World Press Freedom Index
Index 2026
31/ 180
Score : 74.77
Political indicator
35
65.89
Economic indicator
33
59.92
Legal indicator
33
77.60
Social indicator
18
81.51
Security indicator
50
88.92
Index 2025
35/ 180
Score : 73.36
Political indicator
39
63.70
Economic indicator
36
56.90
Legal indicator
35
78.18
Social indicator
22
81.10
Security indicator
59
86.90

Moldova’s media landscape is polarised between pro-Russian and pro-Western camps, but the control exerted by oligarchs and political leaders over editorial positions has decreased in recent years.

Media landscape

Like the country itself, the media landscape is polarised and marked by the influence of Ilan Shor, a pro-Kremlin oligarch convicted of fraud and money laundering in Moldova and wanted internationally. The media empire built in recent years by companies linked to Shor has been weakened by the suspension of the licences of six channels, including TV6 and Orizont TV, in December 2022 and November 2023. The licences of four other channels linked to Vladimir Plahotniuc — an oligarch and former leader of the Democratic Party of Moldova who is currently in custody under corruption-related charges — were also suspended in November 2023. The content of some of these media outlets has migrated online to their websites and social media.

Political context

While some independent media dare to cover subjects that embarrass the authorities, many limit themselves to following the agenda of the national administration. Most media outlets owned by politicians follow the agenda of their political parties. After December 2023, when the state of emergency imposed due to Russia’s full-scale invasion of neighbouring Ukraine was lifted, the authorities amended legal provisions that allowed for the suspension of several television channels without sufficient transparency in the decision-making process. Measures taken by the Audiovisual Council have tightened control over disinformation and hate speech, and have weakened media outlets that broadcast propaganda content produced in Russia.

Legal framework

Freedom of the press and the right to information are guaranteed by law, and best practices are encouraged by a journalistic code of ethics. The legal framework has been revised and aligned with European standards, enabling public broadcasters to operate with greater institutional autonomy and reduced political interference. But access to information is sometimes undermined, and arbitrary defamation lawsuits are frequent. The legal framework established at the end of 2023, which seeks to block channels whose licences were suspended during the state of emergency, is an area of concern.

Economic context

Faced with a difficult economic environment and weakened by the collapse of the advertising market due to the war in Ukraine, independent media outlets lack resources and experience financial difficulties. As a result, they struggle to recruit qualified staff capable of providing quality work, and many seek financial support from foreign donors.

Sociocultural context

While the socio-cultural environment rarely prevents journalists from doing their jobs, some topics, such as the war waged by Russia in Ukraine, are sensitive. Covering these topics can lead to self-censorship, as well as to disparagement of media on ethnic, religious or gender-based grounds.

Safety

Journalists can be the target of insults and intimidation by politicians. Their supporters sometimes resort to cyber-harassment against reporters deemed hostile to their ideas. Journalists’ access to Transnistria, a separatist eastern province supported by Russia, is subject to special accreditation.

Abuses in real time in Moldova

Killed since 1st January 2026
0 journalists
0 media workers
0
Detained as of today
0 journalists
0 media workers
0
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.