Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Conversation

w3nl
Copy link
Collaborator

@w3nl w3nl commented Mar 3, 2025

No description provided.

@w3nl w3nl requested a review from Copilot March 3, 2025 21:23
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@w3nl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f19baca and f13ba0f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (32)
  • .github/workflows/cpd.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/dependabot.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/npm-publish.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/sonarcloud.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/vulnerabilities.yml (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (0 hunks)
  • .vscode/launch.json (1 hunks)
  • eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
  • package.json (3 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/create-all.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/every-object.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/filter-objects.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/int.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/map-objects.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/new-objects.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/parse-all.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/parse-object.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/parser.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/some-object.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/validate-objects.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/validate-sub-objects.test.js (1 hunks)
  • src/int.js (1 hunks)
  • src/objects.js (3 hunks)
  • src/parser.js (1 hunks)
  • src/schemas/parse-options.js (1 hunks)
  • src/schemas/test1.js (1 hunks)
  • src/schemas/test2.js (1 hunks)
  • src/schemas/test3.js (1 hunks)
  • src/schemas/test5.js (1 hunks)
  • src/schemas/test6.js (1 hunks)
  • src/schemas/test7.js (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@w3nl w3nl force-pushed the feature/trojs-linter branch from c6b8e2f to 2e582f4 Compare March 3, 2025 21:24
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Overview

This PR updates the Node.js version from 20 to 22 in various GitHub workflow files to align with the TroJS lint rules and also removes extraneous blank lines in the test files.

  • Update Node.js versions in lint, publish, sonarcloud, vulnerabilities, and cpd workflows
  • Remove stray empty lines from test files

Reviewed Changes

File Description
src/tests/parser.test.js Removed an extra blank/dash line
.github/workflows/lint.yml Updated Node.js version from 20 to 22
.github/workflows/npm-publish.yml Updated Node.js version from 20 to 22
.github/workflows/sonarcloud.yml Updated Node.js version from 20 to 22
.github/workflows/vulnerabilities.yml Updated Node.js version from 20 to 22
.github/workflows/cpd.yml Updated Node.js version from 20 to 22
src/tests/int.test.js Removed an extra blank/dash line

Copilot reviewed 34 out of 34 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (5)

.github/workflows/lint.yml:15

  • Verify that the Node.js 22 update in this workflow is fully compatible with all required tools and dependencies.
node-version: 22

.github/workflows/npm-publish.yml:17

  • Ensure that updating Node.js to 22 does not introduce compatibility issues with the npm publishing process or related actions.
node-version: 22

.github/workflows/sonarcloud.yml:14

  • Confirm that the new Node.js version 22 works seamlessly with the SonarCloud analysis workflow.
node-version: 22

.github/workflows/vulnerabilities.yml:15

  • Review the compatibility of Node.js 22 with the vulnerability checking process in this workflow.
node-version: 22

.github/workflows/cpd.yml:15

  • Ensure that the change to Node.js 22 does not affect the functionality of the CPD workflow.
node-version: 22

@w3nl w3nl merged commit 783c284 into master Mar 3, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.