This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Save citation to file

Add to Collections

Name must be less than 100 characters
Unable to load your collection due to an error
Please try again

Add to My Bibliography

Unable to load your delegates due to an error
Please try again

Your saved search

Would you like email updates of new search results?
Saved Search Alert Radio Buttons
()

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

. 2014 May;113(6):931-8.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu015. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

Adaptation for rodent pollination in Leucospermum arenarium (Proteaceae) despite rapid pollen loss during grooming

Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.

Adaptation for rodent pollination in Leucospermum arenarium (Proteaceae) despite rapid pollen loss during grooming

Christopher Michael Johnson et al. Ann Bot. 2014 May.
. 2014 May;113(6):931-8.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu015. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

Affiliation

  • 1 Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.

Abstract

Background and aims: Plants are adapted for rodent pollination in diverse and intricate ways. This study explores an extraordinary example of these adaptations in the pincushion Leucospermum arenarium (Proteaceae) from South Africa.

Methods: Live trapping and differential exclusion experiments were used to test the role of rodents versus birds and insects as pollinators. To explore the adaptive significance of geoflory, inflorescences were raised above ground level and seed production was compared. Captive rodents and flowers with artificial stigmas were used to test the effect of grooming on the rate of pollen loss. Microscopy, nectar composition analysis and manipulative experiments were used to investigate the bizarre nectar production and transport system.

Key results: Differential exclusion of rodents, birds and insects demonstrated the importance of rodents in promoting seed production. Live trapping revealed that hairy-footed gerbils, Gerbillurus paeba, and striped field mice, Rhabdomys pumilio, both carried L. arenarium pollen on their forehead and rostrum, but much larger quantities ended up in faeces as a result of grooming. Terrarium experiments showed that grooming exponentially diminished the pollen loads that they carried. The nectar of L. arenarium was found to be unusually viscous and to be presented in a novel location on the petal tips, where rodents could access it without destroying the flowers. Nectar was produced inside the perianth, but was translocated to the petal tips via capillary ducts. In common with many other rodent-pollinated plants, the flowers are presented at ground level, but when raised to higher positions seed production was not reduced, indicating that selection through female function does not drive the evolution of geoflory.

Conclusions: Despite the apparent cost of pollen lost to grooming, L. arenarium has evolved remarkable adaptations for rodent pollination and provides the first case of this pollination system in the genus.

Keywords: Convergent evolution; Gerbillurus paeba; Leucospermum arenarium; Rhabdomys pumilio; floral nectarines; floral syndrome; geoflory; pincushion; pollen fate; pollinator grooming; rodent pollination; specialized pollination system; viscous nectar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Leucospermum arenarium in the field…

Fig. 1.

Leucospermum arenarium in the field and one of its pollinators, Gerbillurus paeba, feeding…
Fig. 1.
Leucospermum arenarium in the field and one of its pollinators, Gerbillurus paeba, feeding on flowers. (A) Pollen presenter contact on G. paeba. (B) G. paeba foraging on L. arenarium. (C) Flowering L. arenarium with dense, mat-forming inflorescences. (D) Geoflorous inflorescences. (E) Pendulous inflorescences above ground level.
Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Box-plot of seed production in…

Fig. 3.

Box-plot of seed production in differential pollinator exclusion experiments. All four treatments were…

Fig. 3.
Box-plot of seed production in differential pollinator exclusion experiments. All four treatments were applied to ten plants. Different letters indicate significant differences between means (P < 0·05).
Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Box plot of the number…

Fig. 4.

Box plot of the number of L. arenarium inflorescences in different height classes…

Fig. 4.
Box plot of the number of L. arenarium inflorescences in different height classes for five sampled plants.
Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Dissections and scanning electron micrograph…

Fig. 5.

Dissections and scanning electron micrograph depicting the capillary channels for nectar transport. (A)…

Fig. 5.
Dissections and scanning electron micrograph depicting the capillary channels for nectar transport. (A) Capillary channel shown in a longitudinal section of an L. arenarium perianth. (B) Site of nectar accumulation in L. arenarium imaged with a dissecting microscope. (C) Electron microscope scan showing capillary channel formed from fused perianth segments.
Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Amount of pollen transferred to…

Fig. 6.

Amount of pollen transferred to recipient flowers with increasing time spent grooming between…

Fig. 6.
Amount of pollen transferred to recipient flowers with increasing time spent grooming between pollen uptake and deposition. The solid line represents the model prediction.
Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Amount of pollen transferred to…

Fig. 7.

Amount of pollen transferred to recipient flowers with increasing time (seconds) between pollen…

Fig. 7.
Amount of pollen transferred to recipient flowers with increasing time (seconds) between pollen uptake and deposition. The solid line represents the model prediction.
Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The odd nectar secretion of

Fig. 2.

The odd nectar secretion of Leucospermum arenarium. (A) Nectar near the end of…

Fig. 2.
The odd nectar secretion of Leucospermum arenarium. (A) Nectar near the end of the petals. (B) Nectar accumulation on L. arenarium inflorescence. (C) Single L. arenarium flower with nectar present. (D) Leucospermum arenarium inflorescence. Scale bars = 5 mm.

References

    1. Adler LS. The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos. 2000;91:409–420.
    1. Baker HG. Sugar concentrations in nectars from hummingbird flowers. Biotropica. 1975;7:37–41.
    1. Beattie AJ. Floral evolution in Viola. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 1974;61:781–793.
    1. Biccard A, Midgley JJ. Rodent pollination in Protea nana. South African Journal of Botany. 2009;75:720–725.
    1. Carpenter FL. Hooks for mammal pollination. Oecologia. 1978;35:123–132. - PubMed
Cite
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.