto shippuden episode list" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Appears to be a list of links to online episodes - or at least, one being formed. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:40, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Comment - I'm guessing this should be redirected to List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (as one user has already attempted), but not until the AfD has closed. -- WikHead (talk) 04:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] Place Bell (Laval)

(Find sources: "Place Bell (Laval)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Delete - I don't think that a proposed arena for a potential minor league hockey team is notable. It isn't even under construction. --MTLskyline (talk) 03:40, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Steve Light

(Find sources: "Steve Light" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Bio page about an author. Quick google search does not seem to turn up anything I can use for reliable sources. Not convinced he is notable. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Strong delete It would have to be entirely re-written even if he was notable JayJay^{Talk to me} 03:41, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Intent Leadership

(Find sources: "Intent Leadership" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Not sure how to frame this. Only link to this is an article about the book that this concept is placed in. Only seems to define the concept at best, in any event. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:37, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Chucky vs. Leprechaun

(Find sources: "Chucky vs. Leprechaun" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

This seems to be speculation on another horror crossover film. At this point the project is in discussion according to the sources given - though the only sources given are a Wikia page and a forum post thread from a few years back, none of which are really reliable. No entry on IMDB. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn seems I was wrong. Nice work on the improvements. NAC. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Fall out nuka break

(Find sources: "Fall out nuka break" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Appears to be the plotline to a story, but I'm not seeing any attachment to any particular series, genre, or media. I don't feel I can {{db-nocontext}} this on account that this has some context. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep It's referring to this, I believe, a popular fan-made live-action series set in the Fallout video game universe. Surprisingly, it does appear to have a fair amount of news coverage, including this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this, to name a few. The article definitely needs to be rewritten from the ground up though. Silver seren^C 03:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

I've gone and completely rewritten the article, with refs. Silver seren^C 05:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Goddamn! Great work! I'm withdrawing this one. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[edit] SFL 1

(Find sources: "SFL 1" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Here we go again, no indication that this MMA event is going to be notable, right now it is promotional and sourced to routine coverage. (fails WP:EVENT) Mt king ^(edits) 03:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep highly notable, meets GNG due to high number of independent articles for event, on par with similar promotion's events ONE Fighting Championship BigzMMA (talk) 05:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

But they are the just routine coverage any sports event gets. To highlight the point take for example a regular season home game for any NFL team , it will get vastly more coverage than this event will,it would have enough coverage to pass WP:GNG, but we don't have an article, because the coverage is routine. It is the same here, how is this event (which as not happened) going to be of historical and encyclopaedic significance ? Mt king ^(edits) 05:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Economic stratification

(Find sources: "Economic stratification" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

It has had no souces since 2009 which suggests it is not important enough to improve or is unverifiable. Perhaps merge the information if sources are found otherwise it should be deleted Brad7777 (talk) 02:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep. Lack of sources is not a reason for deletion, and the deletion rationale does not appear to show evidence of "thorough attempts to find reliable sources" as required by WP:DEL#REASON. A trivial google scholar search turns up thousands of potential sources. These seem to establish notability, and the article could in principle (if necessary) be rewritten from any number of such sources. Sławomir Biały (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep per Sławomir Biały. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 03:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep or maybe redirect, as this seems like a topic that would have already been covered elsewhere, but I don't see a good redirect location.AerobicFox (talk) 03:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Drunkard's search

(Find sources: "Drunkard's search" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

I think this article will struggle to improve from its current 3 lines of text Brad7777 (talk) 02:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep. Over a hundred google scholar hits establish notability. Sławomir Biały (talk) 03:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep Click the handy link already supplied and page a bit. No question. EEng (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Downward social comparison

(Find sources: "Downward social comparison" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

It consits of one line, even though it is atleast 4 years old. The information could probably be merged somewhere. Theres no point having an article for what appears to be a dictionary entry. Brad7777 (talk) 02:08, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Delete - Already covered (in more detail) by social comparison theory. DoctorKubla (talk) 09:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Yogoothies

(Find sources: "Yogoothies" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Speedy was declined, and while English language sources may be an issue, I can find no evidence this company is notable or meets WP:CORP/WP:ORG. Disclosure, I just deleted the vast majority of the article but it was a) a copyvio and b) not in English so I don't think that has an impact on the AFD. Just mentioning before it comes up. StarM 01:11, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Factor theorem

(Find sources: "Factor theorem" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

