This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Save citation to file

Add to Collections

Name must be less than 100 characters
Unable to load your collection due to an error
Please try again

Add to My Bibliography

Unable to load your delegates due to an error
Please try again

Your saved search

Would you like email updates of new search results?
Saved Search Alert Radio Buttons
()

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

. 2023 Oct;622(7981):101-106.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06562-y. Epub 2023 Sep 27.

Protected areas slow declines unevenly across the tetrapod tree of life

Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Working Land and Seascapes, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA. Nowakowskia@si.edu.
  • 2 Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA. Nowakowskia@si.edu.
  • 3 Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA. Nowakowskia@si.edu.
  • 4 John Carroll University, University Heights, OH, USA.
  • 5 Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
  • 6 Department of Biology, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX, USA.
  • 7 Working Land and Seascapes, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
  • 8 Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.
  • 9 Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
  • 10 Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA.
  • 11 Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • 12 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.

Protected areas slow declines unevenly across the tetrapod tree of life

A Justin Nowakowski et al. Nature. 2023 Oct.
. 2023 Oct;622(7981):101-106.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06562-y. Epub 2023 Sep 27.

Affiliations

  • 1 Working Land and Seascapes, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA. Nowakowskia@si.edu.
  • 2 Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, USA. Nowakowskia@si.edu.
  • 3 Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA. Nowakowskia@si.edu.
  • 4 John Carroll University, University Heights, OH, USA.
  • 5 Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
  • 6 Department of Biology, Tarleton State University, Stephenville, TX, USA.
  • 7 Working Land and Seascapes, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
  • 8 Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, VA, USA.
  • 9 Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
  • 10 Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA.
  • 11 Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
  • 12 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) are the primary strategy for slowing terrestrial biodiversity loss. Although expansion of PA coverage is prioritized under the Convention on Biological Diversity, it remains unknown whether PAs mitigate declines across the tetrapod tree of life and to what extent land cover and climate change modify PA effectiveness1,2. Here we analysed rates of change in abundance of 2,239 terrestrial vertebrate populations across the globe. On average, vertebrate populations declined five times more slowly within PAs (-0.4% per year) than at similar sites lacking protection (-1.8% per year). The mitigating effects of PAs varied both within and across vertebrate classes, with amphibians and birds experiencing the greatest benefits. The benefits of PAs were lower for amphibians in areas with converted land cover and lower for reptiles in areas with rapid climate warming. By contrast, the mitigating impacts of PAs were consistently augmented by effective national governance. This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of PAs as a strategy for slowing tetrapod declines. However, optimizing the growing PA network requires targeted protection of sensitive clades and mitigation of threats beyond PA boundaries. Provided the conditions of targeted protection, adequate governance and well-managed landscapes are met, PAs can serve a critical role in safeguarding tetrapod biodiversity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Cazalis, V. The multifaceted challenge of evaluating protected area effectiveness. Nat. Commun. 11, 5147 (2020). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Barnes, M. D., Glew, L., Wyborn, C. & Craigie, I. D. Prevent perverse outcomes from global protected area policy. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 759–762 (2018).
    1. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020—Key findings (FAO, 2020); https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8753en .
    1. Burke, K. et al. Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 13288–13293 (2018). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Ceballos, G. et al. Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400253 (2015).

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Cite
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.