diff --git a/lib/rules/no-node-access.ts b/lib/rules/no-node-access.ts
index d57e63ca..bfbbc346 100644
--- a/lib/rules/no-node-access.ts
+++ b/lib/rules/no-node-access.ts
@@ -73,7 +73,12 @@ export default createTestingLibraryRule<Options, MessageIds>({
 				ALL_PROHIBITED_MEMBERS.some(
 					(allReturningNode) => allReturningNode === propertyName
 				) &&
-				!EVENTS_SIMULATORS.some((simulator) => simulator === objectName)
+				![
+					...EVENTS_SIMULATORS,
+					// TODO: As discussed in https://github.com/testing-library/eslint-plugin-testing-library/issues/1024, this is just a temporary workaround.
+					// We should address the root cause and implement a proper solution instead of explicitly excluding 'user' here.
+					'user',
+				].some((simulator) => simulator === objectName)
 			) {
 				if (allowContainerFirstChild && propertyName === 'firstChild') {
 					return;
diff --git a/tests/lib/rules/no-node-access.test.ts b/tests/lib/rules/no-node-access.test.ts
index fab437d4..32960944 100644
--- a/tests/lib/rules/no-node-access.test.ts
+++ b/tests/lib/rules/no-node-access.test.ts
@@ -163,6 +163,16 @@ ruleTester.run(RULE_NAME, rule, {
 				expect(screen.getByText('SomeComponent')).toBeInTheDocument();
 				`,
 			},
+			{
+				code: `
+				import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';
+        import { screen } from '${testingFramework}';
+
+        const buttonText = screen.getByText('submit');
+				const user = userEvent.setup();
+				user.click(buttonText);
+      `,
+			},
 			...EVENTS_SIMULATORS.map((simulator) => ({
 				code: `
         import { screen } from '${testingFramework}';