No addition of any sources since the tag in 2009 Brad7777 (talk) 01:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. --Lambiam 02:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep. A well-known and important theorem in basic algebra. Added a source. Sławomir Biały (talk) 03:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep. Using the Find sources it is easy to verify that this theorem is covered by plenty of elementary textbooks. --Lambiam 03:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
keep, but add some ref-s. this is the first link I saw, but I guess any book in elementary algebra would be even better. Sasha (talk) 05:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy Keep. Total failure of WP:BEFORE. WP:N is based on sources that exist, not sources in the article. -- 202.124.72.213 (talk) 08:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep, if only on philosophical grounds. --Matt Westwood 09:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Obi Agbogidi Olo-Ome Alfred Okolie 1

(Find sources: "Obi Agbogidi Olo-Ome Alfred Okolie 1" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable person JayJay^{Talk to me} 00:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Harold van der Heijden

Delete - article was obviously started by the person the article is about User:Hhstudy [6] to promote his commercial product. JunoBeach (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep Described as "world's leading authority in endgame studies" by British Chess Magazine [7]. Article is unsourced, pov puffery and needs total rewrite from neutral viewpoint, but the subject seems notable. A lot of non-English sources. Tigerboy1966 01:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Why is this within another DR? FunkMonk (talk) 07:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-Alawite Sentiment in the 2011-2012 Syrian Uprising

(Find sources: "Anti-Alawite Sentiment in the 2011-2012 Syrian Uprising" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

This is a clear and obvious WP:POVFORK from Sectarianism in the 2011–2012 Syrian uprising. I suspect the user who originally created the page, User:Grimso5, may be a sock of User:ChronicalUsual, who was blocked for disruptive editing on Syria content before, and I am all but certain that the user who recreated this page after its content was moved to the "Sectarianism" page, User:FavorLaw, is a sock of ChronicalUsual. The article name is blatantly POV; all of this content is already either included in the "Sectarianism" article or it could easily be incorporated there. Both editors' purpose in creating and then recreating this page (whether they are separate individuals or not) appears to be to promote an anti-Syrian opposition POV. I am not opposed to include verifiable information no matter who it looks bad for, but this doesn't need to be a separate page, it was already moved to a less POV title, and this is a clear case of POV forking, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia. Kudzu1 (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Merge rather than delete. There is nothing wrong with the information. FunkMonk (talk) 23:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No, there isn't. That's why I don't have a problem with almost all of it being present, almost verbatim, on the Sectarianism page. -Kudzu1 (talk) 23:40, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep 1) You are paranoid with your baseless accusations. 2) This is not a fork from the sectarianism page as the sectarianism page has been created AFTER the page you are nominating for deletion. This is a massive logic failure from your part 3) If anything it is the Sectarianism page which is the fork created by user:Sopher99 who already tried to merge , redirect and speedy delete the nominated page because he did not like the content. You are following his path --FavorLaw (talk) 23:42, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Don't worry, the info will be kept. FunkMonk (talk) 23:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The content is all on the Sectarianism page. That wasn't a fork, it was a move to a less POV title. This is a fork. -Kudzu1 (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

It was a fork. A fork of the Syrian Uprising page to begin. Sopher99 created a new page, took all the content from a section of the Syrian Uprising page and made a redirect for the nominated page, erasing all the content of the page. I did not know how to revert such a move, which was done without any discussion so copying back has messed up the chronology. But it went like that. After that, Sopher99 has tried to merge and speedy delete the page he had already tried to erase with its content. Then someone else copied the content of the nominated page and pasted it directly on the Sectarianism page, without discussion too. --FavorLaw (talk) 00:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

So the content has already been merged, as it should have been, and this page can be deleted. -Kudzu1 (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

No need to delete, just redirect it. FunkMonk (talk) 00:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

A merge has to be discussed before it happen. It was not the case and some people, including me, opposed the merge. --FavorLaw (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Of course. I have no problem with restoring this page to being a redirect to the original article. -Kudzu1 (talk) 01:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep - Because the Alawite minority holds power in Syria, Alawites form a special and obvious target for negative sentiment, violence and lynching by those opposed to the current government. Their special position of minority-but-governing makes them a specific case that should not be tucked away into a general article on sectarianism. - TaalVerbeteraar (talk) 10:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

