Skip to main content
Asked
Viewed 2k times
176

While looking at the new article New Kids on the Block, I've noticed the author avatar was taking some time to load. Looking at the image, it is indeed quite heavy: 2,6MB for a 3339x3339 pixels image displayed at only 48x48 pixels...

Shouldn't you compress/resize these images?

19
  • 1
    Looks like it's probably just that one image, other author images are much smaller.
    patricksweeney
    –  patricksweeney
    2017-06-12 15:39:41 +00:00
    Commented Jun 12, 2017 at 15:39
  • 1
    Probably, I've used the plural in case there were other cases like this one, didn't checked.
    Veve
    –  Veve
    2017-06-12 15:40:31 +00:00
    Commented Jun 12, 2017 at 15:40
  • 40
    Applicable: idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm
    Martin Tournoij
    –  Martin Tournoij
    2017-06-12 16:17:21 +00:00
    Commented Jun 12, 2017 at 16:17
  • 76
    I'm sure Julia is delighted that you can zoom in to even the most minute of details on her face!
    DavidG
    –  DavidG
    2017-06-12 17:38:40 +00:00
    Commented Jun 12, 2017 at 17:38
  • 13
    The "Stack Overflow" link in Julia's page in Stack Overflow Blog is invalid - http://[optional,%20url%20to%20your%20stack%20overflow/exchange%20profile%5D
    Pang
    –  Pang
    2017-06-13 01:57:24 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 1:57
  • 24
    this could kill bandwidth with limited data plan on mobile...
    Fredou
    –  Fredou
    2017-06-13 02:14:00 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 2:14
  • @Pang Ha! That's awesome.
    Draco18s no longer trusts SE
    –  Draco18s no longer trusts SE
    2017-06-13 02:14:55 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 2:14
  • @DavidG I wish you could but the image is not even sharp at 100%. This is probably what happens when scanning a photo the size of the stamp at 2400 dpi :-)
    Capsule
    –  Capsule
    2017-06-13 11:37:09 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 11:37
  • 1
    This has been brought up before. Can't find the post but those avatars have been huge for quite some time.
    Brad
    –  Brad
    2017-06-13 14:30:52 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 14:30
  • Somewhat related; I just noticed that some browser vendors are considering automatically blocking images like this which use an unreasonable amount of bandwidth: github.com/WICG/interventions/issues/40
    Ajedi32
    –  Ajedi32
    2017-06-13 16:13:38 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 16:13
  • 3
    For those wondering: no it's not on the blog repository github.com/StackExchange/stack-blog, through Nick fixed it github.com/StackExchange/stack-blog/commit/…
    Braiam
    –  Braiam
    2017-06-13 17:19:19 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 17:19
  • 6
    Working on it... Gotta track down who has the right permissions on the blog to fix it up.
    Adam Lear
    –  Adam Lear StaffMod
    2017-06-14 16:10:37 +00:00
    Commented Jun 14, 2017 at 16:10
  • 1
    Not as big as Julia's avatar but still oversized, on Download Stack Overflow’s 2017 Developer Survey Data Kevin Troy's avatar is at 800x800px.
    Veve
    –  Veve
    2017-06-15 16:18:11 +00:00
    Commented Jun 15, 2017 at 16:18
  • 2
    @D.G. Thanks for the heads up, I pinged folks internally about that one.
    Adam Lear
    –  Adam Lear StaffMod
    2017-06-20 19:50:49 +00:00
    Commented Jun 20, 2017 at 19:50
  • 1
    800x800 is still excessive, but it's at least an order of magnitude smaller than 3339x3339.
    Draco18s no longer trusts SE
    –  Draco18s no longer trusts SE
    2017-06-20 20:02:25 +00:00
    Commented Jun 20, 2017 at 20:02

1 Answer 1

-14

Nick saves the day, without causing something worse *phew*, and changes the image to something that isn't so BIGLY. Now we need someone to figure out how long is the html cached or if a rebuild is needed.

11
  • 14
    Nick, if you are reading this, we need a rebuild.
    Braiam
    –  Braiam
    2017-06-13 17:25:28 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 17:25
  • 2
    Yes, please, rebuild and publish now!!1!!! This bug report has more them 100 upvotes !!!!11!
    Zanon
    –  Zanon
    2017-06-13 19:56:54 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 19:56
  • 4
    The blog doesn't use Jekyll, or that repository anymore; a rebuild will not help.
    D.G.
    –  D.G.
    2017-06-13 20:40:23 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 20:40
  • 7
    Saves the day? That was done 4 months ago!
    DavidG
    –  DavidG
    2017-06-13 20:49:52 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 20:49
  • @D.G. how do you know?
    Braiam
    –  Braiam
    2017-06-13 21:07:51 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 21:07
  • 3
    @DavidG well, it was a day... 4 months ago... :D
    Braiam
    –  Braiam
    2017-06-13 21:08:05 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 21:08
  • 4
    @Braiam Because I work with the blog (marketing) team on the podcast, and was consulted on (part of) the last migration. Also, the last commit was back in Feb, yet the blog keeps on updating ;)
    D.G.
    –  D.G.
    2017-06-13 21:10:58 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 21:10
  • @D.G. darn it, so... what we are using now?
    Braiam
    –  Braiam
    2017-06-13 21:49:59 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 21:49
  • 7
    Pay no attention to the Wordpress behind the curtain!
    D.G.
    –  D.G.
    2017-06-13 22:05:45 +00:00
    Commented Jun 13, 2017 at 22:05
  • 2
    @D.G. so the Stack Overflow went from Wordpress to Jekyll and now they're back on Wordpress?
    Dimitri Mestdagh
    –  Dimitri Mestdagh
    2017-06-14 09:24:21 +00:00
    Commented Jun 14, 2017 at 9:24
  • 5
    @g00glen00b Basically. The difference is that now it's externally hosted Wordpress instead of something our SRE team has to maintain.
    Adam Lear
    –  Adam Lear StaffMod
    2017-06-14 16:20:42 +00:00
    Commented Jun 14, 2017 at 16:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.