PR Summary

This pull request introduces several enhancements to the ValidMind documentation and user interface. Key changes include:

1. Navigation and UI Updates:

   • Updated the icon for the "Guides" section in the navigation menu from a circle-info icon to a book icon for better representation.
   • Adjusted the layout and presentation of buttons and links across various documentation pages to improve user experience, including the addition of green button styling for better visibility.

2. Content and Structural Improvements:

   • Revised the text and structure in multiple documentation files to enhance clarity and readability. This includes changes to the description of the ValidMind components and the supported models and libraries.
   • Added new content sections and reorganized existing ones to provide a more logical flow of information, particularly in the "Supported Models" and "Get Started" sections.
   • Introduced a new listing section in the "Supported Models" documentation to highlight the extensibility of the ValidMind developer tool for future model types.

3. Code Samples and Interactive Elements:

   • Enhanced the presentation of code samples and interactive elements, such as Jupyter Notebooks, by updating links and button styles to encourage user engagement.
   • Improved the callout sections to better guide users through the documentation and testing processes.

4. Miscellaneous:

   • Minor text edits and formatting changes to ensure consistency across the documentation.
   • Commented out unused sections to clean up the documentation files.

These changes aim to improve the overall user experience and accessibility of the ValidMind documentation, making it easier for developers to navigate and utilize the resources provided.

Test Suggestions

• Verify that all updated icons and buttons render correctly across different browsers and devices.
• Check that all links in the documentation, especially those in the new sections, direct to the correct pages.
• Test the interactive elements, such as Jupyter Notebooks, to ensure they function as expected when accessed via the provided links.
• Review the documentation for any broken links or missing images after the restructuring.
• Ensure that the new content and structural changes do not introduce any inconsistencies or errors in the documentation.

You'd have to go to a more rectilinear .feature layout

Would you believe that that was my first version of this and I reverted it because I thought "Nik will make me remove it"? 🫠 Can you explain why the two-column layouts seem OK to you in other places (that you implemented originally) like in our key concepts or even the supported modeling libraries and not here? To me, the two-column means less white-space on the right which looks a lot more uniform.

EDIT: Changing it from the definition headers to a bigger header is a bit clearer to me, does this adjustment work for you?

I could see the left sidebar matching the headings of these sections better — e.g. "Run tests & test suites" → "Learn how to run tests" — and skip the buttons.

These replaced the tiny "Learn more" links that got lost — I didn't ADD these links, I just changed them into more visible buttons. e.g.:

I also didn't rename these headers, they are the old ones so I am not sure what changes you want based on the arrows you have; can you make them in a commit so I can understand better?

EDIT: Also a reminder that this page is going to get entirely revamped in our upcoming reshuffle — so can we just deal with it then instead of quibbling about the minor details now?

A PR preview is available: Preview URL