We don't have a problem with article length. There's no reason that information can't be covered on the same page where treatment of Christians and Sunni Muslims is. -Kudzu1 (talk) 18:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Exactly. We're not at 50 kb yet, no need to split. FunkMonk (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Important note - User:FavorLaw has been blocked and tagged as a sockpuppet of the disruptive editor User:ChronicalUsual. -Kudzu1 (talk) 19:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Merge to Sectarianism in the 2011–2012 Syrian uprising, same topic. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 07:26, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Lord Huron

(Find sources: "Lord Huron" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Fails WP:BAND. While this visual arts major currently residing in Los Angeles may become notable in the future, it appears too early for a Wikipedia article as I am unable to locate significant reliable source coverage to establish notability. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Portfolio investment

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTDIC. Article has existed for years with no improvement except it doesn't know if it's a foreign portfolio investment or a generic portfolio investment. Bbb23 (talk) 01:22, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

And what effort have you put in to determining whether this stub is incapable of expansion? Per deletion policy, we only delete stubs if they cannot be expanded, not simply because they haven't yet been. When you see a stub, try to expand it as your first resort. At AFD, you must be able to demonstrate that you've tried to find sources for expansion and failed. It's fairly clear from even a minimal and cursory attempt to find out what the literature on portfolio investments is that your first thought has been to come to AFD with no attempt to actually write the encyclopaedia first. If the article doesn't explain things, then fix it so that it does in accordance with the copious literature on the subject. You're meant to be a Wikipedia writer. So write! Don't be yourself a part of the no-editors-have-done-anything problem.
- Pietersz, Graeme. "Portfolio investment". Money Terms. http://moneyterms.co.uk/portfolio-investment/.
- Sornarajah, M. (2010). "Bilateral investment treaties". The International Law on Foreign Investment (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 196–197. ISBN 9780521747653.
- Brawley, Mark Randal (2005). "The Politics of International Investment". Power, money, and trade: decisions that shape global economic relations. University of Toronto Press. pp. 180–182. ISBN 9781551116839.
- Cherunilam, Francis (2007). "International Investment and Finance". International business: text and cases (4th ed.). PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. pp. 322–323. ISBN 9788120330962.
Uncle G (talk) 10:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- You've done a wonderful job of updating the article after your rant. It looks so much less like garbage now than it did when I nominated it.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  - You are the one who wants article written right now, to your arbitrary schedule, not us. You are the one who claims to write in the area of legal topics. You are the editor who is the problem. Here you are still doing nothing whilst — ironically — complaining that nothing has been done. And this in the face of people who have even put in the grunt work and handed sources to you on a platter, when you did nothing at all to find sources, even when you clearly knew what the topic was and what could be written. {{sofixit}} applies. Stop being part of the problem. You are being exactly the very makes-zero-effort timewaster, who does nothing but tag articles for deletion rather than write, that you are purporting to decry. Buck your ideas up. You're meant to be a writer. Wikipedia needs writers. What it doesn't need are people who do what you are doing: who see things that they know about, make zero effort to write or even research the subject, and nominate valid stubs for deletion on the grounds that they themselves have made zero effort. Wikipedia doesn't need people who make zero effort themselves but who nonetheless try to bully other volunteers into doing everything for them according to an arbitrary schedule that they've plucked from thin air. Uncle G (talk) 08:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

LOL, AfD is such a collegial place. Where did I "claim" to write about legal topics? How do you define "arbitrary schedule"? If 4 years isn't enough for you, how many is? 6? 8? 300? Don't tell me what Wikipedia "needs" - you haven't a clue, only your highly inflated opinion that you know best.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep. Obviously notable, encyclopedic term. Nothing about the stub suggests it cannot be expanded through normal editing. ^Bongo_matic 14:24, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Heh, the "article" has existed since 2008 and been tagged since 2009, and here we are, waiting for it to be "expanded through normal editing".--Bbb23 (talk) 00:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
  - Heh². There's an "argument to avoid" for this particular line of specious reasoning at WP:NOEFFORT. ^Bongo_matic 02:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Ain Soph (disambiguation)

(Find sources: "Ain Soph (disambiguation)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Fails MOS:DABENTRY. Bbb23 (talk) 02:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep - it distinguishes between two articles you might want to find if you looked up "Ain Soph" (as I did just before creating the dab). You've failed to detail what it fails in the style guideline, and failing a style guideline is a reason for editing, not deletion - David Gerard (talk) 08:36, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- And I just found another reasonably disambiguable article named after the concept "ain soph", in a few seconds you failed to take before making a deletion nomination. This nomination seems to demonstrate unfortunately poor attention to detail - David Gerard (talk) 08:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Comment. The disambig violated many rules (I won't detail them all here because I'm sure editors can read the guidelines). However, based on the addition of a second actual article (before there was only one article and one redlink), and my edits to conform the page to guidelines (I removed the description and the redlink), I'll withdraw the nom.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:08, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Nokia 1680 classic

