This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Save citation to file

Add to Collections

Name must be less than 100 characters
Unable to load your collection due to an error
Please try again

Add to My Bibliography

Unable to load your delegates due to an error
Please try again

Your saved search

Would you like email updates of new search results?
Saved Search Alert Radio Buttons
()

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

. 2021 Jan;30(1):e13133.
doi: 10.1111/ecc.13133. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

Australian inpatient cancer rehabilitation, as seen by patients receiving care, pre- and post-intervention

Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 HammondCare Centre for Positive Ageing, Hammondville, New South Wales, Australia.
  • 2 University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • 3 Jacaranda Rehabilitation Unit, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Australian inpatient cancer rehabilitation, as seen by patients receiving care, pre- and post-intervention

Najwa Reynolds et al. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan.
. 2021 Jan;30(1):e13133.
doi: 10.1111/ecc.13133. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

Affiliations

  • 1 HammondCare Centre for Positive Ageing, Hammondville, New South Wales, Australia.
  • 2 University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • 3 Jacaranda Rehabilitation Unit, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Objective: Rehabilitation is increasingly recognised as effective in addressing impairment and functional disability after cancer treatment. Few studies have investigated the lived positive and negative experiences of cancer patients receiving rehabilitation.

Method: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 22 inpatient volunteers, at their admission and discharge from a subacute hospital rehabilitation unit. We heard narratives of their experiences and their individual goals in our programmes, seeking to make positive and negative subjective interpretations of these. We undertook Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) of interviews.

Results: Patients described an immense array of personal challenges, including coping with and adapting to functional losses, whilst assimilating the reality that life might not continue as before. They were often living and rehabilitating after the residual effects of cancer treatments, whilst facing new challenges that threatened their quality of life. Although rehabilitation usually improved patients' functional abilities, many still increasingly needed to depend on others in daily life.

Conclusion: Understanding the narrative of these experiences provides a unique consumer evaluation of an inpatient cancer rehabilitation service. Individuals described a healing environment, where they received multiple therapies and set goals to improve daily living function, as they continued along their personal cancer trajectories.

Keywords: IPA; cancer rehabilitation; health service evaluation; inpatients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ashworth, P. (2008). Conceptual foundations of qualitative psychology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London, England: Sage Publications.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare [AIHW] (2017). Cancer in Australia 2017. Cancer series number 101. Cat. No. Can 100. Canberra, Australia: AIHW.
    1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Brocki, J., & Weardon, A. (2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology & Health, 21(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320500230185
    1. Cancer Research UK [CRUK] (2014). http://www.cancerresearchuk.org

LinkOut - more resources

Cite
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.