Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Appearance settings

Fix typos and add clarity #1959

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2022
Merged

Fix typos and add clarity #1959

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions 4 docs/api/wrapper/findComponent.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ expect(barRef.exists()).toBe(true)
```

::: warning Usage with CSS selectors
Using `findAllComponents` with CSS selector might have confusing behavior
Using `findComponent` with a CSS selector might have confusing behavior

Consider this example:

Expand All @@ -50,5 +50,5 @@ const childByCss = wrapper.findComponent('.child')
expect(childByCss.vm.$options.name).toBe('Root') // => still Root
```

The reason for such behavior is that `RootComponent` and `ChildComponent` are sharing same DOM node and only first matching component is included for each unique DOM node
The reason for such behavior is that `RootComponent` and `ChildComponent` are sharing the same DOM node and only the first matching component is returned for each unique DOM node
:::
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.