(Find sources: "Nokia 1680 classic" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Short, non-notable phone that is unlikely to expand. JayJay^{Talk to me} 02:59, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Article definitely needs more sources once the sources are located and added, I don't see any reason why it should be deleted. We can't delete stubs simply because it's 'unlikely' to expand. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 03:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Above the City

(Find sources: "Above the City" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable fails WP:NALBUMS JayJay^{Talk to me} 03:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment. Well, there's a review here which is considered reliable by WP:Wikiproject Albums, as its a staff review. I'm not finding anything else in online sources; perhaps someone else can to help get this to meet WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. Gongshow ^Talk 08:13, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Delete - No evidence of independent notability. A single review from an underground music website is nowhere near meeting general notability guidelines. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 10:30, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
I agree that the single source is not enough; I was hopeful that since one professional source from this list was found, then additional coverage might surface. However, there just doesn't appear to be any, so I support deletion. Gongshow ^Talk 18:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 1,000 Grams

(Find sources: "1,000 Grams" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable mixtape with one source that I'm not sure is reliable. JayJay^{Talk to me} 03:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep. There appears to be enough significant coverage (e.g., [8][9][10][11]) to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. Gongshow ^Talk 08:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep - There is no indication that the article fails WP:GNG. Especially after the sources Gongshow provided. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 03:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Colin Ingram (producer)

(Find sources: "Colin Ingram (producer)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable producer JayJay^{Talk to me} 03:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Arthur Kern

(Find sources: "Arthur Kern" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Can't find anything suggesting the topic would meet WP:GNG or WP:NPEOPLE CharlieEchoTango (contact) 10:20, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Culture of Gobichettipalayam

(Find sources: "Culture of Gobichettipalayam" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Despite my advice to merge this poorly sourced info into the main article and copyedit/condense and source it this editor insisted on dumping this material into new articles without solving the problem itself. A small city in India does not need articles on its culture and economy and is likely to be a magnet for further poor edits.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete, or at least merge. Some of it is interesting and potentially useful but this doesn't really deserve its own article. Night Ranger (talk) 15:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Economy of Gobichettipalayam

(Find sources: "Economy of Gobichettipalayam" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Despite my advice to merge this unsourced info into the main article and copyedit and source it this editor insisted on dumping this material into new articles without solving the problem itself.. A small city in India does not need articles on its Economy and Culture.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment - Since the Gobichettipalayam article is only 23kB size these are unnecessary content forks. This is a town of only 60000 population, so better keep everything in the main article. I think you should have made a group nomination for this. MakeSense64 (talk) 21:33, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete and place an information from the article which is (a) sufficiently relevant and (b) can be supported by actual WP:RS references into the Gobichettipalayam article where it belongs. AllyD (talk) 20:59, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Transport in Gobichettipalayam

(Find sources: "Transport in Gobichettipalayam" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Despite my advice to merge this unsourced info into the main article and copyedit and source it this editor insisted on dumping this material into new articles without solving the problem itself.. A small city in India does not need articles on its Economy Transport and Culture.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Media in Gobichettipalayam

(Find sources: "Media in Gobichettipalayam" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Despite my advice to merge this unsourced info into the main article and copyedit and source it this editor insisted on dumping this material into new articles without solving the problem itself.. A small city in India does not need articles on such topics when they cam be adequately summarised in the main article.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Delete. Strange article, seems to be about media available in this location, which is not an appropriate topic. Tigerboy1966 02:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Holcombe Hockey Club

(Find sources: "Holcombe Hockey Club" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Deleted as PROD and re-created; does not meet WP:GNG or the notability guidelines for sport clubs. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 19:47, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Weak Delete - Although I can find some mentions in Google News, most of them are related directly to the article's topic. I'm not sure how to call this one exactly.

