Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings
Discussion options

In static evaluations, we have built-in evaluators for exact match and LLM judge.

Does it make sense to add semantic similarity (instead of using an LLM judge)?

The evaluator would specify an embedding model and a cutoff, then ensure similarity is within that cutoff.

How do we handle things like the hubness problem, different manifold topology for different embedding models, etc.?

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 0 comments

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
1 participant
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.