-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
added mocking for fs/promises #14900
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
create-wdio
eslint-plugin-wdio
@wdio/allure-reporter
@wdio/appium-service
@wdio/browser-runner
@wdio/browserstack-service
@wdio/cli
@wdio/concise-reporter
@wdio/config
@wdio/cucumber-framework
@wdio/dot-reporter
@wdio/firefox-profile-service
@wdio/globals
@wdio/jasmine-framework
@wdio/json-reporter
@wdio/junit-reporter
@wdio/lighthouse-service
@wdio/local-runner
@wdio/logger
@wdio/mocha-framework
@wdio/protocols
@wdio/repl
@wdio/reporter
@wdio/runner
@wdio/sauce-service
@wdio/shared-store-service
@wdio/smoke-test-cjs-service
@wdio/smoke-test-reporter
@wdio/smoke-test-service
@wdio/spec-reporter
@wdio/static-server-service
@wdio/sumologic-reporter
@wdio/testingbot-service
@wdio/types
@wdio/utils
@wdio/webdriver-mock-service
@wdio/xvfb
webdriver
webdriverio
commit: |
|
@christian-bromann |
christian-bromann
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
|
Hey mccmrunal 👋 Thank you for your contribution to WebdriverIO! Your pull request has been marked as an "Expensable" contribution. We've sent you an email with further instructions on how to claim your expenses from our development fund. We are looking forward to more contributions from you in the future 🙌 Have a nice day, |
Proposed changes
fixes #14899 14899
//: # (Describe the big picture of your changes here to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request. If it fixes a bug or resolves a feature request, be sure to link to that issue.)
The issue was introduced by PR #14793
This PR replaced a custom utility function getAbsoluteFilepath with the native path.resolve.
Before the change:
saveRecordingScreen.ts
used getAbsoluteFilepath(filepath)
After the change:
saveRecordingScreen.ts
directly calls path.resolve(filepath).
In Call #1, we explicitly call path.resolve(filepath).
In Call #2, when we call assertDirectoryExists, it uses fs.access internally. In Node.js 20, fs.access itself calls path.resolve (which we weren’t mocking earlier).
So we went from having 0 calls (or just 1 internal call) to having 2 calls — one explicit and one internal — but our test was still expecting exactly 1 call.
Types of changes
Checklist
Backport Request
//: # (The current
mainbranch is the development branch for WebdriverIO v9. If your change should be released to the current major version of WebdriverIO (v8), please raise another PR with the same changes against thev8branch.)v9and doesn't need to be back-ported#XXXXXFurther comments
Reviewers: @webdriverio/project-committers