[edit] Lana Williams

(Find sources: "Lana Williams" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

The subject fails both the general notability guideline and the specific guideline for entertainers. She was involved in one notable event: becoming runner up in the second series of the BBC1 show Strictly Dance Fever. This is adequately covered in the Strictly Dance Fever article. Google books and Google news archive searches yield nothing relevant. There are non-independent sources. Dancerspro.com has a page about her that includes a list of events she has taken part in, frequently as a troupe member or assistant choreographer. Their notability appears dubious. Swingxtreme also has a page about her, but it is not independent as she works for this company. Stfg (talk) 20:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Music_Candy

(Find sources: "Music_Candy" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

This article is about a company whose only possibly notability is one theme of one tv show in the UK. This does not meet any of the music notability requirements, particularly WP:COMPOSER. I did a search on the company and could not find any information at all on them outside their own website. Let me know if I am missing something. Gofigure41 21:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 1 For 3

(Find sources: "1 For 3" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable tv show, no references JayJay^{Talk to me} 22:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete - It seems these past weeks, users such as Bertrand101 have been starting unsourced Filipino TV programs articles. I couldn't find anything mentioning this TV show, no news articles or television guides. SwisterTwister talk 06:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep. This one is not a hoax. Let's see if I can salvage something later... –H T D 06:19, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep as a real Philippine TV series. There are now sources as of writing. I'll try to add some of mine as well.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:42, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Red (A.S. RED)

(Find sources: "Red (A.S. RED)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Unsourced affair that can be merged with After School (band). A.S. RED, sub unit of South Korean girl group After School Night of the Big Wind _talk 22:34, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment - Although there's no sources, the article asserts that it charted. Seems like that would make it likely to pass music notability standards, and probably receive coverage as well, right? Sergecross73 msg me 13:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Merge as suggested. Per WP:NSONG, "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 10:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Collegium ramazzini

(Find sources: "Collegium ramazzini" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable academy. Tinton5 (talk) 22:36, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete Non-notable, and unreferenced.
Keep: With 76 Google News hits [12] and four hundred and thirty-five Google Scholar hits [13], I can only conclude that the nom and the other Delete proponent completely blew off WP:BEFORE. The proper response for a lack of adequate sourcing is to see if the article can be sourced, not a knee-jerk AfD. Ravenswing 00:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

There are actually 2 results for Google News. However, the Google Scholar links are not bad to work with. Thank you for providing those. Tinton5 (talk) 03:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Reply: I'm unsure what methodology you're using to view News hits, but there are articles from the Charlestown News & Courier, the New York Times, the Canadian Medical Association Journal, the Pittsburgh Press, the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Meriden Record-Journal, news-medical.net, and so on and so forth; a few more than two. Ravenswing 08:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Well the link you provided, only 2 come up for some reason. Thanks though for trying. Tinton5 (talk) 22:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Possibly because I use Google using their secure server, and likely you don't. Nothing, however, stops you from going to Google News' advanced search option, typing in "Collegium Ramazzini" and observing the results ... the sort of minimal effort WP:BEFORE enjoins us to undertake in any event before filing an AfD. Ravenswing 01:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Took your advice, Raven, however, very few of the results that I searched give information as to why this academy is important. Many just give brief mentions about said establishment. Tinton5 (talk) 03:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

No doubt. Of course, only two references which discuss the subject in detail are sufficient to meet the GNG. Ravenswing 17:57, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I am the author, and I will find some additional external references tonight. Gofigure41 03:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gofigure41 (talk • contribs)

Okay, I have added beaucoup additional external links to peer-reviewed scientific publications and editorials. I have also added numerous recent announcements for the election of international scientists to the board including doctors from Columbia University, Boston University, India and Italy. There are many more that I will keep adding. Does this now qualify to get the AfD removed? I will work next to get links to the popular press stories as well, but the internal scientific links alone seem to me to make this work more than sufficiently notable to avoid deletion. Thanks, Gofigure41 04:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gofigure41 (talk • contribs)

Last thing for today, added more external and internal links, including one about the 1995 Washington DC Symposia as described in the peer-reviewed scientific publication, Environmental health Sciences. Lots more to add, but hopefully this gets this page off the AdF.Gofigure41 05:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gofigure41 (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 1000Fryd

(Find sources: "1000Fryd" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notalbe building, can't seem to find references to suggest notability JayJay^{Talk to me} 22:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment From all the concerts by famous talent, and it being mentioned in a novel, one might expect the sort of coverage which would contribute to satisfying WP:N. Are there any sources in Danish? Edison (talk) 03:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 20 Wheels to Memphis

(Find sources: "20 Wheels to Memphis" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable film, also can't find any references to suggest notability JayJay^{Talk to me} 22:58, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Delete - I can find mentions from all the usual ones ([14] [15] etc.) but nothing really to warrant a keep. Nothing from Google News and Books. The article also strays away by talking too much of its soundtrack. All of its MoS problems should seal this article's fate. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 03:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 24 (song)

(Find sources: "24 (song)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Non-notable song with no references JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Jane Roskams

(Find sources: "Jane Roskams" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Jane Roskams does not reach the notability guidelines for academics. Without going through each of them independently, she does not hold a prestigious academic award or title, and no independent reliable sources exist demonstrating that she has made a significant impact in her field of research.

[edit] Files

[edit] Possibly unfree files

[edit] March 4

[edit] File:Satyapal Anand Portrait.jpg

File:Satyapal Anand Portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious own work. Looks like a painting of some kind. Stefan2 (talk) 00:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:First Avenue-7th St Entry.jpg

File:First Avenue-7th St Entry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Deleted on Commons[16] because the Flickr sourcing was inadequate; it is indeed inadequate. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:40, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep. Hi, Magog the Ogre. Why was this deleted on commons? Ms. Mingo, the photographer, was username SunFlowery on Flickr. She changed all of her licenses after I uploaded them. I think I may have written to her a hundred times thanking her for her generous license. (Try looking her up in Google: "amy mingo inurl:wikimedia.org"). I'm very sorry she changed her mind and went pro or something, but the licenses, which cannot be changed after FlickreviewR verifies them, stand. Thank you. Examples below. -SusanLesch (talk) 05:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Lake Calhoun-skyline-Minneapolis-2006-10-01.jpg File:Farmers market-St Paul-2006-08-12.jpg File:Tugboat-ship-Duluth-20060528.jpg File:Giant Slide-Minnesota State Fair.jpg File:Agriculture Building-Minnesota.jpg File:Cheese curds-Minnesota.jpg File:Showing Holstein cow-Minnesota.jpg

That's good enough for me; I was just trying to synchronize the decision across Wikipedia and Commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Roadrunner Logo.png

File:Roadrunner Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

I really doubt Roadrunner has released their logo under a CC license. Eeekster (talk) 04:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Files for deletion

[edit] March 4

[edit] File:Dan Schneider.jpg

Non-free photo of a person who is still alive (see WP:NFC#UUI §1). Stefan2 (talk) 00:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Engin Akyurek, Turkish Actor.jpg

Non-free photo of someone who still appears to be alive. Stefan2 (talk) 00:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Stefan:

I may have miscategorized this picture, as I didn't know how to load it correctly, and to categorize it. The picture is of someone who is alive, but was sent to me by the production company, Ay Yapim, for which Engin Akyurek works. The picture was to be uploaded into the Wiki file, "Engin Akyurek" as it is missing an image. I looked at the other categorizations for images, and thought this would be the best choice; if I should categorize it in another way, please let me know, and I will do my best to reload it. Alternatively, if I can have an administrator load it correctly, that would be fantastic. The picture was sent to me directly by the production company, with the understanding that it be used in Wikipedia.

Thank you.

Infuzein (talk) 01:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Mercurybattery2.PNG

Image is inaccurate and of no encyclopediac value Wtshymanski (talk) 01:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Golgo 13 - ss 3.gif

Fails NFCC #8 - it's a random copyvio cutscene from a game, in fullres, that is quite adequately described by the (overwrought and obsessive, as is typical for anime and videogames) article text. 108.45.112.39 (talk) 03:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Delete not a reduced resolution video since the NES native resolution is 256x224. ☮Soap☮ 04:11, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Golgo 13 - ss 4.gif

Fails NFCC #8 - it's a random copyvio cutscene from a game, in fullres, that is quite adequately described by the (overwrought and obsessive, as is typical for anime and videogames) article text. 108.45.112.39 (talk) 03:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Delete not a reduced resolution video since the NES native resolution is 256x224. ☮Soap☮ 04:11, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Categories

[edit] March 4

[edit] NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit] Category:Rest of the World cricket tours

Propose renaming Category:Rest of the World cricket tours to Category:International cricket tours of the Rest of the World

Nominator's rationale: Every sister category uses the "International cricket tours of FOO" format. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 09:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Science organizations by type of organization

Propose renaming Category:Science organizations by type of organization to Category:Types of science organizations

Nominator's rationale: Rename. Different name for the same expected subcategories... Brad7777 (talk) 09:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Peter Jackson and du Maurier Classic

Propose renaming Category:Peter Jackson and du Maurier Classic to Category:Canadian Women's Open

Nominator's rationale: Peter Jackson Classic and du Maurier Classic are former names of the event, and therefore events shouldn't categorised after them. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 08:46, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Amusement rides with virtual queues

Nominator's rationale: Delete. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. If the contained material is somehow encyclopedic, it could be listified. Also the main article on virtual queues is not about this topic and only mentions it in passing. This is not defining for the associated rides. It is a convince for part attendees. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Redirects

[edit] March 4

[edit] Templates

[edit] March 4

[edit] Template:Filet-O-Fish

While I am not questioning the good faith of the creator of this template, I think it is inappropriate and excessively promotional to have a WikiAward that promotes a specific trademarked product by a specific company. –Grondemar 02:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Keep: There are dozens of awards that use trademarks in Wikipedia. Since they are almost exclusively used in userspace, they are perfectly acceptable when used with discretion. To institute a policy which prohibits awards using trademarks would be draconian. Some awards associated with trademarks found here [17] include: Steiner Beer, NASCAR, Wuerzburger Hofbraue, Ballantine's Finest whiskey, Guinness, Mobil oil. Who hasn't spent hours wikilawyering at ANI just to find an icecold Guiness waiting for them on their talkpage! Ah the joy! We also have {{Hershey Bar}}. This is a fun template that helps spread Wikilove. – Lionel ^(talk) 03:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete this looks like an endorsement of the McDonald's Filet-o-Fish by Wikipedia, so is overly promotional. Could also be construed as an advertisement. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 05:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

If we were talking about article space that would be one thing. Can you cite a policy which prohibits trademarks in user space? – Lionel ^(talk) 05:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Template:2011 Southeastern Conference football navbox

I am nominating this navbox, along with all similar yearly football conference articles (will add the full list shortly) as I do not believe it serves as a useful tool for navigation. Currently this type of navbox is used on two different types of articles: individual team season articles and bowl game articles.

For individual team season articles, the template is redundant to links contained within the body of the articles. Virtually every one of these articles will have a standings table similar to the one in 2011 Southeastern Conference football season that links to every single conference team season article. With that in place there is nothing gained by placing the same links in a navbox at the bottom of the page.
For bowl game articles, the navbox is redundant to the bowl game season navboxes, which list every bowl game placed by every team in a single season. Additionally, very few users navigate through bowl game articles by conference per year. By team or by individual game is much more common; that is why we have those navboxes. –Grondemar 01:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Full list of nominated templates for deletion:

Delete all I agree. These are navbox overkill. Jweiss11 (talk) 02:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete all Way too specific for navbox. They do not aid the reader is navigating through anything--GrapedApe (talk) 06:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep I don't understand the advertising implications. E.g., The first one I looked at was Template:2012 Big Ten Conference football navbox. I see no logo or promotion. Also, there is a third type of article where this template is useful: Conference Championship games.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Stub types

Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2012/March/4

[edit] Miscellany (WikiProjects, user pages, etc.)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#2012-03-04

[edit] Deletion review

[edit] 4 March 2012

[edit] Laura Massey

Laura Massey http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Massey has had three deletion reviews all of which have resulted in her page being kept deleted. I have two other sources that were not brought up in the last deletion review for some reason that I would like you to consider.

"Geek of the Week: Laura Massey, Xbox software engineer" http://www.geekwire.com/2011/geek-week-laura-massey-xbox-software-engineer
"An Interview With Nerd Trivia Creator Laura Massey" http://bnbgaming.com/2011/05/17/an-interview-with-nerd-trivia-creator-laura-massey

I'm not exactly sure what is needed to get her page back, but she is a growing public figure at Microsoft and is now a Project Manager leading "Xbox Incubation". Google and Bing results for her have increased to 1,270,000 and 11,200,000 respectively. She has created her own game named NerdTrivia http://nerdtrivia.net/ which has thousands (7,074) players and has raised press coverage in the above links.

I would also like to add to this discussion per her former deletion reviews links which by themselves were too weak to overcome the AFD, but perhaps if reviewed together might make for a stronger case for her to meet the WP:N criteria.

"NerdTrivia Brings Geeky Pub Quizzes to Twitter" http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/01/nerdtrivia-twitter-game/
"CNET TV E3 2010: Microsoft Kinect for Xbox 360" Laura Massey appears at 02:03 http://cnettv.cnet.com/e3-2010-microsoft-kinect-xbox-360/9742-1_53-50088986.htmln
"Microsoft E3 Press Conference Details" http://www.worldofmeh.com/2010/06/microsoft-e3-press-conference-details/
"E3 2010: Microsoft Press Conference" http://www.slowdown.vg/2010/06/17/e3-2010-microsoft-press-conference/
"Microsoft Kinects with Dallas from E3" http://www.leadershell.com/2010/06/14/microsoft-kinects-with-dallas-from-e3/

She seems to have done some very notable things in public in and out of her work at Microsoft. Bawitdaba1337 (talk) 03:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Endorse again. Last DRV was just a month ago, and the supposed "new" evidence is just more of the same, blogs and irrelevant stuff like Google hits... while we're on that topic, while it's true Laura Massey without quotes gets plenty of hits, *with* quotes it has just 589 unique hits, and most of those are unrelated folks who just happen to share that fairly common name. On that last page, for example, I see a doctor, a cyclist, and a bookseller, among others. For comparison's sake, my name gets 501 unique results, and I'm not famous at all. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:41, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Centralized discussion

Proposals	Discussions	Recurring proposals
An RfC on the Arbitration Committee and how to deal with good-editing sockpuppets. RfC on the conflict of interest guideline, as requested by the Arbitration Committee. RfC on adding a more prominent link to Special:MyContributions for IP editors RfC about allowing watchlisting of user contributions Binding community discussion on the Abortion article titles, as requested by the Arbitration Committee. RfC on the proposed cessation of selective delete (other than history merge fixes) and resulting changes to deletion policies, including the removal of a Revision Deletion criterion. Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.
archive · talk · edit · history · watch

Feb	MAR	Apr
	04
2011	2012	2013

Wikipedia:XfD today

Contents

[edit] Speedy deletion candidates

[edit] Articles

[edit] Stained glass windows of St Pauls, Clifton

[edit] All-time Albanian Superliga table

[edit] Smiley (2012 film)

[edit] Inspector General Gerald Walpin firing controversy

[edit] Li Huang (mathematician)

[edit] Chinese mathematicians rankings

[edit] Southside Royal Crips

[edit] Alkovi

[edit] Payday monsanto

[edit] Shrisudharshannathji

[edit] List of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon Episodes

[edit] Wallace C. Piotrowski

[edit] Nodepx

[edit] Erin Weir

[edit] The political mind of Afghanistan

[edit] John Tarrant

[edit] Billiards and snooker at the 2011 Southeast Asian Games

[edit] Blockparty

[edit] Franco Caracciolo

[edit] First planet

[edit] 1000mods

[edit] Iain McLaughlin

[edit] Wairere Boulders

[edit] Naruto shippuden episode list

[edit] Place Bell (Laval)

[edit] Steve Light

[edit] Intent Leadership

[edit] Chucky vs. Leprechaun

[edit] Fall out nuka break

[edit] SFL 1

[edit] Economic stratification

[edit] Drunkard's search

[edit] Downward social comparison

[edit] Yogoothies

[edit] Factor theorem

[edit] Obi Agbogidi Olo-Ome Alfred Okolie 1

[edit] Harold van der Heijden

[edit] Anti-Alawite Sentiment in the 2011-2012 Syrian Uprising

[edit] Lord Huron

[edit] Portfolio investment

[edit] Ain Soph (disambiguation)

[edit] Nokia 1680 classic

[edit] Above the City

[edit] 1,000 Grams

[edit] Colin Ingram (producer)

[edit] Arthur Kern

[edit] Culture of Gobichettipalayam

[edit] Economy of Gobichettipalayam

[edit] Transport in Gobichettipalayam

[edit] Media in Gobichettipalayam

[edit] Holcombe Hockey Club

[edit] Lana Williams

[edit] Music_Candy

[edit] 1 For 3

[edit] Red (A.S. RED)

[edit] Collegium ramazzini

[edit] 1000Fryd

[edit] 20 Wheels to Memphis

[edit] 24 (song)

[edit] Jane Roskams

[edit] Files

[edit] Possibly unfree files

[edit] March 4

[edit] File:Satyapal Anand Portrait.jpg

[edit] File:First Avenue-7th St Entry.jpg

[edit] File:Roadrunner Logo.png

[edit] Files for deletion

[edit] March 4

[edit] File:Dan Schneider.jpg

[edit] File:Engin Akyurek, Turkish Actor.jpg

[edit] File:Mercurybattery2.PNG

[edit] File:Golgo 13 - ss 3.gif

[edit] File:Golgo 13 - ss 4.gif

[edit] Categories

[edit] March 4

[edit] NEW NOMINATIONS